Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2
Why this project has been taken ?
Almost in all thermal power plants fly ash is
produced as a by product, but some amount of fly
ash is used in cement industry for manufacturing
cement (PPC)and remaining is a waste.
In spite of this we are facing huge disposal
problems. In order to overcome this disposal
problem this residual fly ash can be effectively
used in a construction industry.
To improve the tensile strength of the concrete.
3
Abstract
This project deals with the effects of addition of various
proportions of steel fibres, flyash on the properties of strength of
concrete. An experimental study was carried out to explore its
effects on compressive strength and split tensile strength a under
different days of curing condition. The main aim of this
investigation is to study the effect of steel fibre mix by varying
content such as 1.0%, 2.0%, and 3.0% and Flyash of 10%, 15%
and 20% finding the optimum steel fibre content and fly ash
content.
4
INTRODUCTION
Many different technologies are being built all over the world,
6
Comparision of chemical composition
between cement and flyash.
CEMENT FLYASH
Oxides (%) Oxides (%)
CaO 65 CaO 3.04
SiO2 23 SiO2 50.41
Al2O3 6 Al2O3 30.66
Fe2O3 3 Fe2O3 3.34
MgO 1.5 MgO 0.93
7 Alkalis 1.5 Alkalis 3.07
LITERATURE REVIEW
8
Contd..
Name of the
SL. NO. Journal title year of publish Related points
author
9
Contd..
SL. Name of the Journal title and year of
Related points
NO. author publish
10
Summary of literature review.
11
Objectives and Scope of the study
The objective of the present work is to investigate
experimentally various properties of flyash based Steel
Fibre Reinforced Concrete (SFRC) for structural
applications.
To develop SFRC that can overcome the draw backs like
brittleness, multiple cracking under crushing loads.
The behaviour of FRC by Steel Fibre.
12
Contd..
The Physical properties of SFRC.
14
Contd..
Coarse Aggregates: The coarse aggregate used in this
Properties Values
Standard Consistency(%) 30
18
Properties of Coarse Aggregate
Properties Values
19
Properties of Fine Aggregate
Properties Results
Gradation Zone – II
20
Properties of Flyash
Properties Values
Ph 11.00
Specific
gravity 2.13
21
22
1. PROPERTIES OF FRESH
CONCRETE
•SLUMP TEST
2. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF
SFRC
•COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
•SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH
23
SLUMP TEST
0.40 50mm
0.45 80mm
0.50 140mm
0.55 170mm
24
SLUMP TEST FOR FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
% of % of Slump
SL NO
Fiber Flyash mm
1 1 10 100
2 2 10 80
3 3 10 10
1 1 15 100
2 2 15 60
3 3 15 15
1 1 20 120
2 2 20 60
3 3 20 10
25
Compressive Strength Test – Cube Specimen
Fly Ash Replacement-10%
Percentage of Failure Load 'P' Compressive
Curing Days
Fiber (kN) Strength (MPa)
7 630 28.00
1.0% 14 510 22.66
28 850 37.8
7 785 34.89
2.0% 14 800 35.56
28 875 38.8
7 520 23.56
3.0% 14 650 28.89
28 750 33.4
26
Compressive strength MPa
10% Flyash 15% Flyash
Compressive strength MPa
35
40
30
35
30 25
25 20
15 15% Flyash
20
10% Flyash
15 10
10 5
5 0
0 1 2 3 4
0
0 1 2 3 4 % of Fiber
% of Fiber
20% Flyash
35
Compressive strength MPa
30
25
20
15 20% Flyash
10
% of Fiber
27
40
40
Compressive strength MPa
30 30
25 25
10% Flyash 10% Flyash
20 20
15% Flyash 15% Flyash
15 20% Flyash 15 20% Flyash
10 10
5 5
0
0
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4
% of Fiber % of Fiber
28
Calculation of compressive strength
Fly Ash Replacement-15%
Percentage of Failure Load 'P' Compressive
Curing Days
Fiber (kN) Strength (MPa)
7 450 20
1.0% 14 500 22.22
28 565 25.11
7 675 30
2.0% 14 700 31.11
28 765 34
7 565 25.11
3.0% 14 590 26.22
28 690 30.67
29
Compressive strength MPa
Compressive strength MPa
10% Flyash
40
15% Flyash
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
10% Flyash 15 15% Flyash
15
10
10
5
5
0
0
0 1 2 3 4
0 1 2 3 4
% of Fiber % of Fiber
20% Flyash
Compressive strength MPa
40
35
30
25
20
20% Flyash
15
10
35
30
25
10% Flyash
20
15% Flyash
15
20% Flyash
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 40
30
25
10% Flyash
20
15% Flyash
15 20% Flyash
10
0
1 2 3
% of Fiber
31
Compressive strength Test
Fly Ash Replacement-20%
Percentage of Failure Load 'P' Compressive
Curing Days
Fiber (kN) Strength (MPa)
7 495 22
1.0% 14 520 23.11
28 545 24.22
7 745 33.11
2.0% 14 760 33.11
28 775 34.45
7 655 29.11
3.0% 14 660 29.33
28 675 30.00
32
Compressive strength MPa
Compressive strength MPa
10% Flyash
40
15% Flyash
40
39 35
38 30
25
37
20
15% Flyash
10% Flyash 15
36
10
35
5
34 0
0 1 2 3 4
33
0 1 2 3 4
% of Fiber
% of Fiber
20% Flyash
Compressive strength MPa
40
35
30
25
20
20% Flyash
15
10
5
28 Days Compressive Strength
0
0 1 2 3 4
33 % of Fiber
45
Compressive strength MPa
40
28 Days Compressive Strength
35
30
25 10% Flyash
20 15% Flyash
20% Flyash
15
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 45
% of Fiber
40
30
25 10% Flyash
20 15% Flyash
20% Flyash
15
10
0
1 2 3
34
% of Fiber
SL NO CURING PERIOD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (Mpa)
1 7 17.62 34.89
2 14 25.23 35.56
3 28 33.26 38.80
35
45
40
35
Compressive Strength (MPa)
30
25
CONVENTIONAL
CONCRETE
20
FRC WITH 2% FIbre & 10%
15 Flyash
10
0
7 14 28
7 290 4.10
2.0% 14 325 4.60
28 350 4.95
7 200 2.83
3.0% 14 215 3.04
28 250 3.54
38
Split Tensile strength MPa
% of Fiber % of Fiber
Split Tensile strength MPa
20% Flyash
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
20% Flyash
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 1 2 3 4
7 Days Split Tensile Streng
39
% of Fiber
7 Days Split Tensile Strength
4.5
Split Tensile strength MPa
4
3.5
2.5
10% Flyash
2 15% Flyash
1.5 20% Flyash
1
0.5
0
0 1 2 3 4
4.5
40
% of Fiber
Split Tensile strength- Cylinder Specimen
15% Flyash Replacement
Percentage of Failure Load 'P' Compressive
Curing Days
Fiber (kN) Strength (MPa)
7 200 2.83
1.0% 14 220 3.11
28 250 3.54
7 215 3.04
2.0% 14 245 3.47
28 275 3.89
7 175 2.48
3.0% 14 190 2.69
28 200 2.83
41
Split Tensile strength MPa
Split Tensile strength MPa
10% Flyash 15% Flyash
40
35
35
30
30
25
25 20
20 10% 15%
15
15 Flyash Flyash
10
10 5
5 0
0 1 2 3 4
0
0 1 2 3 4
% of Fiber
% of Fiber 20% Flyash
Split Tensile strength MPa
40
35
30
25
20
20% Flyash
15
10
5
0
0 1 2 3 4
35
30
25
10% Flyash
20
15% Flyash
15
20% Flyash
10
0
0 1 2 3 4
40
30
25
10% Flyash
20
15% Flyash
15 20% Flyash
10
0
1 2 3
43 % of Fiber
Split Tensile strength- Cylinder Specimen
20% Flyash Replacement
Percentage of Failure Load 'P' Compressive
Curing Days
Fiber (kN) Strength (MPa)
7 200 2.83
1.0% 14 230 3.25
28 250 3.54
7 255 3.61
2.0% 14 285 4.03
28 300 4.24
7 225 3.18
3.0% 14 250 3.54
28 275 3.89
44
10% Flyash 15% Flyash
Split Tensile strength MPa
% of Fiber % of Fiber
20% Flyash
Split Tensile strength MPa
4.3
4.2
4.1
4
3.9
20% Flyash
3.8
3.7
3.6
3.5
0 1 2 3 4
45 28 Days Split Tensile Strength
% of Fiber
6
28 Days Split Tensile Strength
Split Tensile strength MPa
10% Flyash
3
15% Flyash
20% Flyash
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 6
% of Fiber
10% Flyash
3
15% Flyash
20% Flyash
2
0
1 2 3
46 % of Fiber
SL NO CURING PERIOD SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH (Mpa)
1 7 1.96 4.1
2 14 2 4.6
3 28 3.54 4.95
47
6
5
Split Tensile Strength (MPa)
3 CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE
0
7 14 28
Curing Period (Days)
48
CONCLUSION
The compressive strength of SFRC for 2%fiber and 10% of
flyash is 38.8MPa.
The slump value of SFRC is found to be 80mm (true slump).
By comparing SFRC and conventional concrete the
compressive strength of SFRC is maximum at 2% fiber and
10% flyash.
The split tensile strength of SFRC at 2% of fiber and 10% of
fly ash is maximum compared to other percentages of fiber
and flyash and also the conventional concrete.
49
Contd..,
The slump value found to be 100mm for 1% of fiber
and 10% of flyash replacement.It shows very good
slump value when compared to other other percentage.
The slump value found to be 80mm for 2% of fiber
and 10% of flyash replacement.It shows considerable
slump value when compared to other other percentage.
The slump value found to be 10mm for 3% of fiber
and 10% of flyash replacement.It shows very less
slump value when compared to other other percentage.
50
SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK
The workability of the SFRC can be further increased by
adding superplasticizers.
This SFRC can be used in all the constructional activities
especially for the structures which has to withstand heavier
loads like Underground Constructional Elements,
Airport Runways , High Raised Buildings .
To avoid corrosion of steel fibres corrosive resistant
admixtures can be used.
The compressive strength of concrete can be improved by
taking higher grades of cement.
In future if geopolymer solution is used 100% of cement
can be replaced by flyash.
51
Mix Design.
As per IS 10262-2009 and IS 456-2000, the mix design of concrete is done
.the water cement ration of 0.45.
Mix design: M20 grade normal concrete
Proportioning Stipulations :
Designation of grade : M20
Cement used : OPC 53 grade
Max size of aggregate : 20mm
Min cement content : 320kg/m3
Max water/cement ratio : 0.45
Workability : 30-50 mm
Exposure condition : moderate
Max cement [OPC] content : 450kg/m3
Supervision : Good
Aggregate type : Crushed Angular
52
Test data for materials:
Cement used = OPC 53 grade
Specific gravity of cement = 3.06
Specific gravity of
Coarse aggregate = 2.56
Fine aggregate = 2.70
Water absorption
Coarse aggregate = 0.89%
Fine aggregate = 1.00%
Sieve analysis:
Coarse aggregate: : conforming to grading zone II of table 3 of IS
10262_2009
Fine aggregate: conforming to grading zone II of table 4 of IS 383.
53
Free moisture:
Coarse aggregate: nil
Fine aggregate: nil
Calculation of mix:
Volume of concrete = 1 m3
a)Weight of cement = (186/.45)
=413.33kg
b)Volume of water = 186/1 x 1/1000 = 0.186m3
55
c)Proportioning of Coarse Aggregate and Fine Aggregates
Fineness modulus of fine aggregates=2.73
volume of dry rounded coarse aggregates per unit volume of concrete=0.665 (sp 23)
mass of coarse aggregates = volume of Coarse aggregates x Bulk Density x1000
= 0.665x1.56x1000
=1037.4kg
e)Mass of fine aggregates
+ + + =1000
+ + + =1000
= 723.08 kg
Cement =372 Kg/m3
Water = 186 Kg/m3
Fine aggregates = 723.08Kg/m3
Coarse aggregates = 1037.4 Kg/m3
56Fly ash = 41.33 Kg/m3
References:
[1] E. Arunakanthi Experimental Studies On Fiber Reinforced Concrete
(FRC) International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)
Volume 7, Issue 5, September-October 2016
[2] Khadake S.N, Konapure C.G “An Experimental Study of Steel Fiber
Reinforced Concrete with Fly ash for M35 Grade”, International Journal of
Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 3, No. 1, Pp. 950-953, 2013.
59