Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SUBJECT - LANDSCAPE
Manaus, Brazil
-single tree
-group of trees
-woodland areas
VARIOUS ASPECTS OF URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT.
TREE SELECTION
Municipalities should strive for diversity of tree species throughout
their city-An accepted rule recommends no more than 30 % from a
single plant family, less than 20 % of the trees should be from the
same genus and no more than, 10 %from the same species.
REPLACEMENT COSTS
• This method is used when the plants are of a size that can be
replaced.
– The Replacement Cost Method can be used to appraise the
value of transplantable landscape trees, shrubs, and vines.
– The Appraised Valueof a landscape plant is based on the cost
of planting a plant of the same or comparablespecies, conditions,
and size in the same place.If the appraised plant is to be replaced,
the costsof plant removal and cleanup are addedto obtain the
Appraised Value.
VARIOUS ASPECTS OF URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT.
TREE INVENTORIES
• Partial
– Downtown trees
– Park trees
collection
• Complete
– 100% inventory of all public trees
– GIS/GPS option
VARIOUS ASPECTS OF URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT.
COST IMPLEMENTATION
- Pruning
- Irrigation
- Sidewalk repair
– Sustainable sites
– Water efficiencies
– Innovation in design
– Regional priority
VARIOUS ASPECTS OF URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT.
TRUNK FORMULA METHOD
TA(R)] x Species)
• Condition = A rating of the tree's structure and health and based on 100 percent
• Location = the average for the tree's Site, Contribution and Placement and based on 100 percent
• Replacement Cost = the cost to purchase and install the largest locally available and transportable tree in the area.
• Basic Price = the cost per square inch of trunk area of a replacement tree measured at the height prescribed.
• TA(A) = Trunk Area at 4.5 feet above the ground of the appraised tree
• TA(R) = Trunk Area at 6 inches or 12 inches above the ground of the replacement tree
• Species = the rating for a particular species and based on 100 percent
BENEFITS AND USES OF URBAN FORESTS AND TREES
Introduction
Only in the late 19th century and in the first half of the 20th
living conditions of the urban working class improved. A sports
and outdoor movement emerged that used urban green space
for recreation.
The key factor for active use is easy access to the areas,
preferably within walking distance from home.
SOCIAL POTENTIAL AND TRENDS IN URBAN FOREST AND TREE
Nowadays, different sections of urban society tend to share
more collective values regarding sound management of the
environment, including the importance of green space for the
well-being of growing urbanized societies.
Single trees filter less dust than groups or rows of trees. Trees
capture air pollutants most efficiently when they are planted
close to the source of emissions.
URBAN CLIMATES
urban woodland and trees are consistently among the coolest
surfaces during hot summer days.
American Forests took on this project to help people (and city leaders)
better understand the critical value of urban forests in their cities to their
own lives, health, economies and well-being of their communities. And
to, therefore, invest in their urban forests. We see proactive individuals
as a key to maintaining urban forests. These people recognize that trees
around them are not just pretty shade providers, but are essential
elements of the natural fabric of the planet that we depend upon for
survival.
The 10 best cities that we are recognizing today have made prolonged A view of central Minneapolis,
and profound investments in the health of their urban forest, and they’ve one of American Forests
benefited from active nonprofit and community participation in improving from across the Mississippi River at
St. Anthony Falls
and maintaining the city’s environmental resources. We extol these
cities’ efforts and dedication to urban forests to elevate the quality of life
for citizens and visitors alike and hope that other cities will be inspired by
their success.
WASHINGTON, DC
The District of Colombia has a long history of planning, enhancing and
maintaining its urban forest. Beginning in 1872, Governor Alexander
Shepherd ordered that 60,000 street trees be planted systematically to
“improve the quality of life in the Nation’s capital.” Because of his
actions, DC’s unofficial title became The City of Trees.
Since then, there has been a municipal agency responsible for tree
maintenance across the city. As of today, DC’s urban tree canopy hovers
near 35 percent, with nearly 2 million trees across the city. These trees
remove 540 tons of pollution per year, store 526,000 tons of carbon and
reduce the cost of energy usage in buildings by $2.6 million per year
resulting in an estimated $96,000 in avoided carbon emissions.
TOKYO, JAPAN
After the city was bombed during World War II, the number of trees
on Tokyo’s streets fell from 105,000 to 42,000—nearly 60 percent. In
the years following, the city lost another 35,000 due to disease and as
many were cut for firewood. Fire from the bombings destroyed much of
Tokyo’s forest cover in addition to decimating street trees, creating large
empty parcels of land as well.
In 1946, the city created a plan to secure 10 percent of urban lands for
green areas and turn the barren parcels of land into urban parks.
Beginning in 1948, the city started restoring street trees as well when
new supplies of trees became available from nurseries. By 1980, the
number of street trees exceeded 235,000.
https://www.wri.org/blog/2016/03/3-cities-taking-urban-forestry-next-level
http://www.uniindia.com/india-s-first-urban-forest-to-be-created-in-kolkata/states/news/1186378.html
http://www.rojdin.in/urban-forest-rajarhat/mounthill_the_rain_forest-rajarhat-kolkata-mounthill_realty/
THANK YOU