Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
BASED APPROACH
3. Provide a floor, not a ceiling, of basic standards, below which the state
must not fall and which it must protect or fulfil
4. KEY PRINCIPLES:
– Fairness
– Respect
– Equality
– Dignity
» In a democratic society
Overview
• Human rights protection necessary for stability
• Victorian Charter of Human Rights and
Responsibilities includes other rights than those
named in the Charter e.g. UNCRC
• You can’t ‘sue’ for a breach, but
• There are many ways to Rights
Resp parliam
onsi ent
make them work in Victoria biliti
es
liabilit Statutes
Local
y
laws
old
When? ways How?
of
doing
things
Case Study 1 – Darlene’s little
problem
What are the human rights issues in
this case?
Now she can’t find the resources to pay for her prescriptions; the doctor who
had been her prescriber has retired and there’s no other provider within
cooee of her home in rural Victoria, and it seems that the clinic she
wanted to attend is probably going to close down.
What human rights issues are involved in this issue? What steps could you
take to help her deal with these issues?
Definitions in the Charter
Human Rights
– Basically Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
– Include any other right or freedom recognised by law
– Belong to people, not corporations
‘Public Authority’ must respect them, including:
– Public servants and statutory officers, local
government
– Statutory entity with functions ‘of a public nature’
– Any entity with functions of a public nature when
exercising them on behalf of the state or a public
authority
HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTED BY
THE CHARTER ARE:
•Recognition and equality before the law
•Protection of families and children
• As a person;
• without discrimination; •Taking part in public life
• To equal protection of the law;
and •Cultural rights
• special programs for
•Property rights
disadvantaged are permitted
•Life •Right to liberty and security of person
•Protection from cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment •Humane treatment when deprived of liberty
•Forced work •Children in the criminal process have
•Freedom of expression special rights
•Peaceful assembly and freedom of
•Fair hearing for an accused criminal
association
•Freedom of movement •Rights in criminal proceedings
•Privacy and reputation
•Right not to be tried or punished more than
•Freedom of thought, conscience, religion once
and belief
•Retrospective criminal laws not allowed
How the Charter works
• Parliament intends to establish a culture of respect for Human Rights in
Victoria
CHALLENGING DISCRIMINATION
A psychiatric hospital had a practice of sectioning asylum seekers who didn’t speak English without
an interpreter. An NGO successfully challenged this practice on human rights ground: it was a
breach of their right not to be discriminated against on the basis of language, and their right to
liberty.
PROMOTING PARTICIPATION
A disability support team had a policy of providing support to users who wanted to participate in
social activities, but refused to provide a worker for a gay man who wanted to go to a gay pub.
Heterosexual users regularly went to clubs and pubs of their choice. The man’s advocate
challenged this on the basis of the man’s right to respect for his privacy and not to be
discriminated against on the basis of sexuality
And . .
Challenging brutality
A mentally ill young man placed in residential care for treatment was found bruised by
his parents, who raised the issue with the managers and felt their concerns were
dismissed, and their visiting rights were then removed. The parents challenged this
on the basis of their son’s right not to be treated in an inhumane and degrading
way and respect for family life.
Positive steps to protect human rights
A social worker used human rights language to get accommodation for a woman and
children fleeing from a violent prtner. She argued the housing authority had a
positive duty to protect them from inhumane and degrading treatment and to
protection of their lives.
Another social worker managed to invoke a local authority’s positive obligation to
protect a man suffering from panic disorder to get them to issue him with a bus
pass, because he could not use public transport effectively – i.e. had to get off the
bus every few minutes to calm down
And particularly
Using human rights to get resources
An advocate successfully argued that an aged woman with mental illness and
disturbed behaviour while in hospital for treatment should not be moved from the
hospital and put into residential care against her wishes, on cost grounds, because
she had the human right to privacy and choice, and so resources were found to
support her care at home, where she wanted to live.
A disabled woman’s payments were reduced to the point where she could no longer
afford a personal assistant to help her with toileting, leading to aggravation of her
serious kidney condition.
Challenging blanket policies
The education authority policy provided school transport for children with special needs
who lived more than 3 miles from school and refused to provide it to a child living
2.8 miles away, unable to travel independently. This was successfully challenged
on the basis of its being a disproportionate interference with the child’s right to
private life
Create your own case study
SO WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?
1. Adopt a Human Rights Based
Approach to services
• If you are contracted/funded to provide a ‘government service’, you may
be a ‘public authority’ yourself, for those functions, and need to comply
with the Charter
• Every employee in your service needs to understand Charter Rights and
how they work
• Breaches of charter considerations may mean public decisions or actions
can be challenged as unlawfully made, and at the very least, should be
remade
• Can’t ‘sue’ over breach of a Charter right, but can lobby, argue and utilise
existing laws and e.g. ombudsman, internal review processes, VCAT, anti
discrimination laws,
• VEOHRC can intervene in legal action, review (by invitation) a public
authority, and must report on the first four years of the charter’s
effectiveness
2. A HRBA to our work
• Claim human rights as a tool for social change and in
our own work
• Use human rights arguments while having a central
voice in policy debates
• Use HRBAs in our own work and partnerships
• Prioritise human rights in our work, raising
awareness and capacity – how can issues we work
on relate to human rights issues
• Identifying human rights principles we already work
to
• Work in dialogue and partnerships to raise
awareness and use of human rights tools to
influence and challenge discriminatory assumptions
about our clients
3. Use a checklist for action
1. FRED. Does this situation raise human rights issues?
2. What specific human rights are affected?
3. Who owns those rights?
4. Who or what is responsible for respecting and considering those rights?
5. Has the responsible decision-maker considered those rights having regard
to due process?
6. If the human right has been limited by the decision-maker, is the limitation
Reasonable.
– Demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society based upon
human dignity, equality and freedom? and
– did it take into account all relevant factors?
• The nature of the right
• The importance of the purpose of the limitation
• The nature and extent of the limitation
• The relationship between the limitation and its purpose
• Any less restrictive means reasonably available to achieve the
purpose that the limitation seeks ?
4. Use Charter Opportunities
Set the agenda – don’t accept decision makers’
preferences e.g. about allocation of resources
British Institute of Human Rights report, The Human Rights Act – Changing
Lives. Website www.bihr.org.uk