Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Training 101
10 March 2017
Agenda
Page 2
CMBS Deal Types
Private-label Deals and Agency Deals
Page 3
Private-label CMBS Deals
Page 4
Private-label CMBS Bond Structure
JPMCC 2017-JP5 Conduit
Page 5
Agency (Freddie) CMBS Deals
Freddie KF and KJ Platforms
Page 6
Agency CMBS Deal Types
Wide range of Agency CMBS deal types under Freddie “K Series”
► Freddie K Series:
► K-000: multifamily with various terms, primarily 10-year
► K-F00: floating-rate
► K-J00: junior-lien
► K-P00: seasoned loans
► K-S00: multifamily (seniors housing)
► K-ABC: single-borrower
► MM00: tax exempt loans
Page 7
Agency CMBS Deals
High-Level: how do Freddie K-Series deals generally work?
Page 8
Agency CMBS Deals
High-Level: how do Freddie K-Series deals generally work?
► Origination:
► The asset pool is focused on recently-originated multifamily loans, the vast majority
of which support affordable rental housing.
► Multifamily rental housing is considered commercial – rather than residential – real
estate because these properties are developed and purchased for investment only.
► Collateral Tie Out:
► EY will work with Freddie primarily through the due diligence and tape tie out
process
► Thereafter will work with third-party banks on the offering documents.
► Structure:
► Two classes of bonds: guaranteed senior bonds and a related underlying private-
label trust that includes unguaranteed bonds known as subordinate and mezzanine
classes.
► Should credit losses materialize, those losses are initially borne by the private
investors who have purchased the subordinate bond.
Page 9
Agency CMBS Deals
High-Level: how do Freddie K-Series deals generally work?
► Investment Banks:
► Typically lead or co-managers/book runner(s) (e.g. Morgan Stanley and Credit
Suisse) act as third-party for the purchase of non-guaranteed certificates and
placement agent for guaranteed certificates.
► EY works with banks during the term sheet and offering document tie-out process.
► Rating Agencies:
► Class A are the senior certificates, which Freddie Mac guarantees.
► The senior guaranteed certificates (approximately $1 billion of the $1.2 billion in the
security) typically carry a AAA rating based solely on the quality of the underlying
collateral, and not based on the Freddie Mac guarantee.
► Rating agencies conduct independent reviews of the loans; typically, each fixed-
rate K-Deal is rated by two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations.
► Investor Base:
► Diversified, including conventional real estate investors who may view subordinate
bonds like other real estate equity investments; large institutional investors such as
life insurance companies and pension fund managers seeking high yield on
mezzanine bonds; and major financial institutions that treat the senior bonds as an
alternative to Treasury bonds.
Page 10
Hybrid Deal Types
Commercial Real Estate (CRE) - CLO
Single-Family Rental (SFR)
Page 11
Hybrid CRE Deal Types
Page 12
Typical CMBS Transaction Review Process
Page 13
3 Key Phases of EY’s CMBS Transaction Review
1.
1. Loan
Loan File
File to
to Data
Data File
File Due
Due 2.
2. Red
Red Preliminary
Preliminary Offering
Offering 3.
3. Black
Black Print
Print
Diligence
Diligence Review
Review and
and Close
Close
Page 14
The Focus of our Analysis:
Loan-Level and Property-Level Due Diligence
Page 15
Loan-Level Due Diligence
Page 16
Property-Level Due Diligence
Appraisal
►Property Type, Appraised Value, Year Built/Renovated
Property Condition Report (PCR)
►Seismic Zone
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
►Recognized Environmental Conditions (Need for Phase II / Insurance / Reserve)
Rent Roll
►Square Footage / Units / Rooms, Largest Tenants, Current Occupancy, Lease Expirations
Insurance Summary
►Insurance Certificates
Underwriting
►Historical Financial Results, UW Financials (Revenue, Vacancy, Expenses, NOI, NCF),
Hotel Metrics
Page 17
CMBS vs. other SFAS Asset Classes
Overall, how is CMBS deal review unique?
CMBS has some key differences from the other asset classes, which
make it particularly unique:
Feature Level Impact
# Loans and Properties Low Review entire pool. No sampling
Unique Loan and Property High In-depth loan reviews and large #
Features of tape characteristics (200+)
Collateral Stratification Yes Exception being Single Borrowers
Loan/Prop-Specific High Top 10-15 Loans Profiled in Term
Disclosure in Offering Docs Sheet and collateral-specific
disclosures in Prelim Prospectus
Diversity in Property Types High High-profile properties (e.g. Sears
Tower, EY 5 Times, Google, Riot
Games campus) hotel, retail, mall,
office, multifamily, mixed use,
industrial, storage and
manufactured housing.
Page 18
Our Clients
Page 19
CMBS Group Client Base
Core (Investment Bank, GSE) and Emerging (SFR and CRE CLO)
Core: top banks such as JP Morgan and Goldman, as well as Freddie Mac
Page 20
Key CMBS Securitization Participants
Investment Bank and Lawyers – Our Primary Points of Contact
Accounting Firm Rating Agency Lawyers
• Evaluate collateral Rate • Outline Legal Terms
Due Legal
• Collateral tie out quality Certificates Documentation
Diligence • Oversee offering docs
• Structure tie out • Determine • Primary contact for EY
subordination levels for prospectus
review process
Deposit • AAA
• Loan Sellers Issue
Mortgage • AA
Certificates
Loans Newly Formed • A
• Deal Bookrunners CMBS Trust • BBB
• Primary contact • BB
for collateral and • B
structure tie out • NR
Page 21
CMBS Market Trends
Page 22
CMBS Issuance: Pre and Post Crisis
Primary market issuance of CMBS fell from approximately $229 billion USD in 2007 to just $3 billion USD in
2009, followed by recent strength in recovery.
Issuance (US$bn)
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Est.
Sources:
Commercial Mortgage Alert (1996-2015) Issuance (US$bn)
S&P Global Market Intelligence (2016 estimate)
Page 23
CMBS Conduit Pricing (Spread over Swaps)
Issuance and Sensitivity to Spreads
New issuance CMBS bonds are priced relative to their benchmark swap rate –i.e. a spread over the 10-year US
Treasury Rate. For example, if the pricing rate for a 10-year AAA CMBS bond is 4.25% and the 10-year Treasury
note swap is yielding 3%, then the spread is 125 basis points over the 10-year swap. Thus, a spread widening =
sign of perceived increase in credit risk
The CMBS issuance market for 2016 started with pronounced spread widening, to levels not seen since the Euro
crisis in 2011, primarily a result of broader macro volatility in global capital markets and regulatory uncertainty.
However, 2016 ended with considerably tighter spreads, as illustrated below in comparing Q1 vs. Q4 2016.
Page 24
CMBS Investor Base
Dynamic Buyer Base and Growth in Specialized Investors
This year, insurance and pension funds overtook asset managers as the primary buyers of AAAs, the former rising
from 32% of purchases in 2015 to 50% as of YE 2016, while asset managers diverted some of their attention
further down the credit quality stack, seeing their AAA share fall from 57% to 36%.
Hedge funds reduced their share of BBB purchases substantially in 2016, as the space came to be dominated by
specialized real estate investors, who also comprise the bulk of B-piece purchasers. As hedge fund demand has
faded, the same investors bidding to be the controlling certificate holder (B-piece) have stepped in, having already
completed the credit analysis.
Page 25
CMBS Investment Risk Factors
Page 26
“Wall of Maturities” and Refinance Risk
Page 27
Big Short 2.0?
CMBS, Retail, and the Rise of E-Commerce Dominance
► Deutsche Bank recommends that investors bet against two series of indexes of
commercial mortgage bonds: one from 2012, and another from 2013, a trade that
amounts to shorting the underlying securities. Those indexes have larger exposure to
malls than their more recent counterparts. Specifically, they advised buying credit
default protection on the parts of CMBX indexes that are a single step above junk,
known as the BBB- tranches.
Page 28
JP Morgan 2017 CMBS Market Outlook
Conservatively Optimistic
Regulation – Risk Retention (first effective year for CMBS). Per JP Morgan
research, the CMBS market has thus far digested RR-compliant deals
without widespread, significantly negative impact. However, the same
uncertainty expressed last year still remains as deals continue to test the
market in 2017.
Investor Demand: a notable portion of the existing buyer base of CMBS, per a
JP Morgan survey, expect to increase their allocations in 2017.
Page 29
Questions?
Page 30