Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Course Material of
Six Sigma Black-belt
- Measure Phase
TABLE OF CONTENT
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
3 Measure
3.1 Data Collection Plan- CTQ tree
3.2 Measurement Systems Analysis-
Concepts
3.3 Baselining
3.4 Process Capability Analysis
including Sigma Level Estimation
Overview of Measure Phase
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
3. Base-lining
• Type of Data
• Time Series Plot
• Histogram
• Frequency Plot
• Distributions- Normal, Binomial & Poisson
• Normality test
• Sampling
Overview of Measure Phase
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
CHAPTER – 3.1
Data Collection Plan
- CTQ Tree
DATA COLLECTION PLAN
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
CHAPTER – 3.2
Measurement System Analysis
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM PLANNING
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Variation in a process
(CTQ)
Accuracy Precision
COMPONENTS OF MSA
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Accuracy Precision
Bias
Observed
Average value
ACCURACY
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Variation in repeat
measurements
Repeatability Reproducibility
Inspector A B C
Batches 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
1 4.05 3.89 3.84 2.74 1.58 3.74 4.76 4.56 4.46
Gage name:
Date of study:
Gage R&R (Xbar/R) for Selectivity Reported by:
Tolerance:
Misc:
Average
1 2 3
3.0SL=5.557
5.5
1 3
Sample Mean
X=4.062 4.4 2
Average
4.5
3
3.5 3.5
X=4.062
3.9
3.9
2.5 -3.0SL=2.567 3.4
Part
2.5 -3.0SL=2.567 3.4
1 2 3
3 5
2 4
R Chart by Inspector 1
R=1.461
3 Response by Inspector
2
4 1 2 0
3 -3.0SL=0.00E+00
6
3.0SL=3.761 Operator 1 2 3
100 6
% Total Var
% Study Var 5
4
Percent
2 50 4
R=1.461 3
1 2 3
0
Gage R&R Repeat Reprod Part-to-Part Part 1 2 3
0 -3.0SL=0.00E+00 2
Inspector 1 2 3
4
50
3
2
0
Gage R&R Repeat Reprod Obj. to Obj. Obj. 1 2 3
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Part p-value Y N
Oper p-value Y N
Oper & Part p-value Y N
Pass?
CHAPTER – 3.3
Baselining
BASELINING
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
• Normally one will look for testing the data for normal
distribution of variable data.
Normality Test in Minitab
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Normality Test in Minitab
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Data Normal if
P>0.05
Normality Test in Minitab
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Distribution
is Normal
as P>0.05
Probability Distributions
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
• Reliability Function
– The Probability that the variable is greater than some value
– It is 1-CDF
Continuous Distribution: Normal
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Description
• The normal distribution (also called the Gaussian distribution) is the
most commonly used distribution in statistics. Two parameters (m (mu)
and s (sigma)) are required to specify the distribution.
The distribution
x m 2
x ; m 1
p ,s 2
e 2s 2
2 s 2
Notes
• The normal distribution closely matches the distribution of many
random processes, especially measuring processes
1.0
P(x < X)
0.5
0.0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
x
Cumulative
Distribution
Function (CDF)
1.0
P(x > X)
0.5
0.0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
x
Reliability
Function
Parameters of the Normal Distribution
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Both m and s are specific values for any given population, and they change as
the members of the population (the distribution) vary.
A Plot of the Normal Distribution
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
mean or average ( m or x )
LSL USL
lower specification limit upper specification limit
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Formal Definitions of Moments:
Statistical Expectation
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
The mean
• also called Expected Value or First Moment
• the Mean is a measure of central tendency, i.e., “Where is the center of
the distribution?” m E X
i1
x i f ( xi) for discrete variables
x f ( x ) d x fo r c o n tin u o u s v a ria b le s
Variance
• also called Second Moment
• Variance is a measure of spread in the distribution
2
m 2 s Var X E X m 2
xi m 2 f ( xi ) fo r d is c re te v a ria b le s
i 1
m x 2 f ( x ) d x fo r c o n tin u o u s v a ria b le s
Higher Order Moments
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
P o is s o n t t 1 1 3 t
t t
m s 2
n o rm a l 0 3
u n ifo r m
xU SL x L SL x U SL x L SL 2
0 1 .8
2
12
2
3 4
c h i- s q u a r e d 8
92 86 84 83 93 80 96 85 89 84
86 70 80 88 83 84 84 89 81 90
99 80 88 83 89 99 86 80 98 72
80 88 86 93 93 97 85 84 87 82
92 83 73 78 99 99 91 86 89 94
86 85 85 97 85 90 83 83 88 86
88 85 85 92 87 79 81 82 76 86
92 77 85 78 77 80 72 83 83 70
84 84 86 83 93 81 87 85 74 78
91 89 98 89 95 89 97 77 95 76
92 86 84 83 93 80 96 85 89 84
86 70 80 88 83 84 84 89 81 90
99 80 88 83 89 99 86 80 98 72
80 88 86 93 93 97 85 84 87 82
92 83 73 78 99 99 91 86 89 94
86 85 85 97 85 90 83 83 88 86
88 85 85 92 87 79 81 82 76 86
92 77 85 78 77 80 72 83 83 70
84 84 86 83 93 81 87 85 74 78
91 89 98 89 95 89 97 77 95 76
Variation /
Standard deviation
s
Mean or Average
m
Center / Location
Median - Middle Data Value when data is ranked from min. to max.
Range
- Differences between i i
Maximum & Minimum
2
Sx m
Standard Deviation -
n-1
MEAN & STANDARD DEVIATION
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
20 20
15
10
10
0
0
1 2 3 4 5
WHY STANDARD DEVIATION?
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
2
X X - Mean ( X - Mean)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sum
m
Mean
s
s
1s 1s
68.27%
2s 2s
95.45%
3s 3s
99.73%
Do you mean to say, whether you like it or not, 99.73%
of the observations will lie within Average +/- 3 s.d.?
PROCESS CAPABILITY
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Natural or inherent
3s variation experienced
in a process.
6s
3s Valid only when the
process is in a state
of statistical control
PROCESS CAPABILITY
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Process Capability
(6 s)
s = 6.8
6 s = 6 x 6.8
= 40.8
Mean = 85.8%
65.4 100.0
Standard Deviation = 6.8%
COMPARISON
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
VARIATION
LSL USL
ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE
VS
SPECIFICATIONS
Or
Customer
Requirements
COMPARISON
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Scenario: Specified
tolerance (T) exactly
equals to the process
capability, i.e. 6s
Tolerance (T)
LSL USL
64 ppm
Are you comfortable with the status quo? You still want
to further reduce the variability from s1 to s2?
REDUCE THE VARIATION
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
6 s2
Tolerance (T) 0.6 ppm
LSL USL
Oh, Yes!
You have got it !!!
T=12 s3
3 s3 3 s3
6 s3 0.002 ppm or
2 ppb
Tolerance (T)
LSL USL
Wait a bit! Every time you are assuming that average has always been
maintain at target. Is it practical?
What happens if the average shifts to a distance of 1.5 s3 from the
target to the worse side?
SIX SIGMA WITH SHIFT (SHORT TERM)
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Let us assume, average can go as away as 1.5 times s.d. from the
target.
T=12 s3
(with 1.5 s3 shift)
3.4 ppm
4.5 s3 1.5 s3 1.5 s3
6 s3
Tolerance (T)
LSL USL
SIX SIGMA LEVEL Vs. PPM
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
SIX SIGMA LEVEL Vs. PPM
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
SIX SIGMA LEVEL: DIFFERENT CASES
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
10
Best in Class
Domestic Airline
(3.4 ppm)
Flight Fatality Rate
1
2 3 4 5 6 (0.43 ppm)
7
SIGMA (with ±1.5 Sigma Shift)
IMPACT OF SIX SIGMA LEVEL
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Bulk of fruits
process
characterization 3s
Low hanging
fruits
7 basic tools
2s
Logic and intuition
Quick hits
Sampling is
Collecting a portion (sample) representatively of all
the data (population) and draw conclusion on the
population.
Frequency plot 50
(histogram)
Pareto chart 50
Scatter plot 24
Control chart 24
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
CHAPTER - 3.4
PROCESS CAPABILITY
TRADITIONAL METHOD
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Major Drawbacks
Variation
(deviation from target, set value or expectation)
STATISTICAL METHOD
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
6σ
Total Process Variation = 6σ
where σ : Standard Deviation
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
How to use PC
Variation Tolerance
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
How to use PC
6σ < T
Variation (6σ)
Tolerance (T)
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
How to use PC
6σ = T
Variation (6σ)
Tolerance (T)
PROCESS CAPABILITY INDICES
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Process Capability
=
Tolerance
or
PC = T
6σ or
Cp = 1
Tolerance (T) Cpk = 1
LSL USL
PC Vs T
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Process Capability
<
Tolerance
1σ 1σ
6σ < T or T = 8σ
6σ Cp = 1.33
Cpk = 1.33
Tolerance (T)
LSL USL
PC Vs T
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Process Capability
<
Tolerance
6σ < T or T = 8σ
Cp = 1.33
6σ Process off centered
Cpk < 1.33
Tolerance (T)
LSL USL
PC Vs T
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Total Process
Variation
<
Tolerance
2σ 2σ
6σ < T or T = 10σ
6σ
Cp = 1.67
Total Process
Variation
<
Tolerance
6σ < T or T = 10σ
6σ Cp = 1.67
Process off centered
Tolerance (T)
LSL USL
Cpk < 1
PC Vs T
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Total Process
Variation
<
Tolerance
3σ 3σ
6σ < T or T = 12σ
6σ
Cp = 2.00
Tolerance (T) Cpk = 2.00
LSL USL
PC Vs T
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Total Process
Variation
<
Tolerance
6σ < T or T = 12σ
6σ Cp = 2.00
Process off centered
Tolerance (T)
Cpk < 1.00
LSL USL
CTQ - SELECTIVITY
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
35
30
25
Frequency
20
15
10
0
0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65
PROCESS CAPABILITY - SHORT & LONG TERM
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
7
Yield = 1 –( 5 x 100 ) x 100
D
4. Calculate Defects Per Opportunity DPO = =
NxO
3.4ppm
3.4ppm
short-term
Short-term
distribution
distribution
-6s -3s 0 3s 6s
The “6” in the short-term “6 sigma” has the 1.5 shift built in;
subtract the 1.5 to get long-term capability:
6 – 1.5 = 4.5
NORMAL DATA, SINGLE SIDED
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
LB USL
Process Data
USL 24.0000
Within
Target *
Lower Bound 0.0000 Overall
Mean 23.9624
Sample N 50
StDev (Within) 1.91051
StDev (Overall) 2.00174
Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performance Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp * PPM < LB 0.00 PPM < LB * PPM < LB *
PPU 0.01 PPM > USL 500000.00 PPM > USL 492140.99 PPM > USL 492499.13
PPL * PPM Total 500000.00 PPM Total 492140.99 PPM Total 492499.13
Ppk 0.01
• PPM < LB
– EXPECTED PPM < LB is impossible (Minitab
prints the missing value, *)
– OBSERVED PPM < LB should be zero!
USL LSL
C pm
6 s 2 m T
2
Note:
If a spec is a
‘Boundary,’
Minitab will not
calculate Cpm!
ADD CPM TO OUR CAPABILITY OUTPUT
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
STEP 3.
Input the
target.
Target = 8.
Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performance Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp 2.00 PPM < LSL 0.00 PPM < LSL 0.00 PPM < LSL 0.00
PPU 0.01 PPM > USL 500000.00 PPM > USL 492140.99 PPM > USL 492499.13
PPL 3.99 PPM Total 500000.00 PPM Total 492140.99 PPM Total 492499.13
Ppk 0.01
HOW SHOULD WE IMPROVE THE PROCESS?
Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performance Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp 2.00 PPM < LSL 0.00 PPM < LSL 15.39 PPM < LSL 34.79
PPU 2.67 PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 0.00
PPL 1.33 PPM Total 0.00 PPM Total 15.39 PPM Total 34.79
Ppk 1.33
WHAT ABOUT NON-NORMAL DATA?
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
15
boundary .999
.99
.95
Probability
Frequency
10 .80
.50
.20
5 .05
.01
.001
0
0 5 10 15
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5 9.0 10.5 12.0 13.5 15.0
Improved Vis
Improved Viscosity Average: 3.52129 Anderson-Darling Normality Test
StDev: 2.99849 A-Squared: 1.610
N: 50 P-Value: 0.000
CAPABILITY STUDY
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
LB USL
Process Data
USL 24.0000
Within
Target *
Lower Bound 0.0000 Overall
Mean 3.5213
Sample N 50
StDev (Within) 2.60905
StDev (Overall) 3.01382
Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performance Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp * PPM < LB 0.00 PPM < LB * PPM < LB *
PPU 2.26 PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 0.00
PPL * PPM Total 0.00 PPM Total 0.00 PPM Total 0.00
Ppk 2.26
THE BOX-COX TRANSFORMATION
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
• We can use the Box-Cox Transformation to determine a transformation value
• When you use the Box-Cox Transformation, Minitab estimates a (lambda)
value
– Minitab presents the value which minimizes the s of a standardized transformed
variable
– The resulting transformation is Y when 0 and Log when = 0
• This method searches through many types of transformations
THE BOX-COX TRANSFORMATION
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
THE BOX-COX TRANSFORMATION
of 7
Est
Up
0.449
0.506
2.301
2.309
6
StDev
2
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Lambda
SO WHAT?
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Cpm *
Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performance Exp. "Overall" Performance
Pp * PPM < LB 0.00 PPM < LB* * PPM < LB* *
PPU 1.28 PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL* 46.06 PPM > USL* 59.93
PPL * PPM Total 0.00 PPM Total 46.06 PPM Total 59.93
Ppk 1.28
WHAT’S CHANGED?
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE Process Capability Analysis for Im
•Any item with anBox-Cox
asterisk Transformation,
next to it is for With Lamb
the transformed data
LB* Target*
Process
Process Capability Analysis for Improved
• Notice that histogram for the original data
Data Vis
USL 24.0000
USL* Box-Cox is shown
4.1660 as a referenceWith Lambda = 0.449
Transformation,
Target 8.0000
LB*
Target* • All capability indices are now
2.5438 for the
Target*
Process Data Lower Bound Transformed Data ONLY!
0.0000
USL 24.0000 Lower Bound* 0.0000
USL* 4.1660 Mean • 3.5213
Let’s compare the original data with the
Target 8.0000 Mean* 1.6043
Sample N transformed
50 data...
Target* 2.5438
StDev (Within) 2.60905
Lower Bound 0.0000
StDev* (Within) 0.65506
Lower Bound* 0.0000 StDev (Overall) 3.01382
Mean 3.5213 StDev* (Overall) 0.66598
Mean* 1.6043
Sample N 50 Potential (Within) Capability
Cp *
StDev (Within) 2.60905 CPU 1.30
StDev* (Within) 0.65506 CPL *
StDev (Overall) 3.01382 Cpk 1.30 0 1 2
StDev* (Overall) 0.66598
Cpm *
Potential (Within) Capability
Cp * Overall Capability Observed Performance Exp. "Within" Performanc
CPU 1.30 Pp * PPM < LB 0.00 PPM < LB*
PPU 1.28 PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL* 46
CPL *
PPL 0 * 1 PPM Total 2 0.00 PPM
3 Total 46
Cpk 1.30 Ppk 1.28
Cpm *
CAPABILITY SIX PACK
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
2
Mean=1.604
1
0
LCL=-0.3608
0 2 4
Obser. 0 10 20 30 40 50
Normal Prob Plot
2.4 UCL=2.414
Mov.Range
1.6
0.8 R=0.7389
0.0 LCL=0
0.0 1.5 3.0
2 Overall
Overall I I
1 StDev: 0.665976 Specifications
Pp: 1.04 I I I
0 Ppk: 0.80 0 T 24
30 40 50
Cpm: 0.60
Observation Number
STUDY COMPARISONS
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
______________________________________
______________________________________
BASELINE STATUS
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
No. of observations: 8
Normality test Normal
Average 151.4
s.d. 24.4
Adequacy of sample size with 17.3
precision level:
Cp
Cpk -1.25
dpmo 500000
Sigma level- short term: 1.5
Sigma level- long term: 0
Baseline: I
378
340
154
342
263
EXERCISE-10: BASELINE STATUS
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE
Record ref.
Responsibility
Measurement Accuracy:
Support System
Instrument:
Make
L.C.
Calibration
Bias
Precision:
%R&R
Sigma R&R
EXERCISE-10: BASELINE STATUS
SQC& OR UNIT, PUNE