School of Mechanical and Civil Engineering

Presentation for Minor Project (Review 1)

USE OF NO FINE CONCRETE

Group member name :

1) SAURABH SURALE
2) JAYESH ANDHALE
3) MONIKA SAKHARE
4) AVINASH JADHAV

Guide :
Mr. Sumit Patil
 INDEX

 Introduction
 Literature survey
 Objectives
 Problem
 Methodology
 Future work
 Pictures at the time of casting
 References
 INTRODUCTION

 No-fines concrete is obtained by eliminating the fine material sand, from the normal
concrete mix.

 The single-sized coarse aggregates are surrounded and held together by a thin layer of
cement paste giving strength of concrete.

 No-Fines Concrete is a lightweight concrete, porus, permeable, etc.

No fine of concrete
 LITERATURE SURVEY
1) M. Carsana at all “USE OF NO-FINES CONCRETE AS A BUILDING MATERIAL:
STRENGTH, DURABILITY PROPERTIES AND CORROSION PROTECTION OF
EMBEDDED STEEL”, Elsevier, 15 FEB 2013.

 In this research paper they studied that No-fines concrete with water/cement ratio
ranging from 0.34 to 0.41.

 aggregate/cement ratio of 4–8 were subjected to fast carbonation showing that

these materials rapidly fail to provide alkaline conditions able to promote
passivity of embedded carbon steel.

 The time of initiation of corrosion may be only few weeks when the material is
exposed to the atmosphere.
2) F. Tittarelli at all “EFFECT OF HYDROPHOBIC ADMIXTURE AND RECYCLED
AGGREGATE ON PHYSICAL–MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND DURABILITY
ASPECTS OF NO-FINES CONCRETE” Elsevier,15 May 2014.

Intheir project they studied that No-fines concretes with three different mix
design were manufactured. The water/cement ratio from 0.41 to 0.34 and the
aggregate/cement ratio from 8 to 4.

an alkyl-triethoxy-silane was used as hydrophobic silane.

Theeffect of hydrophobic admixture, at two different dosages, and recycled

aggregate on the performances of no-fines concrete was investigated.

Phenolphthalein test on no-fines concretes without and with hydrophobic

admixture after 30 days of exposure to carbonation chamber is adopted
 3) Francisco Sierraa at all “COMPARISON OF PREDICTION TOOLS TO DETERMINE
THEIR RELIABILITY ON CALCULATING OPERATIONAL HEATING CONSUMPTION
BY MONITORING NO-FINES CONCRETE DWELLINGS”, Energy & Buildings, 5 July 2018

 The aim of this study was to determine the level of reliability of three tools (RdSAP, SAP and IES)
often used to predict heating savings when adding EWI. Even though RdSAP and SAP are simply
regulatory tools with known limitations, they are commonly used de-facto to benchmark the impact
of thermal upgrades.

 On the other hand, IES is a more sophisticated dynamic simulation software, capable of inputting
actual data for most of the factors linked to heating consumption.

 The comparison between predictions and actual values demonstrated that steady state tools (RdSAP
and SAP) are not able to predict the operational energy consumption of a house accurately.
 4) Manendra Vaitla at all “STUDY ON BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE WITH PARTIAL
REPLACEMENT OF FINE AGGREGATE WITH WASTE PLASTICS”, Elsevier,2019.

 In this paper they have discussed about the behavior of concrete with partial replacement of
fine aggregate with plastic wastes ranging from 15-30% with small grain size are incorporated.

 Performance of M20 grade of concrete is being studied. The blocks casted using this concrete
can be used for dividers and temporary structures.

 They can also be used for bedding of banks since there is no vertical load acting on them.
Slump test, water absorption test, water permeability test and compressive strength test were
conducted on the concrete.

 The compressive strength of waste plastic concrete blocks has increased compared to
conventional concrete blocks.
5) K. Naveen Kumar at all “AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON
LIGHT-WEIGHT CONCRETE BLOCKS USING VERMICULITE”,
Elsevier,19 November 2019.

 Lightweight Vermiculite concrete blocks casted and tested leads to Experimental test
results on compressive strength at 7, 14, 28 days gives reliable results as per IS 2185 – 1
(2005).

 The block density test conducted under laboratory condition found out to be average dry
block density.

 The above two results such as compressive strength and block density tests compared
with c indicates that the vermiculite

 lightweight blocks trial mix 1:1.5:15 casted and tested laboratory condition can be
classified as TYPE: Solid load bearing unit and its GRADE: C.
6) Einstine M. at all “Effects of coal fly ash and fine sawdust on the
performance of pervious concrete” Elsevier,2019.

 Pervious Concrete (PC) has long been used in surface runoff management. But
one of its major drawbacks is its low strength.

 Several industrial wastes apparently contain properties that could aid the
increase in strength of PC such as coal fly ash and fine sawdust.

 Based on their results, they selected design mix ratio of 1:3.5, at a w/c ratio of
0.35 for the PC with CFA and FSD passed the compressive, flexural and
permeability requirements.

 it was within the typical range of values for both strength and permeability
properties of a well functioning PC pavement as per NRMCA.
 OBJECTIVE
 To reuse the plastic waste

 To maintain the quality of no fine concrete after introduction of pet plastic.

 Increase strength of concrete.

 To make sure it is economical

 PROBLEM

 what is the solution for blockage of drainage lines, reducing run off in mass
concreting ??
 METHODOLOGY

 Collection of research papers and literature review

 Decide mix design and parameters of project. Ex- W/C, A/C etc

 Material availability and testing.

 Casting of Cubes and testing.

 Final results analysis of compression test.

 For best compression results .

W/C and A/C
SEVEN DAYS STRENGTH SHOWING
 FUTURE WORK
 In that carried out taking one aggregate cement ratio and four water cement ratio

 and then prepare each water cement ratio nine block this block having without plastic only in
that cement , water, course aggregate

 and then checking three block each 7days, 14days, 28days testing and then observe that which
water cement ratio give more strength

 and then this water cement ratio using 8 % plastic is add in that and then check its compressive
strength is increase or decrease.
 REFERENCE

 No fine of concrete
 Constructor civil engineering home
 Civilblog.org
 Mpa concrete centre
 www.quara.com
 Wikipedia
PICTURES AT TIME OF CASTING
Thank you