0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
17 visualizzazioni17 pagine
1) The document discusses seismic fragility analysis of irregular reinforced concrete (RC) structures with masonry infills using STAAD Pro software.
2) It explains key concepts like fragility curves and their advantages in predicting earthquake damage.
3) Different types of vertical irregularities in buildings are described, including stiffness, mass, geometric, and discontinuity irregularities.
4) Load combinations, modeling and analysis procedures, and future work are outlined. References on seismic fragility functions and codes are also provided.
1) The document discusses seismic fragility analysis of irregular reinforced concrete (RC) structures with masonry infills using STAAD Pro software.
2) It explains key concepts like fragility curves and their advantages in predicting earthquake damage.
3) Different types of vertical irregularities in buildings are described, including stiffness, mass, geometric, and discontinuity irregularities.
4) Load combinations, modeling and analysis procedures, and future work are outlined. References on seismic fragility functions and codes are also provided.
1) The document discusses seismic fragility analysis of irregular reinforced concrete (RC) structures with masonry infills using STAAD Pro software.
2) It explains key concepts like fragility curves and their advantages in predicting earthquake damage.
3) Different types of vertical irregularities in buildings are described, including stiffness, mass, geometric, and discontinuity irregularities.
4) Load combinations, modeling and analysis procedures, and future work are outlined. References on seismic fragility functions and codes are also provided.
Structure With Masonry Infills Using Staad Pro Fragility curve Fragility curves is a statistical tool representing the probability of exceeding a given damage state (or performance) as a function of an engineering demand parameter that represents the ground motion (preferably spectral displacement at a given frequency) Advantages of Fragility Curves ● The fragility curves are established to provide a prediction of potential damage during an earthquake. ● The fragility function is also directly used to reduce damage cost and loss of life during a seismic event. ● Apart from the mainshock, probability aftershock must also be investigated to decide whether or when to permit re-occupancy of a building. ● Fragility curves are commonly used in civil engineering to assess the vulnerability of structures to earthquakes. Regular And Irregular Buildings Buildings having simple & regular geometry and uniformly distributed mass and stiffness in plan as well as elevation, suffer much less damage. These are called Regular buildings. Irregular buildings are of two types. ● PLAN IRREGULARITIES ● VERTICAL IRREGULARITIES Types Of Vertical Irregularities 1. Stiffness irregularity: Under stiffness irregularity the stiffness of the members in a frame are not equal and they vary according to the floor height, modulus of elasticity of concrete and moment of inertia of that member. 2. Mass Irregularity :- Mass irregularity shall be considered to exist where the seismic weight of any storey is more than 200 percent of that of its adjacent storeys. In case of roof irregularity need not be considered.
3. Vertical Geometric Irregular :- A structure is
considered to be vertical geometric irregular when the horizontal dimension of the lateral force resisting system in any storey is more than 200 percent of that in its adjacent storey. In case of roofs irregularity need not be considered. 4. In-plane discontinuity in vertical lateral force- resisting element: An in-plane offset of the lateral load- resisting elements greater than the length of those elements.
5. Discontinuity in capacity (Weak storey):A weak
storey is one in which the storey strength is less than 80 % of that in the storey above. Assumptions used in earthquake resistant design ● Earthquake ground motions are complex and irregular, consisting of several frequencies and of varying amplitudes each lasting for a small duration. Therefore, usually, resonance of the type as visualized under steady-state sinusoidal excitations will not occur, as it would need time to build up such amplitudes ● Earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with high wind, maximum flood or maximum sea waves. ● The values of elastic modulus of materials, wherever required, will be taken as for static analysis, unless more definite values are available for use in dynamic conditions [see IS 456, IS 800, IS 1343, IS 1905 and IS 2974 (Parts 1 to 5)]. Different Earthquake zones India has been divided into 4 EQ zone namely:
ZONE II, ZONE III , ZONE IV, ZONE V.
The Zone factor as per IS code 1892:2016 are:
F=m*a a=z*g Z=zone factor Load Combination for Earthquake Loading 1) 1.2 [DL + IL ± (ELX ± 0.3 ELY ± 0.3 ELZ)] and 1.2 [DL + IL ± (ELY ± 0.3 ELX ± 0.3 ELZ)]; 2) 1.5 [DL ± (ELX ± 0.3 ELY ± 0.3 ELZ) and 1.5 [DL + IL ± (ELY ± 0.3 ELX ± 0.3 ELZ)];
3) 0.9 DL ± 1.5 (ELX ± 0.3 ELY ± 0.3 ELZ) and
0.9 DL ± 1.5 (ELY ± 0.3 ELX ± 0.3 ELZ).
Future Work ● Modelling of G+3 building using Staad pro & analysis of the building
○ Static analysis
○ Response spectrum analysis
○ Time history analysis
● Developing the fragility curves for different earthquake accelerations.
Research paper studied : ● T.Choudhary and H.B Kaushik(2018),Seismic fragility function for without vertical irregularity reinforced concrete frames.
Seismic fragility functions are essential for performance-based seismic
design of structures.
A common practice in the past to consider global demand parameters,
such as peak roof displacement or drift in a building to estimate its seismic fragility. Maximum demand is mostly concentrated at the level of irregularity.
To investigate the matter, reinforced concrete frames with and without
vertical irregularity (soft storey) were considered References ● T.Choudhary and H.B kaushik(2018),Seismic fragility function for without vertical irregularity reinforced concrete frames. ● Trishna choudhary and Hemant B. KAushik (2018): component level fragility estimation for vertical irregular Reinforced concrete frames,Journal of Earthquake engineering. ● IS : 1893 –part -4 – 2016: Criteria For Earthquake Design Of Structures. ● IS : 4326 – 1976: Code Of Practice For Earthquake Resistant Design And Construction Of Buildings ● IS : 13920 – 2016: Code Of Practice For Ductile Detailing Of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected To Seismic Forces ● SP: 22 – Explanatory Handbook On Codes For Earthquake Engineering