Sei sulla pagina 1di 11

Decision Modelling Project

Faculty Assignment In A College


GROUP 11

ABHIJIT MBA19164 RAKESH MBA19221 SOWJANYA MBA19245 SUKRUTH MBA19268


AJAY MBA19170 VAISHNAVI MBA19241 RISHABH MBA19270
Assignment Model
 The assignment method is any technique used
to assign organizational resources to activities.
 We represent each agent as an origin node and each task as a
destination node.
 The best assignment method will maximize profits and minimize
costs.
 An assignment method can be used in the following situations of
assigning jobs to machines, agents to tasks, sales personnel to
sales territories, contracts to bidders, etc.
Case Summary

The mathematics department of a college in


Chennai will be scheduling faculty to teach
courses during the following academic year. 8
courses needed to be covered by 6 faculties.

Based on the evaluation of students from the


previous term the courses are to be assigned
to each faculty such that no courses are left
out.

Some professors have their own preference


Special Constraints

• Prof. Bhaskar can handle 2 courses at the


same time, whereas the others can handle
only 1.
• Prof. Charles cannot be assigned to
Combinatorics if Prof. Bharati is assigned with
Real Analysis.
• If Prof. Xavier is assigned with Real Analysis
then Prof. Bhaskar cannot be assigned to
Linear Algebra.
• Prof. Chris Monica can be assigned to
combinatorics if and only if Prof. Isido is
assigned to Linear Algebra
• C programming must be assigned to either of
Prof. Bharati or Prof. Monica or Prof. Kins
Student Ratings

Course
Vector Linear C
Professor Real Analysis Algebra Algebra Programming Combinatorics Dynamics
Dr. Bharathi 3.8 3.2 4.3 3.8 4.4 3.5
Dr. M. A. Baskar 4.2 4 4.6 4 4.7 3.9
Dr. Antony Xavier 4.3 4.2 4.5 4.6 4.9 3.2
Dr. Florence Isido 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.5 4.3 4.2
Dr. Arockiya Raj 3.5 4.2 3.6 3.8 3.2 4.2
Dr. Chris Monica 2.8 3.5 4.4 4.3 3 4.3
Dr. Charles 4.3 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.2 3.8
Dr. Kins 3.9 3.7 4.5 3.2 4.4 4.1
Objective function & Constraints
Linear Programming Formulation of this problem is developed as follows:

Let the professors be named 1, 2, .. 8 respectively and the courses be named as A, B, .… F.

Objective Function:
Maximize 3.8A1 + 4.2A2 + 4.3A3 + ….4.3C1 + 4.6C2 + …………… + 3.8F5 + 4.1F6

Constraints:

A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 + A5 + A6 + A7 + A8 = 1 A1 + B1 + C1 + D1 + E1 + F1 <= 1
B1 + B2 + B3 + B4 + B5 + B6 + B7 + B8 = 1 A2 + B2 + C2 + D2 + E2 + F2 <= 2
C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 + C5 + C6 + C7 + C8 = 1 A3 + B3 + C3 + D3 + E3 + F3 <= 1
D1 + D2 + D3 + D4 + D5 + D6 + D7 + D8 = 1 A4 + B4 + C4 + D4 + E4 + F4 <= 1
E1 + E2 + E3 + E4 + E5 + E6 + E7 + E8 = 1 A5 + B5 + C5 + D5 + E5 + F5 <= 1
F1 + F2 + F3 + F4 + F5 + F6 + F7 + F8 = 1 A6 + B6 + C6 + D6 + E6 + F6 <= 1
A1 + E7 <= 1 C2 + A3 <= 1 A7 + B7 + C7 + D7 + E7 + F7 <= 1
C2 + E6 <= 2 D1 + D6 + D8 = 1 A8 + B8 + C8 + D8 + E8 + F8 <= 1
Network Model

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

A B C D E F
Solver Solution
Optimal Solution Rating

Real Analysis to Dr. Charles 4.3


Vector Algebra to Dr. Arockiya Raj 4.2
Linear Algebra to Dr. M. A. Bhaskar 4.6
C Programming to Dr. Chris Monica 4.3
Combinatorics to Dr. Antony Xavier 4.9
Dynamics to Dr. Florence Isido 4.2

Total Rating 26.5


Conclusion

 Thus by using the assignment model the professors are assigned to the courses
that they are rated to be best by the students.
 With this model, the wastage of time in allotting the professors manually can be
reduced.
 At the same time, with the best faculty for each course, there would be an
increase in the overall efficiency of students.
Thank you

Potrebbero piacerti anche