Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By
Eng. Mtango,F. F.
DISTRICT WATER ENGINEER-HANANG’
Introduction and background
Water sector Development Programme (2006-2025) was
launched in Tanzania in 2006. The objective of the programme
is to alleviate poverty through improvements in the governance
of water resources management and the sustainable delivery of
water supply and sanitation services.
Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) No. 6, Ensure availability
and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.
Has a target to achieve universal and equitable access to safe
and affordable drinking water for all by 2030.
In JMP (2012) it was foreseen that “Measuring actual
sustainability of both water & sanitation facilities remains an
area that could benefit from further attention.
It was agreed by WHO in 2012 that, there was no broadly agreed-
upon standards against which sustainability should be
measured. Indeed, ‘sustainable access’, has not been
adequately defined in measurable terms, particularly since
sustainability involves so many dimensions
Dimensions of rural WS sustainability
(WHO,2012)
Management
Technical Financial
RURAL WS
Institutional SUSTAINABILITY
Environmental
Social
Outstanding Challenges-Water supply
coverage trend in Tanzania-Rural.
COVERAGE
80 Coverage by
70 functionality
Abnomal
60
decrease in
50 coverage
40 2009-2012
30
COVERAGE Kink of 2012 to
20 2013 is because of
change of mode of
10 assessing coverage
(BRN -intervention
0 on coverage)
•Despite of initial pilot projects(quick wins), the water supply coverage decreased from
58.7% in 2009 to 57% in 2012.
•Last year , 40% of 123,888 WPs constructed from WSDP 1 not function if they were
functioning, coverage could be 85% ( MoW - Apr.2018) :, 56.7% coverage in 2018.
Outstanding Challenges contd.
What activities should be Prioritized?
we
n e
wf
n f
wt
nt
w
ni
Fe N Ff N Ft N i
Fi N
wm
n m
w
n s
Fm N s Fs N
Weighting factors (from survey of water Weight
Where N = Total number of ICWP Engineers & other water experts)
F= number of factors in an aspect we
Weighting factor due to the effect of envir, 0.154
Ʃne= npq + nps + nsf.
Ʃnf= nci + nbm + nie + nbf + nrs
wf
Weighting factor due to the effect of finance 0.183
+ nrt:
wt
Weighting factor due to technical effects 0.155
Ʃnt= neb + nrl + nnr + nts + nmt wi
Weighting factor due institutional effects 0.164
Ʃni= ncv + nls + nas + nmd wm
Weighting factor due to the effect of
Ʃnm= nom + nae + nap + npr + nrd management 0.189
Ʃns= ncp + npw + nvh + npc ws
Definition of terms
The parameters defined are 27 factors that affect sustainability of rural water schemes as
shown below:-
• nps -Number of ICWP in which sources are protected
• nsf -Number of ICWP where water flows at least 11 months per year
• npq -Number of ICWP with good water quality
• nci -Number of ICWP with history of satisfactory capital investment
• nbm -Number of ICWP where tariff is per bucket/metered i.e not a flat rate
• nie -Number of ICWP where income and expenditure reported(book keeping)
• nbf -Number of ICWP where water funds are banked
• nrs -Number of ICWP With reserved spare parts for repair
• nrt -Number of ICWP where tariffs are reasonable
• neb -Number of ICWP where external backstopping is done
• nrl -Number of ICWP where repair is done locally
• nnr -Number of ICWP not directly affected by NRV such as leakages, etc
• nts -Number of ICWP where there is at least one technical staff.
• nmt -Number of ICWP where water is metered
• ncv -Number of ICWP where there is active COWSOs/VWC
Definition of terms contd.
• nls -Number of ICWP with institutional linkage and support
• nas -Number of ICWP where spare parts can be accessed within the ward
• nmd- Number of ICWP where monitoring by other institution was done
• nom -Number of ICWP with Operation and maintenance plan
• nap -Number of ICWP where COWSO is autonomous or privately
operated
• nae –Number of ICWP in which there is adherence to equity in providing
services.
• npr Number of ICWP without political or religion interference in
operation and management.
• nrd Number of ICWP where reporting is done
• ncp -Number of ICWP where community were involved from the planning
to execution
• npw -Number of ICWP where community has tendency to pay for water
• nvh -Number of ICWP without history of vandalism of any type
• npc -Number of ICWP where no PC around for alternative water fetching
Methodology
The sample villages were selected based on the WS technology.
The phone surveys were conducted with the list, name and
location of ICWP known from the data available (WPs updated
monthly mainly used for PbR scheme fund allocations). The caller
use the ready-made questionnaire containing twenty seven
questions (equivalent to the number of factors affecting
sustainability).Questions were answered alternatively by min. of
two people among COWSOs administration. If one reply first
question, the other was left with second and so on. After each
response, the ICWP was either tallied up (if it +vely affected
sustainability) or left out (if it -vely affected sustainability) based
on the factor at a column in question. Finally, in one
village/scheme, the numerical total number of ICWP at a
particular factor column was filled in an excel sheet 1 . The data
were then transferred to the tool equation (simplified calculations
in an excel sheet 2) for calculations. Sustainability and
functionality rate were finally obtained in this sheet.
Results: Functionality and sustainability
Comparison functionality
False functionality
1.20
sustainability
1.00
Coverage in %
0.80
True functionality
0.60
0.40
0.20
-
Villages