Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Dr.P.Mangalagowri,Msc(N).,PhD.,
Principal,
College of Nursing,
Madras Medical College.
• If you want one year of prosperity,
grow grain
• If you want ten years of prosperity,
grow trees
• If you want one hundred years of
prosperity, grow people
-Chinese proverb
Introduction
• Traditional methods of
appraisal revels monopoly
findings
• Multiple input approach provide
more accurate reliable and
credible information.
• Various source of assessment
depicts wholesome development
• Nursing is a profession
practiced through the efforts
of team work.
360 degree performance appraisal
• 360 - Degree Appraisal
is a system or process
in which employees
receive confidential,
anonymous feedback
from the people who
work around them.
Definition
• According to ‘
Newstrom’
“Performance
appraisal is the
process of evaluating
the performance of
employees, sharing
that information with
them and searching
for ways to improve
their performance.
Various Methods Used
• Straight Ranking Method
– Self
– Supervisor
– Peers
– Subordinates
– Customers
360 Degree Performance Appraisal
Process
Administer the
Develop
Ensure
feedback, analyze
questionnaire
confidentiality
the data,
D
ev
el
o
p
a
n
d
di
st
ri
b
ut
e
re
su
lts
Advantages:
To the individual:
• Helps individuals to
understand how
others perceive them.
5. Confidentiality for
appraisees and raters –
non-attributable.
Five Integral Components
• Self Appraisal
• Superior’s Appraisal-
Nursing Supervisors,
Director
• Peer Appraisal- Staff
Nurses
• Subordinate’s Appraisal
• Customer- Patients And
Care Givers
Self appraisal
Contributions: Limitations
• improve communication • show low correlation
between supervisor and between self rating and
sub ordinates all other source of rating
• emphasize framing needs • Sometimes it can be
and potential for the lower than others
employee • Self rating should focus
• It is particularly valuable on the appraisal of
in situations where the purpose elements not on
supervisor can’t readily the survey level
observe the work behavior
determinant
and task outcome
Superior’s appraisal
Contributions: Limitations
• First line supervisor is • Sometimes supervisors
often in the best are less reliable for
position to effectively evaluation
carryout the appraisal • Supervisor should be
• They have the authority trainee
to redesign and reassign • Sometimes it is difficult
on employees work to appraise performance
due to the supervision
of large no. of
employees
Peers appraisal
Contributions: Limitations
• Employee report • It is limited only for the
resentment. developmental purposes.
• Contribution of peer • It is difficult to maintain
evaluation in the central confidentiality.
input to the formal • They are familiar only
appraisal. with their team members’
• The peer feed back can task and responsibility.
help the supervisor in to • It is very time consuming.
coaching role rather • It causes tension and
than the judging role. break down
Subordinates appraisal
Limitations
Contributions:
• It helps to know about • Supervisor my fell threatened
employee issues. • It is limited only for the
• It helps to the supervision developmental purpose.
interpersonal skills. • Subordinates with the regular
• Average of combining assignment under manager
subordinates and peer rating
only should be included
provide a component appraisal.
Customer appraisal
Contributions: Limitations
• Customer’s feedback • elicits to evaluate of
serves as an “Anchor team output.
“for almost all other • They do not see or
performance factors. particularly come about
• expansion of the focus the work processes.
of performance feed • expensive and time
consuming process.
Conclusion
• Links the individual to the team
• 360 - Based on observations of
work colleagues of the real you!
• Part of a cycle of change &
development
• Jobs constantly change, roles
need to develop so does the
individual
• Team ethos paramount
• Need all the components to be
effective in achieving the wider
vision
Queries