Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A,B and C
Submitted by : Group-4
Adhip Pandita – 190103009
Aditya Sinha – 190103015
Devyani Deora - 190103053
Kartik Laad - 190103067
Prachi Garg - 190101139
Harshita Jain – 190103060
Keshav Garg – 190103071
Mukund Agarwal - 190103082
Air Compressor Market
Compression
Horsepower
Technology
Sale of complete compressor in US market declined from $500 million in 1980 to $460 million
in 1985
Units sold had increased from 6,00,000 to 9,00,000 during the same period
I-R was the leading supplier in US in each category except for the DIY market
I-R share was approximately 30% of the total $660 million market in 1985
About Ingersoll Rand
COMPETITOR CONTEXT
COMPANY CUSTOMER COLLABORATOR
• Economic:
• Market Share – • Area – North • Upstream- Air • Direct Competitors- • 1982-1983 : Recession
30% America compressor parts • Joy, Sullair, Atlas- occured
• Market Size – • Customer suppliers Copco
$660 million Segments – • Downstream- • Indirect • Social:
• Business Unit – • Retail chains • Retailers Competitors- pirate • Growing number of
parts vendors competitors leading to
Stationary air such as Grainger, • Independent price wars and
compressor Lowe’s and distributors Competition from “pirate
Division Grossman’s • Manufacturers’ parts” suppliers
• Current Products • Ski industry and Representatives
- Stationary air Government • Technological:
compressors agencies • Major change with “oil
• Types of • Do-It-Yourself free” or “Dry” air
compressors
compressors - customers
Reciprocating, • OEMs • Opportunities –
Rotatory and • Customer’s willingness
Centrifugal increased to try new
• Sizes – ¾ hp – products
6000 hp
• Distribution • Threats –
Channels – Direct, • Price wars eating up the
Independent industry profits
• Competition from pirate
distributors, Air parts suppliers
Centers, MRs
Distributor Network
Ingersoll Rand
Air centres
Products Sell –
• Rotary compressors below 450 hp
• Reciprocating compressors below 250 hp
19 air centers
Only IR company products
Invoiced at 20% off list price
Earn 10-15% gross margin on compressors and 30-35% on spare parts
Manufactures Representative
Product sells –
• Large compressors – because of need of coordinate sales efforts and heavy engineering
component of the sale
• Do it yourself products
5 manufacturing representative
Paid 3% commission sales
Rationale Behind Multiple Channels
Differences in buying
behavior and attempts to
service different needs
through different channel
systems
Buying Behaviour
Large Machines (Above 300 hp)
Generally used in custom designed specifications
Requires high degree of technical expertise and coordinated sales effort
Downtime can lead to huge losses thus service requirements are even more complex
Direct sales force with a dedicated account manager is ideal
• Interchannel Competition: Company’s channels sometimes competed directly with each other for sale
• To reduce this competition, introduced Full-Partner Programme
• Commissions available to distributors, direct sales reps and air centers for referring inquiries to each other
and active assistance in getting the order
• Independent distributors and Air centers perceived the other as receiving favored treatment
• Distributers contended air centers got better prices, information and service since owned by the company
• Air centers contended that the sales territories were exclusive and air centers had territories with poor
potential
Decision on Centac-200
Problem: To sell the 200 HP centrifugal machine via distributors/air centers or direct sales team
Considerations:
Low spare part requirements for Centac-200 likely to make it less attractive for distributors
Good technical support required with Centac-200 which Clabough believed the service department could
provide but not distributors
Centac-200 is an oil free machine, competing directly with Atlas-Copco’s successful Z series rotary compressor
sold through distributors
Effect of decision on the relationship between direct sales force, distributors, and air centers
Decision on Centac-200
Options Pros Cons
Although Full Partner program was claimed to grew at $200,000, but half of it was achieved by joint
efforts of Sales representative and the area distributor
The distributors did not added any new business, and 30% of the IR business was transferred to
distributors account
Sales representatives stated a problem that distributors had an advantage of providing additional 5%
discount to the customer, whereas they needed to get permission from their bosses
Turnover in direct sales force was 5-6 representative per year excluding those who retired or got promoted to
management roles
Average field sales experience of sales force reduced to 4.5 years with median time in territory of 2 years
Reasons
Meetings were schedules to evaluate alternate channels against the existing ones
Possible sales channel structure was evaluated on the basis of staffing plan and cost of changing from old structure
Resolving the issue (2/2)
US market broken into 35 Sales territories with an account manager in charge responsible for direct as well as
distributor sales
Air centers reported directly to own independent Air Center managers at headquarters
Revamping of sales compensation structure (1.5% direct sales, ¾% of sales to distributors, and a part bonus)
All incentives and commissions including the Full Time Program were withdrawn
The direct-distributor classification boundary was set up at 300hp for both reciprocating and rotary compressors
All existing sales personal and distributor sales managers were absorbed as account managers
THANK YOU!