Sei sulla pagina 1di 45

Chapter 8

Stock Index Futures

• Organization of Slides:
– History
– Futures Contract Specifications
– Risk Management
– Index Calculations (Appear in the Extra Section).

©David Dubofsky and 8-1


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Stock Index Futures, History I.
• Trading began on February 24, 1982, when the Kansas City
Board of Trade introduced futures on the Value Line Index.

• About two months later, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange


introduced futures contracts on the S&P 500 index.

• By 1986, the S&P 500 futures contract had become the second
most actively traded futures contract in the world, with over 19.5
million contracts traded in that year.

• In May 1982, the NYSE Composite Index futures contract began


trading on the New York Futures Exchange, the NYFE.

©David Dubofsky and 8-2


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Stock Index Futures, History II.

• In July 1984, the Chicago Board of Trade began trading futures


contracts on the Major Market Index (MMI).
– Dow Jones and Company went to court to block its attempts
to trade futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)

• But, in June 1997, Dow Jones and Company agreed to allow


DJIA options, futures, and options on futures to begin trading.

• On October 6, 1997, futures on the DJIA began trading on the


Chicago Board of Trade.

©David Dubofsky and 8-3


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
In their short trading history, stock index
futures contracts have had a great impact.
• Trading in stock index futures has allegedly made the world's
stock markets more volatile than ever before.

• Critics claim that individual investors have been driven out of the
equity markets because institutional traders' actions in both the
spot and futures markets cause stock values to gyrate with no
links to their fundamental values.

• Many political figures have called for greater regulation, going


so far as to favor an outright ban on stock index futures trading.

• Fortunately, such extreme measures have been avoided.

©David Dubofsky and 8-4


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Stock index futures have become
irreplaceable in the modern world of
institutional money management.

• Stock Index futures have revolutionized the art and


science of equity portfolio management as practiced by:

– mutual funds
– pension plans
– endowments
– insurance company
– other money managers.

©David Dubofsky and 8-5


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
2 Important Details

• A futures contract on a stock market index represents


the right and obligation to buy or to sell a portfolio of
stocks characterized by the index.

• Stock index futures are cash settled.


– That is, there is no delivery of the underlying stocks.
– The contracts are marked to market daily.
– On the last trading day, the futures price is set equal to the
spot index level and there is a final mark to market cash flow.

©David Dubofsky and 8-6


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
What is an Index?
• An index is, in one sense, just a number that is computed in
order to measure the value of a portfolio of stocks.
– Other indices have been constructed to track the values of other
types of securities, such as bonds and futures.
– Still other indices track such economic indicators as the consumer
price index (CPI) or the index of leading indicators.

• When constructing a stock market index, three issues are of


particular interest:
– which stocks are in the index
– how each stock is weighted
– how the average is computed

• We will describe three different stock market indices.

©David Dubofsky and 8-7


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
A Famous Price-Weighted Index: The
Dow Jones Industrial Average

• When one asks: "How is the market doing?", it is


usually implicit that the question is refers to the DJIA.

• Other stock market indices that are computed in the


same way as the DJIA, and which have futures and
options trading on them include the Nikkei 225 stock
index of Japanese stocks.

©David Dubofsky and 8-8


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
As of December 2001, the 30
stocks in the DJIA were:
Alcoa Honeywell
American Express IBM
AT&T Intel
Boeing International Paper
Caterpillar Johnson & Johnson
Citigroup McDonalds
Coca Cola Merck
Disney Microsoft
DuPont 3-M
Eastman Kodak J.P. Morgan Chase
Exxon Mobil Philip Morris
General Electric Procter & Gamble
General Motors SBC Communications
Hewlett Packard United Technologies
Home Depot Wal-Mart

©David Dubofsky and 8-9


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Dow Jones Futures

• Futures on the DJIA trade on the Chicago Board of Trade.

• The value of stock underlying one DJIA futures contract equals


$10 times the futures price.

• One tick is one Dow-point, and this equals $10.

• Thus, if the DJIA futures price rises one tick, i.e., from 10813 to
10814, a trader who is long one contract profits by $10 because
the value of the stock underlying the contract rises from
$108,130 to $108,140.

©David Dubofsky and 8-10


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
A Famous Value-Weighted Average:
The S&P 500 Stock Index

• A widely quoted benchmark portfolio.

• Vanguard S&P 500 Trust.

• SPDR. (http://www.amex.com).

• Standard and Poor’s (S&P) webpage:


http://www.standardandpoors.com.

©David Dubofsky and 8-11


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Many Futures Trade on
Value-Weighted Indices

• Trading on the CME alone:


– The S&P 500 futures (the future’s face value is $250 times
the S&P 500 index level)
– Mini-S&P 500 futures (the future’s face value is only $50
times the S&P 500 index level)
– The S&P Midcap 400 (400 middle-sized firms)
– Nasdaq 100 (100 Largest Nasdaq Stocks)
– Russell 2000 (small cap stocks)

©David Dubofsky and 8-12


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
S&P 500 stock index
futures contracts

• Perhaps the most actively traded stock index futures


in the world.
• The last trading day for this contract is the Thursday
before the third Friday of the delivery month.
• Therefore, there are four delivery months:
– March
– June
– September
– December

©David Dubofsky and 8-13


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Marking to Market
• The smallest allowed price change (the “tick”) is 0.10 point,
which equals $25.

• Thus, if the S&P 500 futures price falls from 1,019.40 to


1,019.30, the face value of the futures contract declines $25.
That is:
(1,019.40)(250) = $254,850
(1,019.30)(250) = $254,825

• This one tick decrease in the futures price creates a mark to


market profit of $25 for an individual who is short one contract.

©David Dubofsky and 8-14


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Portfolio Risk Management
Using Stock Index Futures

• Portfolio managers often have reasons for


selling parts of their portfolio. For example:
a) They may feel some stocks no longer offer adequate
returns for the risks the stocks possess;
b) They may have turned bearish (or less bullish) on the
overall market, or;
c) They may have to sell in order to provide cash for their
clients.

Stock index futures provide an efficient means to


achieve their objectives for reasons b) and c) above.
©David Dubofsky and 8-15
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Stock index futures are also surrogates for the
stock purchases when the portfolio manager:

a) has received an inflow of cash but has not decided which


stocks or market sectors in which to invest.

b) has a growing bullishness about the market.

c) wants to get market exposure in advance of a near-term


expected cash inflow.

d) wants an investment that can be quickly liquidated to raise


cash, if needed.

©David Dubofsky and 8-16


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Changing the Beta of a Portfolio
• Capital Market Theory predicts that rational investors will only
hold combinations of two assets:
– The market portfolio of all assets, (by definition, has a beta of 1.0)
– A risk-less asset, (by definition, has a beta of 0.0)

• If investors are relatively more risk averse or are bearish


about the prospects for the stock market, investors will lower
the beta of their portfolio by shifting a portion of their assets into
risk-less securities.

• If investors are not very risk averse or if they are bullish about
the market, investors will raise their portfolio's beta by
borrowing additional capital and investing the borrowed funds in
risky securities.

©David Dubofsky and 8-17


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Example: Adjusting the Beta of a
Portfolio with Stock Index Futures

• Portfolio managers adjust their portfolio betas as they perceive


risk and return changes.

• When they are bullish, i.e., they believe that the stock market
offers a relatively high expected return for a given level of risk,
they will increase the beta of their stock portfolio.

• When they are bearish, (or simply believe that the risk of the
market has increased), they will decrease their portfolio's beta.

©David Dubofsky and 8-18


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Equation to Adjust Beta:
• A negative number indicates that futures should be sold in order
to lower the portfolio beta. A positive number means that futures
should be bought.

N=
 βD - βP 
×
Portfolio Value
βF (Futures Price) × Multiplier

• Note: Generally, bF = 1, and the Futures Multiplier for the S&P500


is 250.

©David Dubofsky and 8-19


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Using the Equation, I.

• A portfolio manager is concerned that the stock market will


temporarily decline in the next few days.

• The manager does not wish to incur the commission costs and
price pressure of selling stocks and then repurchasing them
after the anticipated decline.

• Thus, the manager decides to use futures contracts to hedge


against the expected market decline.

©David Dubofsky and 8-20


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Using the Equation, II.
• An equity fund manager owns a portfolio of $20 million in stocks with a
portfolio beta of 1.20.
• Suppose, the S&P 500 index level is 1275 and the observed futures
price is 1280. What is the risk-minimizing position?

N=
 0.0 - 1.20  ×
$20,000,000
= -75.
1 (1280) × 250

• The Key: Set the target portfolio beta, d, equal to 0.0. Then, using the
equation above, we conclude that the manager should sell 75 futures
contracts.
• Suppose the manager was right about the market's movement, and
the S&P 500 declines to 1224, which is a 4% decline in the market.

©David Dubofsky and 8-21


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Using the Equation, III.
• If beta was estimated accurately, the value of the manager’s
equity portfolio should decline by 4.8% (1.20 times 4%). This
results in a loss in the capital value of the portfolio of $960,000.

• Now assume that the futures price also declines by 4%, to


1228.80.

• A futures price decline of 51.2 points results in a profit of


$12,800 on one futures contract. On a position of 75 short
futures contracts, the profit would be $960,000.

• Here, the hedge eliminated the effects of the market decline.

©David Dubofsky and 8-22


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Stock Index Arbitrage

• Stock Index Arbitrage is an attempt to exploit any futures


mispricing relative to the index level.

• When futures prices lie outside their no-arbitrage bounds,


arbitrageurs will quickly act to realize the (near) riskless profits
by buying cheap stock and selling futures (buy programs), or
buying cheap futures and selling stock (sell programs).

• Between July 1, 2002 and August 30, 2002, program trading


averaged 34.6% of total NYSE volume, and stock index
arbitrage as a percentage of total program trading ranged
between 8.4% and 14.3%, with an average of 11.9%.
©David Dubofsky and 8-23
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Arbitrage Bounds
• In practice, if F > S + CC - CR, then arbitrageurs' purchases of
stock increase stock prices (these are called “buy programs”).

• Their sales of futures will depress futures prices, until


equilibrium is again reached (F  S + CC - CR), and no
arbitrage opportunities exist.

• Similarly, if F < S + CC - CR, the buying of cheap futures and


the sale of expensive stock (“sell programs”).

• Their purchases of futures will increase futures prices, until


equilibrium is again reached (F  S + CC - CR), and no
arbitrage opportunities exist.
©David Dubofsky and 8-24
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Program Trading
• Program trading is a technique for trading a stock portfolio in one single
order.

• The NYSE defines a program trade as: "a wide range of portfolio trading
strategies involving the purchase or sale of a basket of 15 stocks or more,
and valued at more than $1 million".

• Program trading may involve stock index arbitrage, option replication


strategies, or asset allocation shifts (such as between equities and
bonds), etc.

• Recent growth in program trading has arisen from brokers who offer
institutions the ability to trade large portfolios of stocks with low cost and
little price impact.

• In 2001, program trading accounted for almost 30% of total NYSE volume.
©David Dubofsky and 8-25
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
An Actual Pricing Example, 2/5/99
• SPH: 1,243.50
• S&P Index: 1,239.40
• T-bill rate: 4.35%
• Days to Expiration: 42
• Annual Dividend Yield: 1.32% (assume this is the
dividend yield in terms of its future value)

What is the theoretical futures price, and the Deviation


from Fair Value (DFV)?

©David Dubofsky and 8-26


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
DFV = Factual – Ftheoretical

• Let t = the time until delivery, in years.


• Note that dividends = dtS
• Ftheoretical = S + Srt – Sdt
• Ftheoretical = 1239.40 + (1239.40)(0.0435)(42/365) -
(1239.40)(0.0132)(42/365) = 1243.72
• Fobs is ‘too low’ by –0.22 index points.
• So, if TC are less than 0.22 to perform reverse cash
and carry arbitrage, then do it!

©David Dubofsky and 8-27


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Index Arbitrage with Transaction Costs
• Let hb and hl = the unannualized borrowing rate and
lending rate, respectively.

• Let Sbid and Sask = the spot index value, based on


stocks’ bid quotes and asked quotes, respectively.

• Let TC1 and TC2 = transaction costs (commissions,


etc.) necessary to perform reverse cash and carry
arbitrage, and cash and carry arbitrage, respectively.

• Sbid (1+hl(0,T)) - div(1+hb(,T)) - TC1 < F <


Sask(1+hb(0,T)) - div(1+hl(,T)) + TC2
©David Dubofsky and 8-28
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
The DOT

• In 1976, the New York Stock Exchange introduced its Designated


Order Turnaround (DOT) system, which was improved and
renamed Super DOT in November 1984.

• Super DOT is a computerized order handling system that


guarantees that any market order of less than 2100 shares of a
stock will be executed within three minutes at the prevailing bid
price (for a market sell order) or asked price (for a market buy
order) at the time the order was entered, or at better prices if
possible.

• Today, the average order through SuperDot is transmitted,


executed and reported back to the originating firm in 22 seconds.

©David Dubofsky and 8-29


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
DOT and Stock Index Arbitrage

• Originally, DOT was designed to alleviate the traffic around


specialists' trading posts by automatically handling the orders of
small individual investors.

• Runners do not have to hand-carry small orders to the


specialist. Instead, they are electronically transmitted from order
rooms to the specialists' posts.

• Little did the designers of DOT realize that their system would
be adopted by index arbitrageurs, who now enter orders to buy
or sell portfolios of stocks, including the composition of any
index replicating portfolio (e.g., 1000 shares of IBM, 1267
shares of GM, etc.).

©David Dubofsky and 8-30


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Computerized Trading

• Whenever an arbitrage opportunity arises a trader can literally


push a button to submit these orders to buy (at the asked) or
sell (at the bid) the entire basket of stocks.

• On average, the execution of the trade is reported back to the


buyer or seller in 22 seconds.

• At the same time, the arbitrageur will trade the necessary stock
index futures contracts.

• Larger orders (more than 2099 shares of one stock) are


handled less efficiently, with trades occurring only after an
arbitrageur's human representative carries the order to the
specialists' posts.
©David Dubofsky and 8-31
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Risks of Stock Index Arbitrage
• Even with Super DOT, there are some risks to index arbitrage.
Large orders to trade securities are not guaranteed any price,
and prices can change quickly in the few minutes that it takes to
execute all of the desired trades.

• Arbitrageurs' orders to buy stock may create upward price


pressure on those stocks unless there happens to be a
contemporaneous flow of sell orders, or the specialist is willing
to reduce his inventory of stock.

• Similarly, program selling will often lead to price declines in the


spot stock market.

©David Dubofsky and 8-32


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Some Extra Slides on this Material
• Note: In some chapters, we try to include some extra slides in
an effort to allow for a deeper (or different) treatment of the
material in the chapter.

• If you have created some slides that you would like to share
with the community of educators that use our book, please send
them to us!

©David Dubofsky and 8-33


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Three Basic Weighting Schemes

• Capitalization-Weighting (AKA Value Weighting or


Market-Value Weighting):

– Stocks held in proportion to their market value.

– Large-cap companies have more influence on the index.

©David Dubofsky and 8-34


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Three Basic Weighting Schemes, Cont.

• Price Weighting: Equal number of shares invested in


each stock, therefore, the price is the weight.
– The highest-priced stocks have the largest weight.
– Berkshire Hathaway

• Equal Dollar Weighting: Same dollar investment in


each stock.
– The lowest-priced stocks have more influence.

©David Dubofsky and 8-35


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Assume a $1,000,000 Portfolio,
Value-Weighting, Data from 3/11/1994
Shares Capitalization Value Value
Company Price (millions) (millions) Weight Shares

Am. Express 28.625 485.445 13,895.9 0.0560 1,956

GE 105.250 852.935 89,771.4 0.3618 3,437

3M 103.250 215.791 22,280.4 0.0898 870

Merck 32.125 1,282.316 41,194.4 0.1660 5,167

Exxon 65.250 1,241.618 81,015.6 0.3265 5,003

Total: 334.500 Total: 248,157.7 1.0000 16,434

Note: Shares = $1,000,000*Weight / Price

©David Dubofsky and 8-36


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Assume a $1,000,000 Portfolio,
Price-Weighting, Data from 3/11/1994
Price Price-Weighted
Company Price Weight Shares

Am. Express 28.625 0.086 2,990

GE 105.250 0.315 2,990

3M 103.250 0.309 2,990

Merck 32.125 0.096 2,990

Exxon 65.250 0.195 2,990

334.500 1.000 2,990

Note: Shares = $1,000,000 / 334.500 = 2,990

©David Dubofsky and 8-37


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
DJIA Index Details, I.
• The DJIA is computed by adding the prices of the thirty
component stocks, and dividing the sum by a divisor.

• The divisor is printed in the Wall Street Journal every day and is
also available in the equity product information area at
http://www.cbot.com.

• For example, on April 24, 2001, the divisor for the DJIA was
0.15369402. On September 9, 1999, the divisor was
0.19740463.

• The divisor is changed when one of two events occurs.


Periodically, one of the thirty stocks in the DJIA may be
removed, and another company's stock is substituted.

• This will happen when a component stock is taken over by


another company or one of the corporations goes bankrupt.
©David Dubofsky and 8-38
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
DJIA Index Details, II.
• For example, Anaconda, a component of the DJIA, was bought
by Atlantic Richfield (ARCO) in 1976. Thus, a new component
stock (which was MMM) was chosen to replace Anaconda.

• Dow Jones may decide that the DJIA no longer representative


of "the market", so the composition will change.
– This occurred on November 1, 1999
– IN: Home Depot, Intel, Microsoft, and SBC Communications
– OUT: Chevron, Goodyear, Sears Roebuck, and Union Carbide.

• So, anytime there is a change in the portfolio of the constituent


stocks, or if there are splits, stock dividends, or mergers, the
DJIA divisor will change because Dow Jones and Company
wants to remove the impact on the index from these events.

• NB: The DJIA is not adjusted to account for regular dividend


payments. ©David Dubofsky and 8-39
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Example: Changing the Divisor
Day 1 of Index: Company Price
Am. Express 28.625
GE 105.250
3M 103.250
Merck 32.125
Exxon 65.250
Sum: 334.500

Index: 66.90 (Divisor = 5)

Before Day 2 starts, we want to replace Merck with Intel, selling at $22.

To Keep the value of the Index the same, i.e., 66.90:

Am. Express 28.625


GE 105.250
3M 103.250
Intel 22.000
Exxon 65.250
Sum: 324.375

Sum / Divisor = 66.90 if Divisor is: 4.848654709

©David Dubofsky and 8-40


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
DJIA Index Details, III.

• To construct a portfolio that is equivalent to the DJIA, an


investor must buy an equal number of shares of each of the
component stocks.

• Maintaining the proper underlying portfolio is complicated by the


payment of cash dividends and stock distributions.

• Still, the DJIA is an easy index to replicate, as it has only 30


stocks, each of which is very actively traded.

• If a stock selling for $100/share increases in value by 5%, then


the DJIA will increase by 5/divisor points.

• If a stock selling for $20/share rises in price by 5%, then the


DJIA will rise by only 1/divisor points.
©David Dubofsky and 8-41
Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Assume a $1,000,000 Portfolio,
Equal-Weighting, Data from 3/11/1994
Equal Equal-Weighted
Company Price Weight Shares

Am. Express 28.625 0.200 6,987

GE 105.250 0.200 1,900

3M 103.250 0.200 1,937

Merck 32.125 0.200 6,226

Exxon 65.250 0.200 3,065

1.000 20,115

Shares = $1,000,000*0.20 / Price

©David Dubofsky and 8-42


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Many stock market indices are Value-
Weighted Averages
• In the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), a stock's correlation
with the market portfolio is the factor that determines its price,
and that market portfolio is value-weighted.

• Besides the NYSE and S&P Indices, other value-weighted


indices include the AMEX Market Value Index, the NASDAQ
Composite Index, the Russell 2000 Index, and the Wilshire
5000.

• The levels of these and yet other indices are presented daily in
the Wall Street Journal. While each index is a different portfolio
of stocks, the method of computing each index is the same.

©David Dubofsky and 8-43


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Value-Weighted Index Movements.
Total Shares Market Capitalization
Day 1: Company Price (millions) (millions)
Am. Express 28.625 485.445 13,896
GE 105.250 852.935 89,771
3M 103.250 215.791 22,280
Merck 32.125 1,282.316 41,194
Exxon 65.250 1,241.618 81,016
Total MV(1): 248,158

Divisor (Set by Vendor): 248.1576686

Day 1 Index Level: 1000.00

Total Shares Market Capitalization


Day 2: Company Price (millions) (millions)
Am. Express 29.000 485.445 14,078
GE 110.000 852.935 93,823
3M 92.000 215.791 19,853
Merck 37.000 1,282.316 47,446
Exxon 67.000 1,241.618 83,188
Total MV(2): 258,388

Day 2 Index Level: 1041.22

©David Dubofsky and 8-44


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.
Note Bene: The Day 3 index can be
calculated in two ways:
Total Shares Market Capitalization
Day 3: Company Price (millions) (millions)
Am. Express 25.000 485.445 12,136.1
GE 108.500 852.935 92,543.4
3M 93.700 215.791 20,219.6
Merck 37.875 1,282.316 48,567.7
Exxon 62.000 1,241.618 76,980.3

Total MV(3): 250,447.2

Day 3 Index Level: 1009.23

Market Value Day 2


Day 2 Index   Index Level Day 1
Market Value Day 1

Market Value Day 2


Day 2 Index   Index Level Day 0
Market Value Day 0

©David Dubofsky and 8-45


Thomas W. Miller, Jr.

Potrebbero piacerti anche