Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
materials:-
• Inviting quotations from vendors,
comparative statement. Collecting samples
of materials and testing. Vendor selection
criteria. Concept of method control
statement involving use of materials.
• Acceptance criteria and tolerances.
•Need for
Tender/Quotation
Classification of Procurement
1. Procurement of Goods
and Materials
2. Procurement of Services
3. Procurement for Works
Methods of Procurement
1. Direct Purchase i.e. without
quotation/tender
2. Procurement by inviting quotation
* Delivery-
Terms * ST/Octrol
* Time required for supply
* Payment terms etc.
I recommend that the Indent/s may be placed on the Firm/s on which the choice has/have been indicated above in
the statement. The reasons for
selection at a higher rate has been indicated in the appropriate column.
Prepared by:
Professor
Department
For Use in Unit IV-A For use of Internal Auditor The indents may be prepared/processed as per
Prechecked choice indicated
Observation/Checked &
Returned
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT
(QUOTATION ANALYSIS STATEMENT)
• a. If the quotations/responses received against
our enquiries/tenders, do not meet basic and
essential requirements they will be summarily
rejected.
• b. All the tenders are to be evaluated strictly on
the basis of the terms and conditions
incorporated in the tender enquiry document and
terms and conditions etc. stipulated by the
tenderers in their tenders.
• c. No new condition should be brought in while
evaluating the tenders.
•
• Details such as validity of the offer, delivery schedule,
submission of EMD, SD, etc. are indicated in the
Comparative statement.
• If the offers have been received containing different
currencies (in the case of imported goods), the entire
quoted price are to be converted into the Indian
currency for evaluation and comparison of offers on
equitable basis, on the tender opening day.
• If this day happens to be a bank holiday, the next
working day will be considered.
• IMPORTANT POINTS CONSIDERED WHILE PREPARING
COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS
• Following points are considered while preparing the
comparative statement as there will have an effect on
the decision making.
• a. Conditional discount offered by the bidders should
not be taken into consideration for comparison.
• b. In cases where the bidders have mentioned about
excise duty: If exempted against our certificate – nil. If
not exempted or for any such reasons – payment of
actual duty to be considered.
• c. details of validity period, delivery period, warranty
period, payment terms, VAT, Octroi etc. as quoted by
the bidders.
EVALUATION OF QUOTATIONS
• 1) Once the Comparative statement is complete as
above, the folder will be sent to indenter for
technical evaluation and further
recommendations.
• 2) Evaluation of tenders shall be done on an
equitable basis and in a fair and transparent
manner considering all aspects in Comparative
statements.
• 3) Justification for rejecting the offer with lower
rates to be provided if order is not recommended.
• 4) Even in cases where the technical/price
comparative statement of offers is prepared by
the user, purchase staff shall check the details and
ensure that the comparative statement is correctly
prepared in all respects before sending the file to
the competent authority/committee for
approval/preparing the order.
Vendor/Supplier selection criteria
Quality, Cost, and Delivery (QCD)
Quality, Cost, and Delivery (QCD)
• The most important criteria in construction
industry is material quality, delivery dependability,
and cost. The most important factor of supplier
selection should be the quality level of the
procurement items.
• Unit price should not be the only criteria in supplier
evaluation.
• Total cost of ownership is an important factor. Total
cost of ownership includes the unit price of the
material, payment terms, cash discount, ordering
and carrying cost, logistics and maintenance costs,
and other more qualitative costs that may not be
easy to assess.
Long-Term Relationship