Compare culture of five

countries based on Hofstede’s

Cultural Dimensions
Made by: Nitin
Mitul
Riyal
Adarsh
Purusharth
Jasmeet
29.09.14 1
2

Introduction

• Gerard Hendrik (Geert) Hofstede

(born 2 October 1928 in Haarlem)
– Dutch social psychologist,
former IBM employee, and
Professor Emeritus of
Organizational Anthropology and
International Management at
Maastricht University in the
Netherlands
• For his cultural dimensions study
he interviewed 117,000 IBM
employees in 23 countries
initially
3

Table of contents
1. Power Distance
2. Individualism / Collectivism
3. Masculinity
4. Uncertainty avoidance
5. Long term orientation
6. Indulgence / Restraint
4

POWER DISTANCE
(PD) HOFSTEDE 1 ST

DIMENSION

This refers to the degree of inequality that exists

and is accepted among people with and
without power
5

Comparison
High PD Low PD

• Centralized companies • Flatter organizations

• Strong hierarchies • Supervisors and
• Large gaps in employees are
compensation, authority, considered almost as
and respect equals
6

Example

Malaysia?

Finland?
7
Finland (33)
• Equal rights
• Superiors accessible
• Power is decentralized
• Managers count on the
experience of their team
members
• Attitude towards managers
are informal and on first
name basis
Malaysia (100)
• People accept a hierarchical
order
• Power is centralized
• Subordinates expect to be
told what to do
• The ideal boss is a respected
autocrat
8

Challenges as an international manager

• Finnish manager has Solutions:
marketing project with •Finnish manager should
a CEO from Malaysia learn in details about
 Finnish manager company’s hierarchy,
receives less respect responsibilities of each
than top managers department beforehand
from the same •Finnish manager should
company show great respect to
 Malaysian CEO refused Malaysian CEO despite
to provide any answers any misunderstandings
on marketing field
 Individualism &
Collectivism (IND)
Hofstede 2nd Dimension

This dimension focuses on the relationship

between the individual and larger social
groups. The way in which people define
themselves and their relationship to others.

29.09.14l 9
10

Comparison
Individualist Collectivist
• Individual is most • Views of group most
important important
• Independence over • High obligation to
dependence • the group
• Rewards individual Self is defined in relation to
achievement • others
• Values uniqueness of Cooperation, not
individual competition

29.09.14
11

Example
South Korea?

USA?

29.09.14
12

United States (90) South Korea (18)

• People taking care of themselves
• Identity based on individual
• Decisions based on individual
needs
• Emphasis on individual initiative
and achievement
• Everyone has a right to a private
life
• Expect absolute loyalty to group
• Decisions based on group
• Identity based on social system
• High dependence on organization
and institutions
• Emphasis on belonging
• Private life “invaded” by institution
and organizations

29.09.14
 Masculinity (MAS)
Hofstede’s 3rd Dimension
The degree of masculinity indicates
whether a society leans more
towards masculine values, or
towards feminine ones.
 Comparison
Masculinity values
• a high importance of
achievement
• material gain
• competition
 success is being the
best
 E x p e c t women to have
different roles than men
Femininity values
• relationship building
• equality
• a good quality of life
 success is enjoying
what you do
 Societi es differentiate less
between genders
 Example

Japan?

Sweden?
 Sweden (5)
• the manager should support the employees
• managers strive for consensus, conflicts are
solved by compromising
• people value equality & solidarity
• incentives : free time & flexible working
hours
• important to include everyone
• no sense of superiority
 Japan (95)
• long working hours, extremely hard working
(hard for women to participate)
• life is a constant competition
• people are motivated if they are fighting with
a winning team
• drive for excellence and perfection
 Challenges as an international manager
• The Japanese want to work longer hours than the
Swedish ones
 a lack of motivation among Japanese
 fe l t pressure and lack of motivation among
Swedish
• Solution:
– show Japanese the company is successful anyway
– draw up work schedule to reduce pressure of staying
longer
Uncertainty avoidance
index (UAI)
Hofstede 4th Dimension
 20

Uncertainty Avoidance Index

• The degree of anxiety that society members feel when in uncertain or unknown
situations
• Focuses on the level of tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity within the society.
21
Comparison
High uncertainty
• Very formal business
conduct with lots of
rules and policies
• Need and expect structure
• Sense of nervousness
spurns high levels of emotion
and expression
Low uncertainty
• Informal business attitude
• More concern with long
term strategy than what is
happening on a daily basis
• Accepting of change and
risk
 Example

Japan?

USA?
23

USA (46)
• Acceptance for new ideas and innovation
• Do not require many rules
• High trust in the state
• Thoughts are shared with colleagues / boss
• Feedback and criticism are accepted

29.09.14
24

Japan (92)
• Japanese taught to prepare for any uncertain
situation  avoid any risk
• Ceremonies for all aspects of life
• Much emphasis on etiquette
• It is not accepted to have a disagreement with
your employer
• Questions only answered if the answer is
absolutely certain
29.09.14
25

Challenges as an international
manager
• International team, US team members express an idea
for innovation
 US team members want to go ahead immediately
 Japanese team members wish to take their time to make
absolutely sure that all details are known

Solution: Create a detailed project plan which is efficient

but also has relatively low risk

29.09.14
Long term orientation
versus
short term normative
(LTO)

Hofstede 5th Dimension

Long Term Orientation & Short Term
Normative
• 5thdimension
• Added in 1990s
• Confucian
• philosophy
• Different
culture
• different
decision
Society  long term orientation / short term
normative.
 Comparison
Long Term Orientation Short Term Normative
• Prepare for the future • Tradition and norms are
• Thrift and effort is more important
largely encouraged • View the societal change
• Ability to adapt with suspicion
traditions in changed • Focus on achieving quick
condition results instead of long
• Perseverance in term benefit
achieving
result
 Example

Egypt
？

South
Korea
？
 South Korea (100)
• Society is more pragmatic and long term
orientated
• Almighty God is not familiar to South
Koreans
• People guided by virtues and practical good
examples
• Serve the durability of the companies.
• Serve the stakeholders and society at large
for many generations to come.
 Egypt (7)
• Indicates that the society is very normative
• Strong concern with establishing the absolute
Truth
• Normative in their thinking
• Exhibit great respect for traditions
• Small propensity to save for the future
• Focus on achieving quick results
 Challenges as an international manager

• Challenges
• Egypt company Profi t in three months
• South Korea company Increase in market share
after three years
• Cooperation fail  No same objective
• Understand the culture and come up with an win-
win proposal to satisfy both objective is
important.
33

Indulgence vs. Restraint (IVR)

Hofstede 6th Dimension

•Added as sixth dimension in 2010.

•Less data, fewer countries.
•Not yet fully adopted within the intercultural training
and management.
•Is the data valid? (Asking participants ”how happy are
you?”.)

24.09.14
 34

Comparison

Restraint
•Strict social norms
•Lower % of happy people
•Positive emotions not freely
expressed
•A perception of helplessness:
what happens to me is not my
own doing
•Leisure time not given much
importance
Indulgence
•Free gratification
•Individual happiness and leisure time
are important
•Higher % of people declaring
themselves very happy
•Positive emotions freely expressed and
remembered
•Loose gender roles

24.09.14
 South Korea?

Sweden?
 Sweden (78)
• Employees cannot easily be motivated with
material rewards
• Enjoying the moment rather than use time to
compare to others
• No need for status objects
• Employees encouraged to speak up
• Incentives like free time, flexible work hours and
places are effective
 South Korea(29)
• Material reward is expected
• Employees easily feel treated unfairly
• Status objects are important
• Very hierarchical working environment, lower employees do
not voice their own opinions
• People live to work, employees are expected to work as late
as the boss
• Indulging and using too much money on yourself is thought
of as wrong
38

Challenges as an international manager

• South Korean organization in Sweden expects
employees to work overtime frequently for
higher pay
 High employee turnover rate

• Solution:
– Hire more employees so that overtime is not
necessary  flexible working hours and free time
29.09.14
39

References
• http://geert-hofstede.com/dimensions.html
• http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_66.htm
• http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html
• http://www.communicaid.com/cross-cultural-training/blog/indulgence-
vs-restraint-6th-dimension/#.VCQmNk0riUk

29.09.14
40

Thank you!

29.09.14