Pre Empowered Committee

Meeting of Andhra Pradesh

Batch II of 2019-20

PMGSY-III

05th March, 2020

 Details of Current Proposals (PMGSY-III)
As per State’s proposal dated 04.03.2020 As per OMMAS as on 04.03.2020

Cost Avg. Cost Avg.

Length Length
Item Nos (Rs in Cost/km Nos (Rs in Cost/km
(in km) (in km)
Crores) (Lakhs) Crores) (Lakhs)

Up-Gradation
248 1,958.91 1,339.15 68.36 248 1,955.69 1,340.01 68.52
- Roads
LSBs 3 233.14 9.18 3.94 3 233.14 9.18 3.94

1,958.91 1,955.69 Km
248 248
Km roads 1,348.33 roads
Total roads roads 1,349.19*
233.14 m * 233.14 m
3 LSBs 3 LSBs
LSBs LSBs

*MoRD Share : Rs. 809.29 Crores State Share : Rs. 539.90 Crores
Target : 3,285 Km Sanctioned : 935.84 km

5.5 m width road- 3 Nos & Length – 25.30 km - Rs. 132.34 Lakhs/Km
3.75 m width road – 245 Nos & Length- 1,930.39 Km – Rs. 67.68 Lakhs/Km
RQI proposed for 13.28 kms
BT-838.35 kms, WBM-39.16 kms, Gravel – 531.72 kms, Track – 521.20
kms
 Average Cost lakhs /Km

140 132.34

120

100

80 69.01 67.68
52.28 55.26
60 48.53

40

20

0
2017-18 (PMGSY) 2018-19 (PMGSY) 2019-20 (PMGSY- 2019-20 (PMGSY- Pre EC (3.75) Pre EC (5.50)
III-3.75) III-5.50)
 Length wise proposal details
Length Cost in Average
Sl No Items No of roads
in km Crores cost/Km
1 2 to 3 km 3 7.53 4.89 64.94

2 3 to 5 Km 27 115.13 110.91 96.33

3 More than 5 218 1833.04 1224.21 66.79

  Total 248 1955.70 1340.01 68.52

*Roads having length less than 3 Km need to be deleted.

 Distribution of roads based on Traffic Category

3.75 m carriageway width 5.50 m carriageway width

Sl Traffic
No of
No details Length Cost Rs. Average No of Length Cost Rs. Average
road
in Km In Lakhs cost/Km roads in Km In Lakhs cost/Km
s

1 Less than T7 234 1845.89 1236.13 66.97 1 3.00 4.13 137.67

2 T9 11 84.51 70.39 83.29 2 22.30 29.35 131.61

  Total 245 1930.40 1306.52 67.68 3 25.30 33.48 132.33

 Average cost Trends of sanctioned PMGSY-III work/Considered by
the Pre EC
Sl Cost Rs. In Average
State Length in Km
No Crore cost/Km
1 Chhattisgarh 3,729.17 2,260.70 60.62*
2 Madhya Pradesh 1,444.32 1,142.85 79.13**
Andhra Pradesh
3 935.38 526.12 56.25
(Batch I)
4 Rajasthan 2,198.39 1,139.06 51.81
5 Tamil Nadu 1,043.86 553.10 52.99
6 Karnataka 3,226.21 2,124.43 65.85
7 Gujarat (Pre EC) 784.77 530.55 67.61
Andhra Pradesh 1,955.69 1,340.01 68.52$
8 Haryana 451.26 256.97 56.94***
  Total 15,769.05 9,873.79 62.61

*190 roads of 2,200.65 kms (59%) proposed with 5.50 m carriageway width
**78 roads of 1,161.76 kms (80.44%) proposed with 5.50 m carriageway
width
*** All roads proposed with 5.50 m carriageway width
$3 roads of 25.30 Km proposed with 5.50 carriageway width
 Average cost Trends
Current proposal
PMGSY-III
5.50 m carriageway PMGSY-I PMGSY-II RCPLWE
3.75 m carriageway width (Batch I)
Sl width
District
No Avera Avera
Leng
Length Total ge Total ge 3.75 5.50 2017 2018 2013- 2018- 2017 2018 2019
Nos Nos th in
in Kms Cost cost/ Cost cost/K m m -18 -19 14 19 -18 -19 -20
Kms
Km m
Anantapu 69.1
1 10 134.54 58.57 43.53         46.80 52.09   44.61        
r 0
2 Chittoor 30 213.37 114.76 53.78         56.89       45.99        
East
3 10 61.13 34.93 57.14         51.08   39.47 44.86 50.22   67.18   29.81
Godavari
88.9 10.0 156.0
4 Guntur 28 180.96 160.93 1 15.60         54.07        
3 0 0
83.3 15.3 116.8 114.9
5 Krishna 24 176.29 147.01 2 17.88 72.01       58.34      
9 0 6 1
6 Kurnool 17 170.47 85.95 50.42         65.35       47.90        
7 Nellore 20 163.76 115.11 70.29             70.64   53.75        

8 Prakasam 19 171.6 113.01 65.86                 49.84        

Srikakula 70.0
9 10 72.77 50.97         62.00       49.51   51.12 69.55 60.83
m 4
Visakhap
10 2 15.49 8.83 57.00         50.78   53.65 45.89 61.55   70.80 72.75 65.01
atnam
Vizianaga
11 5 43.37 29.45 67.90         53.04   54.83 62.35 55.89   81.48 80.36 78.02
ram
West 111. 102.2
12 27 168.61 188.02               54.53        
Godavari 51 0
YSR
13 43 357.98 198.99 55.59                 41.55 62.67      
Kadapa
1930. 1306. 67.6 25.3 132.3 55.2 69.1 52.8 47.9 50.7 93.9 69.5 73.5 62.1
Total 245 3 33.48
  34 53 8 0 3 6 0 2 4 7 9 6 2 1
 Existing surface wise cost comparison (3.75 m carriageway width roads)
Existing BT surface Existing WBM Existing Gravel Track
Sr. Distric Len Pav Len Pav Len Pav Pav
No t Co Cos Tota Tota Leng Cos Tot Cos
gth eme Total Cost gth eme Cost gth eme Cost Cost eme
. Name Nos st/ Nos t/K l Nos l Nos th in t/K al t/K
in nt cost /KM in nt /KM in nt /Km /KM nt
Km m cost cost Km m cost M
Km cost Km cost Km cost cost
Anantap 112.7 31.7 10.0 46.3
1 8 35.85 48.48 42.99 2 21.77 7.85 36.06
ur 7 9                         9 5
25.4 140.5 82.5 58.7
2 Chittoor 3 22.66 5.77 7.44 32.83 7 50.17 17.80 35.48 24.79 49.41 20 60.41 42.98
6             4 3 2

East 46.2
3 10 61.13 28.30 34.93 57.14        
Godavari 9
                           
120.9 54.5 118.4 44.1 99.6
4 Guntur 18 66.02 99.54 82.28 1 6.85 3.91 57.08 6.80 99.27 2 8.8 7.75 88.07 10.42 7 44.34 33.55 75.67
7 8 1 8 4

43.7 88.0 99.9

5 Krishna 3 24.93 10.90 12.79 51.30 8 63.29 34.24 54.1 46.17 72.95 13 88.07 68.93 78.27
2             4 7

34.9 12.2 49.7 59.4

6 Kurnool 6 64.98 22.72 30.29 46.61 1 2.34 19.07 3.25 26.49 1 9.54 2.03 21.28 2.65 27.78 9 83.68 36.92 44.12
6 7 6 6

115.3 39.6 17.2 69.6

7 Nellore 13 45.80 75.18 65.16 4 23.64 13.08 55.33 22.69 95.98 3 24.75 11.27 45.54
8 9             4 6
Prakasa 34.6 38.2 77.7
8 3 24.13 8.37 11.81 48.94 11 98.35 42.61 43.32 63.00 64.06 5 49.12 23.97 48.80
m 9             0 7

Srikakul 37.5
9 10 72.77 27.35 50.97 70.04        
am 8                            

Visakhap 15.4
10             2 5.31 34.28 8.83 57.00        
atnam 9
               

Vizianag 37.9
11 2 21.69 8.22 13.95 64.32 1 4.55 2.18 47.91 3.10 68.13 2 17.13 5.69 33.22 12.40 72.39    
aram 0
       

West 110.4 67. 109.7 50.8 137.

12 18 75.08 121.20 3 21.16 12.90 60.96 16.03 75.76 6 36.97 34.11 92.26
Godavari 8 96 0 0 4
           

YSR 37.9 239.6 104.3 135.3 18.9 59.2

13 11 86.46 32.83 44.70 51.70 27 43.55 56.48 5 31.96 14.14 44.24
Kadapa 7 4 6 6 2 0
           
838.3 367.2 43.8 39.1 531.7 240.4 333.5 521.2 291.1 399. 76.7
  Total 105 551.28 65.76 5 13.74 35.09 21.98 56.13 65 45.22 62.72 70 55.86
5 1 0 6 2 6 1 0 5 76 0
 DPR issues – PMGSY-III
 State should reconcile the sanction details on OMMAS as per
clearance letters for the year 2000-01, 2001-02, 2003-04 & 2005-
06.
 State needs to provide Copy of SLSC approval, MP-I, MP-II & MP-III and
Mandatory certificates duly signed by the competent authority.
 Average cost per Km is on the higher side particularly in Guntur, Krishna,
Srikalkulam and West Godavari districts.
 47 roads are having average cost more than 90 Lakhs/Km for 3.75 m
carriageway width. Site verification report of CE/SE needs to be provided
with detailed justifications.
 Many of the roads proposed from Earthen surface which indicates the
selection of candidate roads is questionable. Some petitions also received
from the public for improper selection of roads and proposed under PMGSY-
III.
 3rd party traffic verification as per IRC guidelines needs to be provided by
the State.
 State needs to ensure that the required land width is available to provide 9
m top width as per IRC guidelines.
 Provision made in the DPRs with carted earth for construction of sub grade.
However, the pavement has not been designed based on proposed sub-
grade CBR (AP09PIII04).
 L and X section drawings attached with the DPRs are not legible.
 Drainage layer has been proposed for the entire width of road. It should be
9
restricted to carriageway width (AP06PIIICHE01).
 DPR issues – PMGSY-III
 State has proposed certain roads with Geo-Synthetic Geo Coir at the
rate of about Rs. 230/Sqm. The sub-grade constructed with carted soil
at the rate of Rs.1,000 to 1,210/Cum. Pavement designed based on
original CBR of less than 3. The pavement should be designed based on
new sub grade CBR (AP22PIII22 & AP06PIIICHE01). Due to Geo textile
the cost of Rs. 13.50 to 20 lakhs/kms increased.
 Hard shoulder should be proposed only 1m width on either side and
maximum 100 mm thickness as per IRC SP:72:2015.
 Overlay thickness over existing BT layer should be proposed as per
Clause 2.2.3 of IRC:SP:72:2015. The State has removed entire crust
and constructed right from sub grade construction (AP09PIII04).
 Protection works proposed without proper justifications (AP22PIII16,
AP22PIII22). Needs to be justified with L and X section drawings.
 RCC retaining wall has been proposed invariably for 1.50 m to 2.00 m
height above ground level.
 Lump sum provisions such as Price variation, Quality Control charges
are not permitted as per PMGSY guidelines.
 The length of head wall proposed in single row pipe culverts is 8 m.
which should be maximum 6.15 m (AP22PIII22).
 Proposed more length of Return wall and wing wall which increase the
cost of CD works.
10
 DPR issues – PMGSY-III
 As the State has proposed BM of 50 mm thickness, the tack coat
proposed on primed granular surface should be deleted as per DO letter
no. NRRDA-PO14 (11)/1/2018-JD (Tech) dated 23.03.2018.
 Sand soling proposed in CD works needs to be deleted as the soil is good.
 Wearing coat proposed for less than 5 m span culvert needs to be deleted
and BT can be proposed over deck slab as per IRC SP:2002.
 Pavement quantities of existing & Proposed bridges, RCC culverts portions
have not been deducted from the total pavement quantity. Needs to be
deducted (AP09PIII04, AP06PIIICHE01).
 Agency area allowance for labours at the rate of 25% included in the rate
analysis needs be deleted as per NRIDA letter no. P-17023/5/2017-P-I
dated 25.01.2019 or should come from the State share.
 Road safety audit report not attached with the DPRs. However, about 3 to
4 lakhs/Km has been proposed for road safety items.
 Provision for Unforeseen items and price escalation is not permitted under
PMGSY. Needs to be deleted or it should come from State share.
 The seigniorage added with the basic rate for individual materials and the
same rate must have been considered in the rate analysis. But as per the
General Abstract attached in the DPRs, the seignorage charge is again
considered, which is around 3-4% of the total cost.
 Status of Marketing Reforms
Sl. Area of Reforms Status of marketing reforms adopted
No.
1. Establishment of private market Yes
2. Direct wholesale purchase of agricultural Yes
produce from agriculturists (Direct marketing)
3. Establishment of farmer- consumer market in NO
private sector (Direct sale by the producer to
the consumer in retail)
4. Contract Farming Yes

5. Provision for e-trading, Yes

6. Single point levy of market fee across the Yes

State/UT

7. Unified single trading licence for State/UT Yes

8. De-regulation of marketing of fruits and Yes

vegetables

Note: Arunachal Pradesh has completely adopted the Model APLM Act, 2017. Uttar
Pradesh and Chhattisgarh have partially adopted the provisions of the Model Act
while Punjab has adopted only selected provisions of the Model Act.
 Maintenance
(to be borne by State Government)
Value in % w.r.t
Item Remarks
Lakhs Const. Cost.
PMGSY-III
5 Years Routine
7,440.87 5.55% Can be agreed to.
Maintenance cost
6th Year’s Renewal
27,501.46 20.52% Can be agreed to.
coat

13
 R & D Proposals
Technology No of Roads Length in Km

Waste Plastics 45 119.55

Cold Mix Technology 11 41.02
Cement Stabilization 3 6.30
CMR BitPlast* 2 10.50
Coir Technology for sub-grade
improvement*
4 21.05
None* 55 422.39
Geo-Textile * 16 62.91
Terrazyme* 2 6.36
Total 138 690.08

*DPRs prepared using IRC Accredited materials needs to be verified at

NRIDA at least one in each technology.

14
 R&D Technology
Sl Description Minimum Length Percentage
No length to proposed in of R& D
be Km roads with
proposed respect to
in Km total length

1 Technology with IRC 195.57 166.87 8.53%

Specification (Main
streaming of
Technology) – 10%

2. Technology with IRC 97.79 523.21 26.75%

Accreditation - 5%

State needs to propose adequate length using Mainstreaming

technology as per New Technology initiative guidelines.
 Details of proposal on OMMAS

Item Number of Uploaded on STA

proposals in OMMAS scrutinized
current Batch as
State’s report

PMGSY-III 248 248 248

Roads
LSBs 3 3 3
 Block Overview
Total Blocks 685

Blocks in Batch-I 100

Blocks in Batch-II 213

Blocks common between 10

both batches

Blocks with no proposals in 382

both batches combined
Approx only 300 km left in upcoming batch
Trace Map Cut – Quality of Roads

Min. Trace Map Numbers %

1 to 5 99 40%

5 - 15 105 42%

16 to 50 42 17%

51 to 100 2 0%

 Total 248

Average size of AP Blocks is 63 Rural Roads, Top-15

doesn’t mean the same thing as other States almost
double the average block size.
 Equity
Too less roads
proposed

Too many
proposals in
Chittoor
Aspirations Districts

District Blocks Proposed

Blocks
Visakhapatnam 43 16
YSR Kapada 51 33
Vizianagaram 34 19

Visakhapatnam is not
saturated enough
 Exceptional Blocks
Blocks with high proposals
District Block % DRRP Length Being
Proposed
Chittoor Ramasamudram 17%
Chittoor Nagalapuram 15%
Anantapur Puttaparthi 15%
Chittoor Kurabalakota 13%
Y S R Kadapa Simhadripuram 13%
Chittoor Mandanpalle 12%

Eg. Chittoor Ramasamudram block –

The total block rural road length is
194 km and 33 km are being taken in
PMGSY3
Action: SQC/NQM visit on proposed roads to check
eligibility of roads being proposed.
A lot of earthen roads proposed Chittoor and YSR
 Exceptional Blocks
Large blocks not considered in B1 or B2
District Block DRRP Length Number of Roads

Visakhapatnam* Ananthagiri 620.73 138

Visakhapatnam* Gudem Kothaveedhi 583.446 120
Visakhapatnam* Munchingiputtu 582.331 167
Visakhapatnam* Gangaraju Madugula 577.85 152
East Godavari Chintur 518.8 100
Y S R Kadapa* Kondapuram 489.729 146
Visakhapatnam* Pedabayalu 479.63 113
Visakhapatnam* Hukumpeta 472.583 128
Srikakulam Seethampeta 466.824 150
Visakhapatnam* Koyyuru 451.045 104
Y S R Kadapa* Peddamudium 443.65 102

These are large road networks as per Andhra Pradesh

Blocks, but proposed roads are not adequate.

*Aspirational Districts
 Exclusions in Priority

423 high priority roads have been excluded in CUCPL

Land Issue reason is used the most
 Planning Checks
1. Highly unsatisfactory habitation mapping to
roads leading to wrong priorities
2. High ranking trace map roads not combined
and rejected by system
3. Discontinuous candidate roads
4. Earthen roads not necessarily missing links

Utility Value is centre of PMGSY road selection.

Wrongful habitation mapping by PIU leads to
wrong Utility Values and CUCPL generated
 District Block
Y S R Kadapa Rayachoti

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

Excess habitation
(T01)-Rayachoty -T.sundupalli road 2
30 mapping,insufficient
to Mallayagutta palli (Proposed)
habitation maping, .
 District Block
Y S R Kadapa Rayachoti

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

(MRL03)-Gunnikuntla road to 3 Excess habitation

Kummara palli via Chennamukka (Not 2 mapping,insufficient
palli Proposed) habitation mapping, .
 District Block
Y S R Kadapa V N Palli

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

Excess habitation
2
(MRL01)-Animela to Gangireddipalli 26 mapping,insufficient
(Proposed)
habitation maping. .
 District Block
Y S R Kadapa V N Palli

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

Excess habitation
(T02)-N.Palagiri to Gangireddipalli 1 mapping,insufficient
14
via Pochamreddipalli, Sangalapalli (Proposed) habitation
maping,merging issue. .
 District Block
Y S R Kadapa V N Palli

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

6
(T05)-Animela to V.N.Palli at Insufficient habitation
(Not 3
Yeramalapalli road via N.Palagiri mapping,
Proposed)
 District Block
Krishna Pamarru

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

(MRL17)-MV road to Uruturu to

7 Insufficient habitation
Satyanarayanapuram to 33
(Proposed) mapping,.
Kurmapuram via Yadavapuram
 District Block
Krishna Pamarru

Trace map
GIS GIS

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

Insufficient habitation
(MRL04) Kathipudi Pamarru NH road 14 (not mapping further only 2
4
at 243 0 to Z golvepalli via Baliparu Proposed) habitation are mapped
having no facility.
 District Block
Krishna Unguturu

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

(MRL03)-TVV road at J.Kandriga 7 Excess Habitation

25
to Moparru via Mukkapadu, (Proposed) Mapping,.
Vinjarampadu
 District Block
Krishna Unguturu

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

14
(T02) TVV road from Telaprolu to Insufficient habitation
(Not 1
Indupalli upto mandal limits mapping,.
Proposed)
 District Block
Krishna Bapulapadu

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank
(MRL01)-MNK road at
Mirjapuram to Chillaboinapalli 18 Insufficient habitation
24
via Billanapalli, Madicherla (Proposed) mapping.
 District Block
Krishna Bapulapadu

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank
(T02)
21
Veeravalli to Nuzvid via Insufficient habitation
(Not 5
Rangannagudem, Singannagudem, mapping.
Proposed
Malavalli up to Mandal Limits
Block Redo District Block
Srikakulam Vajrapukothur
u

Road Name CUCPL Rank Trace Map Rank Remark

T shape
T08 Deppuru to Bahadapalli 6 ( Proposed) 81 proposed(Complete
length proposed)
 District Block
West Godavari Narasapuram

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

Merging issue further

(MRL02)Road from LB Cherla R and B
5 road length is proposed
road to NSP Vemuladeevi R and B 49
(proposed) is more than that appear
road via Sarava, Pedalanka, S Thippa
in QGIS.
 District Block
West Godavari Narasapuram

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

Could be combined with

T02 NARASAPURAM MOGALTHURU R 14 (not other road and also
2
AND B ROAD TO YS PALEM proposed) insufficient habitation
mapping
 District Block
Krishna Kaikalur

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

17 (not Insufficient habitation

(T04) Alapadu to Gundugolanu 4
proposed) mapping
 District Block
Kurnool Gadivemula

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank
(T01) 7
Gadivemula to Regadagudur via Insufficient habitation
(Not 1
Korrapolur mapping.
Proposed)
 District Block
Chittoor Vijaya Puram

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

(T16) NK Road to Pillasipalem upto 1 Excess habitation

31
state border (Proposed) mapping
Blocks Rejected on Planning Basis
Sr District Block
Existing Proposals are 1 Y S R Kadapa Rayachoti
Based on Wrong 2 Y S R Kadapa V N Palli
Priorities 3 Y S R Kadapa Vemula
1. Delete CUCPL & 4 Y S R Kadapa B Mattam
Proposals 5 Krishna Pamarru
2. Redo habitation 6 Krishna Unguturu
mapping 7 Krishna Bapulapadu
3. Merge high trace 8 Krishna Kaikalur
map rank roads 9 Krishna Nandigana
4. Point (2,3) under 10 Srikakulam Vajrapukothuru
SRRDA supervision 11 West Godavari Narasapuram
5. Re-generate CUCPL 12 Prakasam Inkollu
6. Bring proposals as 13 Guntur Ponnur
per correct new 14 Guntur Bapatla
priority 15 Guntur Amruthalur
16 Kurnool Gadivemula
17 Chittoor Vijaya Puram
Screenshots from all 18 Chittoor Mandanpalle
these Blocks are in 19 Chittoor Kalakada
annexure ppt
 District Block
Kurnool Gudur

State to
verify what
is the
alignment
in DPR

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

T02-Gudur to Peddanelatur via 7

27 Merging issue
Pulakurthy (Proposed)
 District Block
Guntur Macherla

1.4 State to
km verify what
is the
alignment
in DPR

Trace Map
Road Name CUCPL Rank Remark
Rank

As per ommas road

length is 5km but as
T02-Gannavaram to Paluvai 5(proposed) 21
per QGIS road length
is coming only 1.4km
 Earthen Roads
1. 56% roads proposed are track/mooram/gravel.
2. PMGSY-III allows missing links – but not all of these
are missing links to Through Routes or Major Rural
Links.
3. Many such in Chittoor and YSR Kadapa
The program will focus on upgradation of existing TR/MRL based on
priority giving importance to critical facilities like the rural markets and
education & health facilities. However, new construction may be
allowed only as a part of upgradation project to connect Agricultural and
Rural Markets/warehouses, Government hospitals and Educational
Institutions, in case they are not connected already with a metalled road
or require strengthening and widening of existing roads.
 Earthen Total
District BT Proposals %
Proposals Proposals

Chittoor 3 27 30 90%

Prakasam 3 16 19 84%

Krishna 5 21 26 81%

Y S R Kadapa 11 32 43 74%

Kurnool 7 10 17 59%
 District TRACE MAP
Block name WORK NAME CUPL RANK Remark
Name RANK

MRL02-Road from LB Cherla

R and B road to NSP Merging issue
West
Narasapuram Vemuladeevi R and B road 5 49 and Complete
Godavari
via Sarava, Pedalanka, S Earthen Road
Thippa

100% Earthen
Roads
Not creating big
shortcuts either
 District Block TRACE MAP
WORK NAME CUPL RANK Remark
Name name RANK

T02-NH 71 (Palacentre) to
Mandanp Enumulavaripalle via Complete
Chittoor 2 28
alle Vandadivaripalle,KothaGandlap Earthen Road
alle,Kondamarivaripalle

100% Earthen
Roads
Not MRL/TR or big
short-cuts
District Block TRACE MAP
WORK NAME CUPL RANK Remark
Name name RANK

Amruthalu T03-Kuchipudi to Pedaravuru Complete

Guntur 13 44
r via Yedavur Earthen Road

100% Earthen
Roads
Not MRL/TR or big
short-cuts
District Block TRACE MAP
WORK NAME CUPL RANK Remark
Name name RANK

MRL17-MV road to Uruturu to Link Route

Krishna Pamarru Satyanarayanapuram to 13 33 and also
Kurmapuram Earthen Road
 TRACE MAP
District Name Block name WORK NAME CUPL RANK Remark
RANK
Complete
Earthen Road
Y S R Kadapa V N Palli MRL01-Animela to Gangireddipalli 2 26 Doesn’t severve
the objective of
PMGSY-III

Proposed
Earthen
Road
 Completely Earthen roads need to be re-
considered if they are actually meeting our
guidelines or need to be dropped
 Roads Having PCI > 2, Eligible Only for RQI,
But average cost Considered is more than 50 lakhs/km
TOTAL
Minimum TOTAL RIDING AVERA
Length CARRIA COST
District Trace Eligible LENGTH QUALIT GE
Sr.No Block name WORK NAME PACKAGE ID having GE OF
Name Map Length Propose Y COST
PCI>2 WIDTH PROJEC
Rank d LENGTH PER KM
T

T05-Pesaravai to
1 Kurnool Gadivemula 24 AP10PIII06 6.99 6.99 6.99 0.00 3.75 530.00 75.78
Regadagudur

T01-NH16 to CSP road via

2 Srikakulam Srikakulam Sastrulapeta and 6 AP18PIII13 5.13 5.13 5.10 0.00 3.75 307.00 60.20
Saniwada

T05- Baruva to Ratti via

Moolapolam,Gollavuru,R
3 Srikakulam Sompeta 10 AP18PIII19 7.82 10.73 10.39 0.00 3.75 998.85 96.14
ajam, Yeeramukham,
Dunnavuru

MRL13-
East Rampachod AP05PIII
4 Rampachodavaram to 9 9.30 9.30 9.45 0.00 3.75 503.58 53.29
Godavari avaram RCV 01
Busiguem (via) Rampa

SQC report and reconsideration of cost and DPR needs to checked

 District TRACE MAP
Block name WORK NAME CUPL RANK Remark
Name RANK

T01-NH16 to CSP road via Road in good

Srikakulam Srikakulam 13 6
Sastrulapeta and Saniwada condition

Remark By PIU:
Badly damaged Bt surface

Remark By PIU:
Badly damaged CC surface
Andhra Pradesh
SANCTIONED, COMPLETED, BALANCE AND UNAWARDED WORKS
TYPE OF WORK-ROADS
SANCTIONED COMPLETED
BALANCE ROAD UNAWARDED
S. No SCHEME LENGTH LENGTH BALANCE LENGTH
Nos. LENGTH (Km) Nos.
(Km) (Km) (Km)
352.88 24.60
1 PMGSY I 4,439 13,769.21 4,329 13,005.61 (110 Nos.) (4 Nos.)
40.10 10.85
2. PMGSY-II 174 1,330.95 169 1,252.07 (5 Nos.) (2 Nos.)
935.84 935.84
3. PMGSY-III 129 935.84 - - (129 Nos.) (129 Nos.)

TYPE OF WORK-LSBs

BALANCE
SANCTIONED COMPLETED UNAWARDED
S.No SCHEME (NOs.)
(NOs.) (NOs.) (NOs.)

1 PMGSY I 255 227 28 -

2. PMGSY-II 2 2 0 -
3. PMGSY-III - - - -
 WEST BENGAL
Andhra Pradesh
MONTH-WISE TARGETS OF LENGTH TO BE CONSTRUCTED

Apr. May Jun July Aug Sep Oct. Nov Dec Jan Feb. Mar Total Hab.

T 15 60 75 20 30 50 175 105 70 40 60 100 800 45

A 2 13 17 13 11 29 18 50 43 30 32 63
C 2 15 32 45 56 85 103 153 196 226 258

Achievement 258 km (36.85%) against target of 700 km as on 04.03.2020.

HABITATION COVERAGE REPORT

% of Habitations
Habitations
Category Eligible Habitations Habitations Cleared Connected w.r.t
Connected
cleared

250+ 1636 1234 1197 97.00

100-249 417 202 112 55.44

Total: 2053 1436 1309 91.15

 WEST BENGAL
Andhra Pradesh
LAYER WISE LENGTH-IN PROGRESS ROAD (km)

In Progress
Preparatory Earthwork Sub-base Base Surface
SCHEME Sanction Misc.
Work Subgrade Preparation Course Course
Length
PMGSY-I 438.095 323.211 281.170 172.562 158.347 109.011 1.330
PMGSY-II - - - - - - -

Maintenance – Financial (As per Manual Report)

Unsatisfactory % based on NQM

% Expenditure inspections ( Under DLP )
Amount
Amount Amount w.r.t
Credited
Year (s) required as Utilized by maintenance
in account
per Contract SRRDA funds Total Nos. “U” Nos. U%
of SRRDA
Required

2014-15 16.34 16.34 10.18 62% 4 0 0.00%

2015-16 8.31 20.29 5.96 72% 11 4 36.36%
2016-17 8.85 8.85 4.94 56% 11 0 0.00%
2017-18 10.53 10.53 8.06 77% 48 0 0.00%
2018-19 12.32 12.32 9.08 74% 62 1 1.61%
2019-20 (Upto
15.43 0.00 8.10 52% 59 6 10.17%
Jan. 2020)
Total: 71.78 68.33 46.32 65% 195 11 5.64%
 WEST BENGAL
Andhra Pradesh

Status of Schedule of Rates

SoR 2019-20 - Approved

 ANDHRA PRADESH

eMARG STATUS
Admin 1
STATE LEVEL Coordinator 1
Others 1
USER REGISTRATION PIU 20
DISTRICT
Others 441

Total: 464
Total Workable Packages 453
Freezed Packages 447

PROGRESS ON PACKAGES Locked Packages 399

Pending With States for Freezing 6

Manual Expenditure Entered 131

Total No. of contractors 165

CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION
STATUS Total No. of contractors registered 141

Total No. Of Districts 13

DSC ENROLMENT
No. Of Successful Enrollments 13
Andhra Pradesh
Quality Mechanism

Pre-EC:-05.03.2020
 Andhra Pradesh as on 02.03.2020
Quality Control - 1 ,2 & 3 tier
st nd rd

Geo referenced Field Lab Details in OMMAS(1st tier)

No. of Ongoing Lab Established Lab not Established
As on Package
Total More than
6 months
March. 2020 40 17
125 85
(as on 02.03.2020) (32.00%) (13.6%)

Works not inspected by SQM even once(2nd tier)

Contractor wise Inspections(sanction year 2013-19) (3rd tier)

State No. of Contractors No. of Contractors for No. of Contractors whose % of contractors
Involved which at least one work works have not been whose works have not
inspected by NQM inspected by NQMs at all been inspected by
NQMs
AP 206 205 1 0.48%
 Quality Control – 3rd tier Andhra Pradesh as on 02.03.2020
Pending ATR
Completed Ongoing works

Pending at NRRDA Pending with state Pending at NRRDA Pending with state
Year Requir
Require Regra Regra
For Required ed For Required
d Initially ded For Not ded For Not
TC/Verific clarificatio Initially TC/Verific clarificatio
approval submitted approval submitted
ation n ation n

> 5 year
44 44 0 0 0 0 45 44 0 0 1 0
(10-15)

>4 year
15 15 0 0 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 0
(15-16)

>3 year
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0
(16-17)

(17-19) 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 10 0 1 0 0

Apr’19- 2 0 0 2 0 0 11 3 0 2 6 0
Till date

0 0 0 0 0 3 7 0
Total 62 60 113 103
0 0 3 7
 Andhra Pradesh as on 02.03.2020

‘Unsatisfactory’ work grading

50.0%
38.7%
40.0% 36.8%

30.0% 24.1%
21.1% 20.5%
6.7%
20.0% 12.2%
14.7%
12.2% 13.3%
11.6%
10.5% 10.7%11.1%
10.0% 0.0% 5.4%
4.6% 3.4% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0%
0.0%
2011-14 2012-15 2013-16 2014-17 2015-18 2016-19 2017-February'20
Completed works Ongoing works Maintenance works

Overall Unsatisfactory Quality grading trends reported by NQMs (ending February’2020)

(April’17- February’20)

Completed Works Ongoing works Maintenance works

Total Ins. ‘U’ (in nos.) ‘U’ (in %) Total Ins. ‘U’ (in nos.) ‘U’ (in %) Total Ins. ‘U’ (in nos.) ‘U’ (in %)

30 0 0.00% 147 8 5.44% 268 55 20.52%

(April’11- February’20)
Completed Re-graded = 0.00% On-Going Re-graded = 1.49% Maintenance Re-graded =17.10%

(Target : To Achieve 95% satisfactory grading in Completed work & 85% Satisfactory grading
in work under Maintenance Period for Financial Year 2019-20).
 Andhra Pradesh as on 02.03.2020

‘Unsatisfactory’ work grading

28.6% 27.7%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0% 15.6% 16.7%
15.0% 11.9%
8.3% 7.1%
10.0% 4.0% 4.6%
5.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-Feb'20
completed works Ongoing works Maintenance work
Overall Unsatisfactory Quality grading trends reported by NQMs (ending February 2020)
Completed Works Ongoing works Maintenance works
Year Total Ins. ‘U’ (in nos.) ‘U’ (in %) Total Ins. ‘U’ (in nos.) ‘U’ (in %) Total Ins. ‘U’ (in nos.) ‘U’ (in %)
2015-16 32 5 15.63% 120 10 8.33% 14 4 28.57%

2016-17 9 0 0.00% 25 1 4.00% 17 0 0.00%

2017-18 2 0 0.00% 19 0 0.00% 59 7 11.86%

2018-19 7 0 0.00% 44 2 4.55% 90 15 16.67%

2019-20 21 0 0.00% 84 6 7.14% 119 33 27.73%

(Target : To Achieve 95% satisfactory grading in Completed work & 85% Satisfactory grading
in work under Maintenance Period for Financial Year 2019-20).
 Andhra Pradesh as on 02.03.2020

Layer Wise Unsatisfactory %

100%
56%
50% 38%33% 33% 33%
13%11% 22% 11% 19%
0%
0%
Geometrics CD works Sub Base Base Course BT works Deficiency in Functioning of
QC register Lab
SRI U

Detail Geometric CD Works Sub Base Base BT Works Quality Issues

Course
Deficiency in Functioning of
QC register Lab

Grading SRI/U SRI/U U U U SRI/U SRI/U

Deficiency 6/3 2/1 3 2 1 0/5 3/3
Found in

Reasons S/E & E/W not Poor material & Inadequate Thickness of Surface QC record & Quality
proper Workmanship Grain size, WBM & Grain Unevenness & registers not arrangement on
Plasticity & size not Thickness of proper site not proper
compaction proper layer not proper

Based on total 570 inspections accounted from 1/4/2017 to 29/02/2020

Out of these 16 SRI inspections & 09 Unsatisfactory Inspections
 Andhra Pradesh as on 02.03.2020

Layer Wise Maintenance Unsatisfactory %

100% 84% 88% 88% 89% 84%
66% 59%
48%
50% 36%
16%
0% 0%
0%
A B C D E F
SRI U

Detail Maintenance of Maintenance of

road in respect road signs and
to Restoration Condition of Maintenance White washing Maintenance
of rain cuts and Pavement of drains, guard stones, of guard rails
Restoration of
Cutting of including filling Maintenance Re-fixing and parapet
rain cuts and
branches of pot holes and of culverts displaced guard rails,
dressing of berms
trees, shrubs patch repairs and cause stones, White Maintenance
and making up of
and trimming of etc ways washing of 200 m and
shoulders
grass and weeds parapets of C.D. Kilo Meter
(B) (C) (D) stones
etc Works
(A) (E) (F)

Grading SRI/U SRI/U SRI/U SRI/U SRI/U SRI/U

Deficiency 21/47 0/49 0/49 7/37 26/50 16/47

Found in

268 Maintenance work inspections have been conducted during Apr’17 to Feb’2020.
Out of these 44 SRI inspections & 56 Unsatisfactory Inspections
 State Level Quality Indicator National Level

Work graded Satisfactory by NQM ( Apr'17 to Feb'20) Work graded Satisfactory by NQM ( Apr'17 to Feb'20)
Completed works Ongoing works Maintenance work Completed works Ongoing works Maintenance work
100.00% 94.56% 79.48% 92.78% 92.21% 74.48%

ATR submitted by State ATR submitted by State

Total ATR required Submitted ATR In % Total ATR required Submitted ATR In %
175 168 96% 12582 11079 88%

Lab Status Lab Status

Ongoing package Lab established in % Ongoing package Lab established in %

125 85 68% 14604 12630 86%

Contractor wise inspection during (2013-19) Contractor wise inspection during (2013-19)
Contractrors
Total contractors involved In % Total contractors involved Contractrors inspected In %
inspected
206 205 99.5% 12383 10156 82%
 Andhra Pradesh
Finance & Account for F.Y 2018-19
(Pre Empowered Committee Meeting : 05-03-2020)
Amount (Rs. in Crore)

S. Observation As on 31- As on 02-

N. 03-2019 03-2020
Programme Fund:
1. Diversion of Fund :
- Prog. to Admin Fund 2.00
2. Outstanding Advances
- Mobilization 1.63 1.63
- Machinery 0.58 0.58
- DPR Preparation 0.18 0.18
3. Negative figure shown under Head No. 21.01 (-) 19.86 (-) 19.25
(Interest received from Bank Account)
Others:
1. Non Submission of Audited Balance Sheet of Maintenance Fund
Account.
2. No reply has been received for Financial observation sent to the state
(sent on 05-12-2019)
 Andhra Pradesh-Fund Position
Amount (Rs. in Crore))

S.No Particulars Upto 02nd Mar.,19 upto 31st Mar.19

(F.Y 2019-20) (F.Y 2018-19)

I Opening Balance as on 01st April 270.00 140.19

II Allocation for during the year 500.00 195.50
III Fund Release by GOI 243.14 195.50
IV Fund Received by SRRDA from GOI 111.85 135.39
V Fund Received as State Share 74.57 171.99
VI Other Receipt 1.17 45.33
VII Total Fund Available (i+iv+v+vi) 457.59 492.90
VIII Contractor Deposit 66.67 55.59
IX Actual Fund Available for Use (vii – viii) 390.92 437.31
X Expenditure 198.98 235.73
XI Effect of Other Assets & Liabilities (-) 6.36 (-) 12.83
XII Utilized during the year (x+xi) 192.62 222.90
XIII Percentage of Expenditure Incurred (X/IX*100) 50.90 53.90
XIV Balance Fund Available (VII-XII) 264.97 270.00
XV Balance Fund Available (Excl Contractor Deposit) {IX-XII) 198.30 214.41

Note: Central share pending to be released from State Treasury (as on 02-03-20 ): 243.14 Crore

State share pending to be released from State Treasury (as on 02-03-20 ) : 160.09 Crore

Total share pending to be released from State Treasury (as on 02-03-20 ) : 403.23 Crore
 Details of Completed Works Pending Financial Closure-
Andhra Pradesh
(As on 02-03-2020)
Physical Physically Financially Pending Financial
Completion Completed Completed Completion
Year Works Works
2001-09 2809 2809 0
2009-10 629 627 2
2010-16 923 923 0
2016-17 100 99 1
2017-18 52 47 5
2018-19 55 48 7
2019-20 168 53 115
4736 4606 130(2.74%)
• Out of 130 works, 65(50%) are pending for more than 180 days.
Thank you