CONTROLLING RISKS AND LOSS • Concealment • Representation • Exceptions • Warranties • Condition • RISK- chance of loss, or the possibility of the occurrence of a loss, based on known and unknown factors • PERIL – the contingent or unknown event which may cause a loss that one insures against. Its existence creates the risk and its occurrence results to loss • HAZARD- condition or factor, tangible or intangible, which may create or increase the chance of loss from a given peril 4 PRIMARY CONCERNS OF THE PARTIES TO AN INSURANCE CONTRACT 1. Determine if loss occurs, and if so, the Amount thereof (CONDITION) 2. Control of risk to guard against increase of risk (WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS) 3. Correct estimation of risk which enables insurer to determine if he will approve the policy application and if so at what premium rate (CONCEALMENT AND REPRESENTATION 4 PRIMARY CONCERNS OF THE PARTIES TO AN INSURANCE CONTRACT 4. Precise delimitation of the risk which determines the extent of the contingent duty to pay undertaken by the insurer (EXCEPTION) CONCEALMENT Neglect to communicate that which a party knows and ought to communicate • Party concealing is duty bound to disclose a material fact which he neglects to do so • Other party has no means of ascertaining the fact concealed • Party concealing makes no warranty as to the fact concealed • Party concealing knows such fact • Concealment takes place at the time contract was entered into, not afterwards The duty of disclosure ends with the completion and effectivity of the contract. Failure to communicate info acquired after the effectivity of the policy will not be a ground to rescind the contract . Info is no longer material as it will no longer influence the other party to enter into such contract (Agos v Phil Am Life Insurance) Materiality is determined not by the event, but solely by the probable and reasonable influence of the facts upon the party to whom the communication is due, in forming his estimate of the advantages of the proposed contract or in making his inquiries • Insured need not die of the disease he had failed to disclose to the insurer. It is sufficient that his non-disclosure misled the insurer in forming his estimates of the risks of the proposed insurance policy or in making inquiries (Sunlife vs CA) Materiality: Ordinary vs Marine Insurance ORDINARY INS MARINE INSURANCE FACT OF FACT OF CONCEALMENT IN CONCEALMENT BY ANY OF THE MATTERS INSURED GIVES ENUMERATED IN SEC 112 OF THE INSURER THE INSURANCE CODE DOES NOT RIGHT TO RESCIND VITIATE THE ENTIRE CONTRACT. THE CONTRACT OF INSURER IS EXONERATED ONLY INSURANCE IF THE FACT CONCEALED IS THE CAUSE OF THE LOSS. OTHERWISE, INSURER WILL Materiality: Ordinary vs Marine Insurance ORDINARY INS MARINE INSURANCE BELIEF AND BELIEF AND EXPECTATIONS OF EXPECTATION OF THIRD PERSONS NEED TO BE THIRD PERSONS DISCLOSED IF RELATING TO NEED NOT BE MATERIAL FACTS DISCLOSED RULES on concealment are more strict in marine insurance due to the difference in the character of the property and the greater facility the insurer possesses in obtaining information as to its conditions and surrounding circumstances which are often insured when absent or afloat EFFECT OF CONCEALMENT • By the insured – contract becomes voidable at the insurer’s option (recession of contract) • By the insurer – contract becomes voidable at the insured’s option as the duty of utmost good faith is breached by concealment Reason: contractual duty of disclosure imposed by utmost good faith is not required of the insured alone, but is imposed with equal stringency upon the insurer since the insurer’s dominant bargaining position carries with it a stricter responsibility • Burden of proof- party claiming the existence of concealment must prove that there was knowledge of the fact concealed on the part of the party charged with concealment • Good faith not a defense – concealment whether intentional or unintentional entitles the injured party to rescind the contract of insurance MATTERS THAT NEED NOT BE DISCLOSED IN THE ABSENCE OF I NQUIRIES • Those which prove or tend to prove the existence of a risk excluded by a warranty, and which are not otherwise material • Those which the other knows • Those of which the other waives communication • Those which, in the exercise of ordinary care, the other ought to know and of which, the former has no reason to suppose him ignorant • Those which relate to a risk excepted from the policy and which are not otherwise material • Information of the nature or amount of the interest of one insured except as prescribed by sec 51 of the Code. Note: However, a policy of insurance must specify the interest of the insured in property insured, if he is not the absolute owner thereof like mortgagee. But there is no need to disclose the interest in the property insured if it is absolute MATTERS THAT NEED NOT BE DISCLOSED EVEN IN ANSWER TO INQUIRIES • Information of his own Judgment except marine insurance • General causes which are open to his inquiry, equally with the other, and all general usages of trade MATTERS THAT MUST BE DISCLOSED EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF INQUIRY • Those which the other has no means of ascertaining • Those material to the contract • Those which the party with the duty to communicate makes No warranty Proof of fraud in concealment • Insurer need not prove fraud in order to rescind the contract on the ground of concealment except falsity of warranty which must be intentional and fraudulent for the contract to be rescinded Reason: If it were necessary for the insurance company to show actual fraud on the part of the insured, then it is plain that it would be impossible for it to protect itself and its honest policyholders against fraudulent and improper claims. It would be wholly at the mercy of anyone who wished to apply for insurance, as it would be impossible to show actual fraud except in the extreme cases (Saturnino v Phil Am Life insurance) Exception: falsity of warranty must be intentional and fraudulent for the contract to be rescinded WAIVER OF INFORMATION • EXPRESS- buy the terms of the contract • IMPLIED – failure to make an inquiry as to such facts, where they are distinctly implied in other facts from which information is communicated REPRESENTATION • Oral or written statement made by the insured (or insurer) at the time of or prior to the issuance of the policy, relative to the risk to be insured, as to an existing or past fact or state of facts, or concerning a future happening, to give information to the insurer and otherwise, induce him to enter into the insurance contract Kinds of Representation AS to Form: • Oral • Written AS to time when representation may be made • At the time of issuing the policy • Before issuing the policy AS to NATURE • Affirmative – any allegation as to the existence or non-existence of fact when the contract begins • Promissory- any promise to be fulfilled after the contract has come into existence or any statement concerning what is to happen during the existence of the insurance • Representation must be presumed to refer to the date on which the contract goes into effect • Thus, no false representation if it is true at the time the contract takes effect although false at the time it was made • There is false representation if it is true at the time it was made but false at the time the contract takes effect NOTE: statements promissory of conditions to exist subsequent to the completion of the contract may be conditions or warranties. They cannot be representations. • Representation, not being part of the contract may be withdrawn or altered before the contract actually takes effect but not afterwards since the insurer has already been led by the representation in assuming the risk contemplated in the contract • Representations are construed liberally in favor of the insured and are required to be only substantially true • Although false, representation of the expectation, intention, belief, opinion or judgement of the insured will not avoid the policy if there is no actual fraud in inducing the acceptance of the risk, or if it is accepted at a lower rate of premium. This is likewise the rule although the statement is material to the risk, if the statement is obviously of the foregoing character, since in such case, the insurer is not justified in relying upon such statement, but is obligated to make further inquiry. Xxxx (Philamcare vs CA) Information obtained from third persons Gen Rule: insured is given discretion to communicate to the insurer what he knows of a matter of which he has no personal knowledge. If the representation turns out to be false, he is not responsible therefor, provided he gives explanation that he does so on the info of others • Information obtained from others, if false, not responsible for false representation • Exception: when information proceeds from an agent of the insured, whose duty is, in the ordinary course of business, to communicate such info to his principal and it was possible for the agent under such circumstances in the exercise of due diligence to have made such communication before making of the contract, the insured will be liable for the truth Note: where the insured merely signed the application form and made the agent of the insurer file the same for her, the insured made the agent of the insurer as her own agent FALSE REPRESENTATION: REQUISITES • Insured stated a fact which is untrue • With knowledge that it is untrue and with intent to deceive or which he states positively as true without knowing it to be true and which has a tendency to mislead • Such fact in either case is material to the risk REPRESENTION: ORDINARY VS MARINE INSURANCE ORDINARY MARINE Representations are Substantial truth of a not required to be representation is not literally true; they sufficient need only be substantially true REPRESENTION: ORDINARY VS MARINE INSURANCE ORDINARY MARINE In order to avoid a Insured is required policy, a to state the exact representation relied and whole truth in upon must be false relation to all matter in a substantial or that he represents, material respect or upon inquiry discloses or assumes to disclose EFFECT OF MISREPRESENTATION • Injured party is entitled to rescind the contract from the time the representation becomes false • The 2nd sentence of sec. 45 re: waiver of right to rescind of the insurer upon acceptance of premium payments despite discovery of fraud has been dleted by RA 10607 CHARACTERISTICS OF MISREPRESENTATION • Refers to date the contract goes into effect • May be altered or withdrawn before the insurance is effected but not afterwards • Made at the time of, or before issuing the policy and not after except if insured wants the insurer to make a modification of the policy • Oral or written • Not a part of the contract but merely a collateral inducement Concealment vs Misrepresentation • In concealment, insured withholds info of material facts from insurer while in misrepresentation, insured makes erroneous statements of facts with the intent of inducing the insurer to enter into the insurance contract • Same rules apply to determine materiality • In both, gives insurer the right to rescind the contract, intentional or not WARRANTY • Statement or promise by the insured (or insurer) contained in the policy itself or incorporated in or attached to it by proper reference, the falsity or non-fulfilment of which and regardless of whether or not the insurer has suffered loss or prejudice as a result of the falsity or non-fulfilment, renders the policy voidable at the election of the insurer. • May relate to the past, present and future or any or all of these PURPOSE: To eliminate potentially increasing hazards which may either be due to the acts of the insured or to the change of the condition of the property
REASON: insurer took into
consideration the condition of the property at the time of effectivity of the policy KINDS • EXPRESS- agreement expressed in a policy • IMPLIED- no express warranty is mentioned but necessarily embodied in the policy as a part thereof and which binds the insured as though expressed in the contract • Affirmative- one which asserts the existence of a fact or condition at the time it is made. The warranty is continuing if it is one that must be satisfied during the entire coverage of the insurance • Promissory- one where the insured stipulates that certain facts or conditions pertaining to the risk shall exist or that certain things with reference thereto shall be done or omitted • Promissory (ex. Seaworthiness of the vessel; non-deviation from the agreed voyage or non-indulgence in illegal ventures • NOTE: UNLESS the contrary intention appears, the courts will presume that the warranty is merely affirmative EFFECTS OF BREACH OF WARRANTY- IF MATERIAL • MATERIAL- violation of material warranty or of material provision of a policy will entitle the other party to rescind the contract; except if the performance becomes unlawful at the place of the contract; loss occurs before the time arrives for the performance of the warranty; and performance becomes impossible • NOTE: The right of the insurer to rescind exists even though the violation was not the direct cause of the loss Breach of warranty by insured • In order that the insurer may be entitled to rescind a contract of insurance on the ground of breach of warranty, fraud is not essential. Falsity, not fraud, is the basis of liability on warranty • Falsity not fraud is the basis of liability on a warranty • With fraud- policy is avoided ab initio; insured is not entitled to the return of premium paid • Without fraud- policy is avoided only from the time of breach; insured is entitled to return of premium pro rata if it occurs after inception of contract; return to all premiums if broken during the inception of the contract, in this case contract is void ab initio EFFECT OF BREACH OF WARRANTY- IF IMMATERIAL • IMMATERIAL – will not avoid the policy except if there is express provision to the contrary (ex. Other insurance clause violated, premium not paid, warranty clause violated, insured vehicle not a common carrier) Warranty vs Representation • Warranty is part of the contract while representation is a mere collateral inducement • Warranty is written on the policy or by reference; representation maybe written in the policy or may be oral • Warranty must be complied; representation requires only substantial truth and compliance • Warranty-falsity or non-fulfilment operates as breach of contract; representation -falsity on the ground of fraud renders policy void EXCEPTION/EXCLUSION • Provision in an insurance policy that indicates what is denied coverage • Insurer has the burden of proving that the loss comes within the purview of the exception or limitation CONDITION • An action that the insured must take, or continue to take, for the insurance policy to remain in force and the insurance company to process a claim • Non performance of which , although in form executed by the parties and delivered, does not spring the contract into life • Limitation to the attachment of the risk Kinds of Conditions 1. Condition precedent – calls for the happening of some event or the performance of some act after the terms of the contract have been agreed upon, before the contract shall be binding on the parties (i.e condition that the policy shall not take effect until the delivery and payment of the first premium during the good health of the applicant ) 2. Condition subsequent – pertains to the contract of insurance after the risk has attached and during the existence thereof (ex. Condition requiring notice and proof of loss in case of loss upon an insurance against fire) CONDITION WARRANTY Limitation to the Not a limitation to the attachment of risk attachment of risk Non-performance of Breach does not which, although in suspend or defeat the form executed by the operation of the parties and delivered, contract does not spring the contract into life Occurrence of breach Occurrence of breach temporarily renders the temporarily renders the entire contract entire contract voidable voidable • Breach of warranty or condition renders the contract voidable at the option of the insurer; but if he so elects, he may waive his privilege and power to rescind by the mere expression of an intention to do so. In that event his liability under the policy continues as before • If the policy contains a warranted statement that the insured building is occupied, the said statement is WARRANTY. • If the policy states that “this entire policy shall be void if the insured building be or becomes vacant or unoccupied and so remained for more than 10 days”, the statement is a CONDITION. • If the policy provides that “this company shall not be liable for any loss while the insured building is vacant or unoccupied”, this statement is an EXCEPTION RESCISSION; GROUNDS • Breach of material warranty • False representation • Breach of a condition subsequent • Alteration of the thing insured • Concealment INCONTESTABILITY CLAUSE • Precludes the insurer from raising the defense of false representations or concealment of material facts insofar as health and previous diseases are concerned if the issuance has been in force for at least 2 years during the insured’s lifetime (Tan vs CA) REQUISITES OF INCONTESTABILITY • Must be a life insurance policy • Must be payable on the death of the insured, and • It must be in force during the lifetime of the insured for at least two years from its date of issue or of its last reinstatement (may be shortened but it cannot be extended by stipulation) DEFENSES NOT BARRED BY INCONTESTABILITY CLAUSE • Beneficiary fails to furnish proof of death or to comply with any conditions imposed by the policy after the loss has happened • Premiums have not been paid • Cause of death of insured is an excepted risk • Person taking the insurance lacks insurable interest, • Etc…. POLICY OF INSURANCE • Written instrument in which a contract of insurance is set forth • Not necessary for the perfection of the contract, it being consensual in nature • Written instrument evidencing the contract of insurance • Cannot be issued or delivered unless in the form previously approved by the insurance commission Contents of POlicy • Rate of premium • Risk insured against • Amount of insurance except open or running policies • Parties • Property or life insured • Interest of the insured in the property of which he is not the absolute owner • Duration of the insurance KINDS OF INSURANCE POLICY • OPEN POLICY- the value of the thing insured is not agreed upon and the amount of the insurance merely represents the insurer’s maximum liability; value of such thing shall be determined at the time of the loss • VALUED POLICY- expresses on its face agreement that the thing insured shall be valued at a specified sum • RUNNING POLICY – contemplates successive insurances and which provides that the object of the policy may be from time to time defined, especially as to the subjects of insurance, by additional statements or endorsements • Delivery of policy(actual or constructive), is important because it is evidence of the making of a contract and of its terms; it is communication of the insurer’s acceptance of the insured’s offer; and it may affect the term of the coverage PAPERS ATTACHED TO THE POLICY • WARRANTY • RIDER – attachment that modifies the condition of the policy by expanding or restricting its benefits or excluding certain conditions from coverage; prevails over the agreement in the policy • ENDORSEMENT – any provision added to an insurance contract altering its scope or application • CLAUSE – agreement between parties on certain matters relating to the liability of the insurer in case of loss • No rider, clause, warranty, or endorsement shall be attached to, printed or stamped upon such policy, certificate or contract unless the Form of such application, rider, etc, has been approved by the Commissioner • Rider, clause, etc is attached to the policy • If not applied for by the insured or owner, the rider, clause, etc shall be countersigned by the insured • The descriptive title or name of the rider, et is mentioned and written on the blank spaces provided in the original printed policy form • Rider, etc pasted or attached to the policy is considered part of the policy or contract of insurance COVER NOTE • A concise and temporary written contract issued by the insurer through its duly authorized agent embodying the principal terms of an expected policy of insurance • Intended to give temporary written contract issued by the insurer through its agent embodying the principal terms of an expected policy of insurance • Valid for 60 days after which the policy must be issued • Period may be extended or renewed beyond 60 days with written approval of the commissioner • Not treated as separate policies but should be integrated to the regular policies subsequently issued so that the premiums on regular policies include the consideration for the cover note CANCELLATION OF NON-LIFE POLICY Insurer has the right to cancel a policy (unilateral) of insurance other than life- Grounds are, • Policy would violate the Insurance code • Conviction of a crime out of acts increasing the hazard insured against • Willful and reckless acts or omissions increasing the risk insured against • Physical changes in the property insured making it uninsurable • Discovery of other insurance coverage that makes the total insurance in excess of the value of the property insured • Non-payment of premiums • Fraud or material misrepresentation PREMIUM • Agreed price for assuming and carrying the risk, i.e the consideration paid to an insurer for undertaking to indemnify the insured against a specified peril • No insurance policy issued or renewal is valid and binding until actual payment of the premium. Any agreement to the contrary is void (Cash and Carry Rule) EFFECTS OF NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM • First Premium- prevents the contract from becoming binding notwithstanding the acceptance of the application or the issuance of the policy unless waived • Subsequent premium – does not affect the validity of the contract unless, by express stipulation, it is provided that the policy shall in that event be suspended or shall lapse • Non-payment of the balance of the premium due does not produce the cancellation of the contract Defenses available for Non-Payment • Fortuitous event • Condition, conduct or default of insurer • Payment of premium by check- insurer is liable –payment was honored and official receipt was issued 4 days after the fire. Any insurance company which delivers a policy or contract of insurance to an insurance agent shall be deemed to have authorized the latter to receive on its behalf payment of any premium xxxx It is bound by agent’s akcnowledgment of receipt of payment (Sec. 306). An acknowledgment in a policy of the receipt of premium is conclusive evidence of its payment, so far as to make the policy binding, notwithstanding any stipulation therein that it shall not be binding until the premium is actually paid (Sec 78)(American Home vs Chua) • Payments of Premium through Agent; Effect The insurance company is liable for damages to the insured for having cancelled the policy for alleged failure to pay the premium, when in fact premium had been paid to the agent of insurer who failed to remit the same xxxxxxx even if policy was reinstated later (Areola vs CA) Non payment of premium • Non payment of premium does not merely suspend but puts an end to an insurance contract since time of payment is peculiarly of the essence of the contract (Valenzuela v CA) • Partial payment of premium would not make the insurance coverage effective (Tibay vs CA) • Payment of premium is a condition precedent to and essential for, the efficaciousness of the insurance contract xxx exceptions 1. Life or industrial (health) insurance when a grace period applies 2. When insurer makes a written acknowledgment of receipt of premium --- conclusive evidence of premium payment (Southsea vs CA) Other admitted exceptions • Government employees pay their insurance premiums through salary deductions • Parties agreed payment of premiums by instalment and partial payment has been made at the time of the loss (Makati v CA) • There is agreement to grant the insured credit extension and the loss occurs before the expiration of the credit term (UCPB v Masagana) RETURN OF PREMIUMS TO INSURED • Contract is voidable due to fraud or misrepresentation of the insurer or his agents (sec 82) • Recession is granted due to the insurer’s breach of contract (Sec 74) • If the thing insured was never exposed to the risks insured against (Sec 80) • Contract is voidable because of facts which the insured was ignorant without his fault (Sec82) • Insurer never incurred liability (sec 82) • Insurance is void because it is illegal and the parties in pari delicto PRO-RATA RETURN TO INSURED • Insurance is for a definite period and the insured surrenders his policy before the termination thereof • When there is over insurance DEVICES IN LIFE INSURANCE • Cash surrender value – the amount the insurer agrees to pay to the holder of the policy if he surrenders it and releases his claim upon it • Paid Up Insurance – no more payments are required and consist of insurance for life in such an amount as the sum available therefore, considered as a single and final premium xxx • Automatic loan clause – stipulation in the policy providing that upon default in payment of premium, the same shall be paid from the loan value of the policy until that value is consumed • Grace Period – after payment of first premium, insured is entitled to a grace period of thirty days within which to pay the succeeding premiums • Reinstatement – provision that the holder of the policy shall be entitled to reinstatement of the contract at any time within three years from the date of default in the payment of the premium unless LOSS • Injury, damage or liability sustained by the insured in consequence of the happening of one or more of the perils against which the insurer, in consideration of the premium, has undertaken to indemnify the insured. Loss is satisfied by • Payment of loss • Reinstatement (repair or restoration) of the property lost or damaged • Replacement (substitution) with another or similar property Requisites of recovery in case of LOSS
• Interest must be properly covered by the
policy • There must be a loss • Insured must have insurable interest in the subject matter • Loss must be proximately caused by the peril When insurer is liable for loss • Proximate cause is the peril insured against • Loss caused by a peril not insured against to which the thing insured was exposed in the course of rescuing the same from the peril insured against • Loss caused by efforts to rescue the thing insured from a peril insured against When insurer is liable for loss • Loss the immediate cause of which is the peril insured against except where proximate cause is an excepted peril • Loss through the negligence of the insured except where there was gross negligence amounting to willful act REASON: One of the purposes for taking out insurance is to protect the insured against the consequence of his own negligence and that of his agents. Hence carelessness and negligence of the insured or his agents is not a defense on the part of the insurer (FGU Insurance v CA) When INSURER is NOT Liable • Loss by the insured’s willful act or gross negligence • Loss due to the connivance of the insured (insurer is not liable for a loss caused by intentional act of the insured or through his connivance. Such loss is not within the contemplation of a contract of insurance because one of the requisites of which is that the risk should not be subject to the control of the parties When INSURER is NOT Liable • Loss where the excepted peril is the proximate cause Proximate cause • That which in a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any new independent cause, produces an event and without which the event would not have occured Immediate cause • Final act in a series of provocations leading to a particular result or event, directly producing such result without the intervention of any further provocation Burden of proof • An except risk constitutes a defense by the insurer because it has not assumed that risk. The insurer has the burden of proving that the loss comes within the exception Notice of Loss • Formal notice given by the insured or claimant under a policy after the occurrence of the policy insured against Purposes of Notice • To be able to take such actions as may be necessary to protect its interest from fraud or imposition • To apprise the insurance co with the occurrence of the loss • In case of property insurance, to prevent further loss to the property NOTE: Insurer cannot be held liable to pay a claim unless he receives notice of that claim. Under the law, if notice of loss is not given to insurer by the person insured or by the person entitled to the benefit of insurance without unnecessary delay, or in a timely manner, the insurer is exonerated or discharged from liability even though the loss is one the policy was designed to protect against TIME OF GIVING NOTICE • Must be given without unnecessary delay or within a reasonable time • Note: formal notice of loss is not necessary if the insurer already has actual notice. PROOF OF LOSS • Formal evidence given to the company by the insured or claimant under a policy of the occurrence of the loss, the particulars thereof and the data necessary to enable the company to determine its liability and the amount thereof • When a preliminary proof of loss is required by a policy, the insured is not bound to give such proof as would be necessary in a court of justice, but it is sufficient for him to give the best evidence which he has in his power at that time NOTE: In case of loss upon an insurance against fire, an insurer is exonerated , if written notice thereof be not given to him by an insured, or some person entitled to the benefit of the insurance, without unnecessary delay Purposes • To afford the insurer a means of detecting any fraud that may have been practiced upon him • To give the insurer information by which he may determine the extent of his liability • To operate as a check upon extravagant claims When delay in presentation of notice or proof of loss is deemed waived • If delay is caused by any act of the insurer • By failure to take objection promptly and specifically upon that ground Defects in the Notice of Proof of Loss are waived when the insurer • Joins in the proceedings for determining the amount of the loss by arbitration, making no objections on account of notice and preliminary proof • Writes to the insured that he considers the policy null and void as the furnishing of notice or proof of loss would be useless Defects in the Notice of Proof of Loss are waived when the insurer • Makes objection on any ground other than formal defect in the preliminary proof • Recognizes his ability to pay the claim, or • Denies all liability under the policy Test to determine whether the third person may directly sue the insurer of the wrongdoer • Where the contract provides for indemnity against liability to third persons, then the latter to whom the insured is liable, can directly sue the insurer • Where the insurance is for indemnity against actual loss or payment, then third persons cannot proceed against the insurer, the contract being solely to reimburse the insured for liability actually discharged by him through payment to third persons, said third person’s recourse being, thus limited to the insured alone
1.) KAPATIRAN NG MGA NAGLILINGKOD SA PAMAHALAAN NG PILIPINAS, INC., HERMINIGILDO C. DUMLAO, GERONIMO Q. QUADRA, and MARIO C. VILLANUEVA v. HON. BIENVENIDO TAN G.R. No. 81311G.R. No. 81311
Philippine Refining Company (Now Known As "Unilever Philippines (PRC), Inc."), Petitioner, vs. Court of Appeals, Court of Tax Appeals, and The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 118794