Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
AUTHORS OF approach in 1975, and founded the Hardiness Institute in 1984. The author of
nearly 100 papers, he is internationally recognized as a leader in psychology,
OUR KEY and continues to win prestigious awards for his hardiness-based consulting
and research work. An international survey in 1986 named him among the top
TEXTS – 175 psychologists in the world.
ORIGINALLY • Deborah M. Khoshaba has been a professional psychologist for the past
fifteen years and is director of Program Development and Training at the
PUBLISHED Hardiness Institute. Deborah teaches graduate students in psychology at
Pepperdine University, and lectures for psychology undergraduates at the
IN 1950! University of California, at Irvine. Her professional activities and published
works include the areas of resilience, coping, and human potential.
Organizations the authors have consulted to include Kawasaki, the University
of Southern California, Illinois Bell Telephone, and Baxter HealthCare
Corporation.They have appeared on CNN and in the New York Times, Los
Angeles Times, and the Washington Post. Both authors live in Laguna Beach,
California
THE ILLINOIS BELL
TELEPHONE PROJECT
Hypothesis: “whether stressful changes
enliven or destroy depends upon how
one responds to them.”
• They evaluated roughly 450 male
and female supervisors, managers,
and decision makers at IBT, through
yearly interviews, psychological
tests, medical examinations, and
work-performance reviews.
THE ILLINOIS • In 1981, six years into the study, the U.S. Federal Court ordered
• The courage and motivation of the three resilient attitudes bring about the skills of
transformational coping and social support
• The resilient IBT employees transformed stressful changes to their advantage. First, they entered into a
thought process that placed the changes into a broader perspective, taking the sting out of them, so to
speak.
• A common way they broadened their perspective was to see a particular stress as happening to lots of
other people. This made them feel less alone in their pain and struggle. As the broader perspectives
made the stressful circumstances a bit more tolerable, they could then think about them long enough
to deepen their understanding of them, which led to well-considered, innovative plans and problem
solving actions.
• This is a classic hands-on approach—get a firm grip on change and what it really means, then turn the
situation to your advantage—as opposed to breaking down or acting precipitously in the face of
change.
• In handling stressful changes in this direct manner, the resilient employees interacted by
engaging others rather than by alienating them.
MANAGER
Chuck clearly anticipated the
He seemed to thrive on deregulation’s more stressful
changes that made the most aspects, but saw it as a
of his talents and capabilities. stimulus to his and the
company’s growth.
Chuck said he experienced customer relations
work as more challenging than before, although
still manageable
Finally, they adopted his plan, put him in charge of implementing it, and allocated the
necessary resources to him.
RESILIENCE AT HOME
Chuck also responsively attended to his family’s needs, despite his strong commitment to
work.
His two children were just about to enter college. When they moved out of the
family home, Chuck’s wife planned to return to school to finish a college degree she
had long ago interrupted.
Human beings typically encounter a variety of difficulties and challenges during the course
of their lives, ranging from daily hassles to major life events.
• ‘‘The personal qualities that enables one to thrive in the face of adversity’’ (Connor &
Davidson, 2003, p. 76).
• ‘‘The capacity of individuals to cope successfully with significant change, adversity or risk’’
(Lee & Cranford, 2008, p. 213).
READING PASSAGES – PAGE 17
The majority of theories incorporate the notion that resilience is a dynamic process
that changes over time. Furthermore, most researchers acknowledge that, within the
process itself, the interaction of a wide range of factors determines whether an individual
demonstrates resilience.
READING PASSAGES – PAGE 17
One of the main contributions of Richardson (2002) and colleagues (1990) is the
presentation of their resiliency model. In the model, the resilience process begins with a state
of biopsychospiritual homeostasis, or a comfort zone, where a person is in balance
physically, mentally, and spiritually. Disruption from this homeostatic state occurs if an
individual has insufficient resources (i.e., protective factors) to buffer him or her against
stressors, adversities, or life events.
Summary: Resilience is about dealing with being out of your comfort zone.
A STRESS VACCINE?
IMPROVE MY
REFLECTIVE
LEARNING A useful starting point for reflection is to identify a
‘critical incident’ (Brookfield 1987) this doesn’t have
CAPACITY? to be a dramatic event it merely has to have
triggered a series of thoughts which result in the
student learning something new about themselves.
Record Record your development
• Khoshaba, D.M. & Maddi, S.R. (2005) Resilience at work: How to succeed no matter what life throws at
you. New York: Amacom
• Khoshaba, D. M., & Maddi, S. R. (1999). Early experiences in hardiness development. Consult Psychol J, 51,
106–116.
• Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1–11
• Maddi, S. R. (2002). The story of hardiness: twenty years of theorizing, research, and practice. Consult
Psychol J 54:173–185. Maddi, S. R. (2004). Hardiness: An operationalization of existential courage. J
Humanist Psychol, 44, 279–298.
• Maddi, S. R. (2005). On hardiness and other pathways to resilience. Am Psychol, 60, 261–262.
SOME OTHER RELATED WORKS
• Maddi, S. R., & Kobasa, S. C. (1984). The hardy executive: health under stress. Homewood, IL:
Dow Jones-Irwin. (One chapter reprinted in A. Monat & R. S. Lazarus (Eds.), Stress and coping:
An anthology (2nd and 3rd Eds.). New York: Columbia University Press).
• Maddi, S. R. (2006). Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. The Journal of Positive
Psychology, 1(3), 160-168).
• Maddi, S. R., Harvey, R., Khoshaba, D. M., Lu, J., Persico, M. & Brow, M. (2006). The personality
construct of hardiness, III: Relationships with repression, innovativeness, authoritarianism, and
performance. Journal of Personality, 74, 575-598.
• Maddi, S. R. (2006). Relevance of hardiness assessment and training to the military context.
Military Psychology, 19 (1), in press.
PLANNING YOUR ASSIGNMENT
• One example of when I found that I was not able to manage my time effectively came last year when I was completing a proposal for my
company. I will analyse this using Kolb‘’s ‘what, then what, so what’ reflective framework (2000), as it is a straightforward reflective
framework that will allow me to clearly articulate my thoughts for professional growth (Roe, 2011)
What?
I was tasked with completing a proposal in a short time period, while I had several other tasks that needed to be completed.
So What?
I didn’t manage my time effectively and I tried to complete all of the projects by working on them at the same time. This led to me
getting confused, even though I had good intentions, I didn’t stop and pick the most effective way of dealing with the workload.
Then What?
After reflecting on this experience. I believe that in future it’d be best for me to take a minimum of 30 minutes to plan out how I will
tackle work to short deadlines. I can then choose which task to complete first and which tasks are the highest priority. This can therefore
improve my ability to manage my time and ensure I don’t miss deadlines again, which is important for my professional development and
achieving my career goals.