Sei sulla pagina 1di 27

Experimental Confirmation of Overall

and Component Mass Balances in a


Liquid-Liquid Extraction Unit

Anna Welton-Arndt, Emily Condic, Matt Koberstine, Natalia Markiewicz, Lorenzo


Estrada, Aditya Kapoor
Introduction

Liquid-liquid extraction separates


compounds utilizing chemical potential

In this experiment, t-BuOH contaminates


a mineral oil feed and is removed by water
in the column

Ideal goal: To achieve pure mineral oil


raffinate (0% t-BuOH)

2
Introduction

3
Objectives

Main Points:

● Verify overall and component mass balances for LLE column


○ t-BuOH content measured via refractive index (RI)
○ Pump calibration and calibration curve for % t-BuOH in water/mineral oil
versus RI
● Determine how quickly feed can be run while still achieving mineral oil
purification
● Determine to what extent the feed can purified of t-BuOH

4
Approach

1. Two trials ran with varying flow speeds


a. Filled column with 4.5 L water for extraction of t-BuOH
b. Collect raffinate and water phase samples every 10 minutes; determine wt%
t-BuOH via RI
c. Time started once desired flow rate was set and pump was turned on
d. Trial ended upon consumption of feed
2. wt% t-BuOH of raffinate and water plotted versus time
3. Mass balance equation applied:
a. Overall: Feed + Stagnant Phase=Extract + Raffinate
b. Component: xtBuOH,feed *Vfeed*dfeed = xtBuOH,aq*Vaq*daq + xtBuOH,raf*Vraf*draf

5
Results - Trial 1 Mass Flow Rate t-BuOH in Raffinate

Trial 1 Conditions
● 4.73% t-butanol in feed
● Flow rate: ~390 mL/min
● 4052 mL H2O in column
● Mass in: 11.7 kg
● Mass out: 11.9 kg

6
Results - Trial 2 Mass Flow Rate t-BuOH

Trial 2 Conditions
● 7.48% t-butanol
● Flow rate: ~220 mL/min
● 4052 mL H2O

7
Results - Trial 2 Weight Percent in Water

Trial Conditions
● 7.48% t-butanol
● Flow rate: 220 mL/min
● 4052 mL H2O

8
Results - Mass Balance

Overall Mass Balance

Component Mass Balance

9
Results - Mass Balance
Trial Overall Mass In Overall Mass Difference Percent
(g) out (g) (g) Difference

1 (48 minutes) 11659 - - -

2 (73 minutes) 13714 13720 6 0.04%

Trial Tert-butanol Tert-butanol Difference Percent


Mass In (g) Mass out (g) (g) Difference

1 552 - - -

2 697 534 173 28.33%

10
Calibration Curve - wt% tBuOH in Mineral Oil (Refractive
Index)

11
Calibration Curve - wt% tBuOH in Water (Refractive Index)

12
Calibration Curve - Flow Rate of Mineral Oil Pump

13
Equipment

Column

Mineral Oil Raffinate


Mineral Oil Feed Tank Tank

Stainless Steel
Mineral Oil Feed
Water Feed Tank
Pump

14
Refractometer

Measures refractive index of liquid


samples

Model: Bausch & Lomb

15
Mineral Oil Feed Tank

Feed is a mixture of mineral oil from conical tank 16


Mineral Oil Pump

Pump records in cc H2O/minute, needs to be converted to mL


mineral oil per minute

17
Sample Collection

The volume of sample for 10 seconds was


collected in a graduated cylinder
● Every 10 minutes
● Volume recorded for ten
● seconds of flow
● Refractive index

18
Error Sources

Possible Source of error:


The outlet stream did not
flow at a constant rate

19
Mineral Oil-Water Interface

Blue Arrow: Entrance to water feed tank

Orange Arrow: Phase interface

Yellow Arrow: Initial phase interface

● Mineral Oil/Water interface line was below


the water intake

● Backflow of mineral oil into water feed tank;


likely source of error

20
Conclusion

● Difficult to determine if performance is improved at a slower or faster


feed flow rate from collected data
○ Preliminarily appears trial 1 achieved better purification (faster is
better)
● There are discrepancies between the inlet t-BuOH and the outlet of t-
BuOH due to:
○ Backflow of mineral oil feed in water feed tank
■ Contaminated stagnant water with tBuOH
○ Inconsistencies in feed flow rate (not constant)
○ Accumulation of feed in the column over run time
○ Issues with water RI measurements (contaminated with mineral oil)
21
Recommendations

● Ensure that the water-oil interface is above the water inlet pipe

○ Edit the SOP guidelines to have more pictures with this problem

● Clean the water feed tank due to where the interface was located

● Determine a method to check for mineral oil contamination in water

samples

22
References

[1] Wesley, Sabrina. “Basic Technology and Tools in Chemical Engineering Field.”
2012, www.overdrive.com/media/793707/libraries.

23
Questions?
Procedure - Mineral Oil Pump Calibration

● The mineral oil pump was first calibrated


○ Two marks were made at the bottom of the mineral oil column
○ The mineral oil pump was set to a specific flow rate on the flow
meter
○ The time that it took for the oil to fill from the first to second mark
was recorded
○ The volume of mineral oil that drained from the column was
recorded
25
Procedure - Trial Process

● Filled the column to the marked line with water using the water pump
○ The volume was 4052 mL
● Started the mineral oil pump and changed the flow rate to the desired
flow rate (this was t=0 min)
○ First trial used 390 mL/min, second used 220 mL/min
● As soon as the raffinate flowed into the tank, a sample was taken of the
mineral oil and
○ Volume of raffinate in ten seconds
○ Refractive index of mineral oil
26
Procedure - Sample Collection/Analysis

● Each sample was taken at 10 minutes after the first raffinate flowed
into the tank
● Water sample was taken right after the mineral oil sample was taken
● The refractive index of the the mineral oil and t-butanol mixture was
measured over time to determine purification amount

27

Potrebbero piacerti anche