Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
7877
otherwise known as the
Anti-Sexual Harassment
Act of 1995
AN ACT DECLARING SEXUAL HARASSMENT UNLAWFUL IN THE EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION OR
TRAINING ENVIRONMENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
ADDENDUM: CSC RESOLUTION NO. 01-0940, MAY 21, 2001 (ADMINISTRATIVE DISCIPLINARY
RULES ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASES IN THE CIVIL SERVICE)
Introduction: What is the issue in SH?
Section 2. Declaration of Policy. – The State shall value the dignity of every
individual, enhance the development of its human resources, guarantee full
respect for human rights, and uphold the dignity of workers, employees,
applicants for employment, students or those undergoing training, instruction
or education. Towards this end, all forms of sexual harassment in the
employment, education or training environment are declared unlawful.
Section 3. Work, Education or training-Related, Sexual Harassment Defined. –
Work, education or training-related sexual harassment is committed by an
employer, employee, manager, supervisor, agent of the employer, teacher,
instructor, professor, coach, trainor, or any other person who, having authority,
influence or moral ascendancy over another in a work or training or education
environment, demands, requests or otherwise require any sexual favor from
the other, regardless of whether the demand, request or requirement for
submission is accepted by the object of said act.
Who are the offenders?
1. Employer; 7. Instructor;
2. Employee; 8. Professor;
3. Manager; 9. Coach;
4. Supervisor; 10. Trainor;
5. Agent of the employer; 11. Any other person
6. Teacher;
Note: Who have authority, influence or moral ascendancy over the victim
When SH committed in a
Work-related or employment
environment [Section 3(a)]
1. The sexual favor is made as a condition in the hiring or in the
employment, re-employment or continued employment of said individual,
or in granting said individual favorable compensation, term of conditions,
promotions, or privileges; or the refusal to grant the sexual favor results in
limiting, segregating or classifying the employee which in any way would
discriminate, deprive or diminish employment opportunities or otherwise
adversely affect said employee;
2. The above acts would impair the employee’s rights or privileges under
existing labor laws; or
3. The above acts would result in an intimidating, hostile or otherwise
offensive environment.
When SH committed in an education
or training environment [Section 3(b)].
1. Against one who is under the care, custody or supervision of the offender;
2. Against one whose education, training, apprenticeship or tutorship is entrusted to
the offender;
3. When the sexual favor is made a condition to the giving of a passing grade, or the
granting of honors and scholarships, or the payment of a stipend, allowance or
other benefits, privileges, or consideration; or
4. When the sexual advances result in intimidating, hostile or offensive environment
for the student, trainee or apprentice.
Note: Any person who directs or induces another to commit any act of sexual
harassment, or who cooperates in the commission thereof by another without which
it would not have been committed, shall also be held liable.
Duty of the Employer, etc..[Section 4]
The employer, etc..shall be solidarily liable for damages arising from the acts of SH committed if the
employer, etc..is INFORMED of such acts by the offended party and NO IMMEDIATE ACTION IS
TAKEN.
Any person who violates the provisions of RA 7877, upon conviction, be penalized by imprisonment
of not less than one (1) month nor more than six (6) months, or a fine of not less than P10,000.00 nor
more than P20,000.00, or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court[Section 7].
Any action arising from the violation of RA 7877 shall prescribe in 3 years.
However, the law’s (RA7877) definition of SH is limiting and presupposes the existence of authority,
influence or moral ascendancy between the offender and the offended party. It does not
specifically address the issue of “HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT” resulting from SH between peers or co-
employees. Cases in which both the offender and the offended party are peers or have the same
rank or status, or when the offended party is the superior officer in a work or education environment
cannot be considered as SH since these acts are not within the scope of the current Anti-SH Law.
Owing to this, the CSC promulgated the Administrative Disciplinary Rules on Sexual Harassment
Cases through Resolution No. 01-0940, dated May 21, 2001 which, among others:
1. Takes into account not only the Anti-Sexual Harassment Law of 1995 as legal basis but also the
Philippine Constitution, the Administrative Code of 1987 as well as the Vienna Declaration and
Programme of Action and the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action;
2. Lays down the procedural rules governing the handling and disposition of administrative cases
involving SH;
3. Specifies the various categories of SH (i.e. light, less grave and grave acts of SH) and their
corresponding penalties; and
4. Directs all government offices and agencies to formulate their own administrative rules on SH
cases.
Notably, the CSC Rule removed the requirement of the law that the offender should be one with
authority, influence or moral ascendancy over the victim, hence, it also covers SH among peers.
CSC Resolution No. 01-0940, May 21
2001 (Administrative Disciplinary Rules
on SH Cases in the Civil Service).
The administrative offense of SH defined.
SH is an act, or a series of acts, involving any unwelcome sexual advance, request or demand for
a sexual favor, or other verbal or physical behavior of a sexual nature, committed by a
government employee or official in a work-related, training or education related environment of
the person complained of.
Work related SH: When?
1. submission to or rejection of the act or series of acts is used as a basis for any employment
decision (including, but not limited to, matters related to hiring, promotion, raise in salary, job
security, benefits and any other personnel action) affecting the applicant employee; or
2. The act of series of acts have the purpose or effect of interfering with the complainant’s work
performance, or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment; or
3. The act or series of acts might reasonably be expected to cause discrimination, insecurity,
discomfort, offense or humiliation to a complainant who may be a co-employee, applicant,
customer, or word of the person complained of.
Education or training-related sexual harassment. When?
It is committed against one who is under the actual or constructive care, custody or supervision
of the offender, or against one whose education, training, apprenticeship, internship or tutorship
is directly or constructively entrusted to, or is provided by, the offender.
Submission to or rejection of the act or series of acts as a basis for any decision affecting the
complainant, including, but not limited to, the giving of grade, the granting of honors or a
scholarship, the payment of stipend or allowance, or the giving of any benefit, privilege or
consideration;
The act or series of acts have the purpose or effect of interfering with the performance, or
creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive academic environment of the complainant; or
The act or series of acts might reasonably expected to cause discrimination, insecurity,
discomfort, offense or humiliation to a complainant who may be a trainee, apprentice,
intern, tutee or ward of the person complained of.
Where Sexual Harassment may take
place.
Any government official or employee, regardless of sex, is liable for sexual harassment
when he/she:
1. Directly participates in the execution of any act of sexual harassment as defined by
these Rules;
2. Induces or directs another or others to commit sexual harassment as defined by these
Rules;
3. Cooperates in the commission of sexual harassment by another through an act without
which the sexual harassment would not have been accomplished;
4. Cooperates in the commission of sexual harassment by another through previous or
simultaneous acts.
COMMITTEE ON DECORUM AND
INVESTIGATION OF SH CASES
A Committee on Decorum and Investigation shall be created in all national or local agencies of the
government, state colleges and universities, including GOCC with original charter.
Function:
1. Receive complaints of sexual harassment;
2. Investigate sexual harassment complaints in accordance with the prescribed procedure;
3. Submit a report of its findings with the corresponding recommendation to the disciplining
authority for decision. (Note: During the preliminary investigation, proceedings before the
committee shall be held under strict confidentiality.)
4. Lead in the conduct of discussions about SH within the agency or institution to increase
understanding and prevent incidents of SH.
Note: Pre-filing stage.
The agency may adopt mechanisms to provide assistance to an alleged victim of SH which may
include counseling, referral to an agency offering professional help, and advice on options
available before the filing of the complaint.
STANDARD PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS
I. Complaint.
1. The complaint may be filed with the disciplining authority (DA) of the office or
agency, or with the Committee on Decorum and Investigation (CODAI).
2. The complaint must be in writing, signed and sworn to by the complainant. It
shall contain the following:
A. the full name and address of the complainant;
B. the full name, address, and position of the respondent;
C. a brief statement of the relevant facts;
D. evidence, in support of the complainant, if any;
E. a certification of non-forum shopping.
Note: If the complaint is not under oath, the complainant shall be summoned
by the CODAI to swear to the truth of the allegations in the complaint.
Complaints sent by telegram, radiogram, electronic mail or similar means of communication shall
be considered NON-FILED unless the complainant shall comply with the requirements provided in
Number 2 above.
Withdrawal of the complaint at any stage of the proceedings shall NOT preclude the CODAI from
proceeding with the investigation where there is OBVIOUS TRUTH or MERIT to the allegations in the
complaint or where there is documentary or direct evidence that can prove the guilt of the person
complained of.
Upon receipt of the complaint, the CODAI shall require the respondent to submit a counter-
affidavit/Comment under oath within three (3) from receipt of the notice. Thereafter, the CODAI will
conduct preliminary investigation (PI) which shall commence within five (5) days from receipt of the
complaint and shall be terminated within fifteen (15) working days.
Within five (5) working days from the termination of the PI, the CODAI shall submit an investigation
report and the complete records of the case to the DA. If a prima facie case is established during
the investigation, a formal charge shall be issued by the DA within three (3) working days from
receipt of the investigation report. In the absence of prima facie case, the complaint shall be
dismissed.
Preventive suspension:
Upon the recommendation of the CODAI, at anytime after service of
the formal charge, the DA may order the preventive suspension of
the respondent during the formal investigation, if there are reasons to
believe that respondent is probably guilty of the charges which
would warrant respondent’s removal from the service.
An order of preventive suspension may be issued to temporarily
remove the respondent from the scene of his/her misfeasance or
malfeasance and to preclude the possibility of his/her exerting undue
influence or pressure on the witnesses against him/her or tampering
of documentary evidence on file with his office.
The Formal Charge shall contain:
A. a specification of the charge(s);
B. a brief statement of material or relevant facts, accompanied by certified true copies of the
documentary evidence, if any;
C. sworn statements covering the testimony of witnesses;
D. a directive to answer the charge(s) in writing under oath in not less than seventy-two (72) hours from
receipt thereof;
E. An advice for the respondent to indicate in his/her answer whether or not he/she elects a formal
investigation of the charge(s);
F. a notice that he/she is entitled to be assisted by a counsel of his/her choice.
Note: If the respondent has already submitted a comment/counter-affidavit, respondent shall be allowed
to submit additional evidence.
No request for clarification, bills of particulars or motions to dismiss (prohibited pleadings).
Failure to file an answer, formal investigation will commence.
Formal investigation is a trial type hearing, however, parties may submit position paper/memoranda after
the pre-hearing conference and submit the case for resolution based on the position paper/memoranda
without further hearing.
CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS OF SH
The head of office who fails to act within fifteen (15) days from receipt of any complaint for SH properly
filed against any employee in that office shall be charged with NEGLECT OF DUTY;
Light Offense:
1. 1st offense – Reprimand;
2. 2nd offense – Fine or suspension not less than thirty (30) days and not exceeding six (6) months;
3. 3rd offense – Dismissal.
Less Grave Offense:
1. 1st offense – Fine or suspension of not less than thirty (30) days and not exceeding six (6) months;
2. 2nd offense – Dismissal.
Grave offense:
1. 1st offense – Dismissal.
Note: If the respondent is found guilty of two or more charges or counts, the penalty to be imposed should be that
corresponding to the most serious charge or count and the rest shall be considered as aggravating circumstances.
Jacinto vs. Serrano, G.R. No. 175433, March 11, 2015
Respondent grab the victim’s face and kissed her on her lips and told the
latter and “sarap mo talaga”
The court finds the sexual harassment committed falls under less grave
offenses which is analogous to “unwanted touching or brushing against a
victim’s body” and to “derogatory or degrading remarks or innuendos
directed toward members of one sex”, with the corresponding maximum
penalty of six (6) months without pay.
End of lecture.
GOOD MORNING!