Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Control ?
Why Process Control ?
■ Safe operation
■ To meet product specs
■ Achieve production targets
■ Optimization of inputs - Energy/ Power/ Raw Material
HOW ?
Maintain desired operating conditions, Minimize
process variance, Fight disturbances, Honor process
constraints
Elements of Process Control
Feedback Control
SET POINT
Controller Valve
error
MANIPULATED
VARIABLE
PROCESS
CONTROLLED
VARIABLE
Types of
Controller ?
Types of Controller ?
■ PID Controllers
■ Feed-forward Controller
■ Model Predictive Controller
■ APC
… Other Controllers
■ Feed-forward controller : Disturbance rejection
– Require model of Process, Disturbance
PID Valve
error
MANIPULATED
VARIABLE
PROCESS
CONTROLLED
VARIABLE
Limitations of PID Controller
■ Single Input - Single Output (S I S O)
■ Reactive strategy - cause & effect
■ Interactions not handled
■ Tuning difficult for process with delays
■ Not predictive
■ No constraint handling
■ Tuning impossible for unstable processes
Multivariable Control
SETPOINT
(Target)
APC
c1 m1
C PROCESS m2 M
c2
c3 G
m3
c4
C = G.M
APC and Optimiser
APC is the continuous and real time
implementation of Technological and
Operation know-how through the use of
sufficient computing power in dynamic plant
environment in order to maximize
profitability
The objective of Optimiser is
-to generate operating targets which maximize
profits within all relevant constraints
Why A P C ...
MV
DV
Reference Trajectory
Past Future
setpoint
CV
Prediction horizon
MV
Control horizon
APC pushes to Optimal
Constraints
Compressor
Speed Optimal
Constrained
Operation
Pressure
Typical Column
DP
Operating
Region
Temperature Motor
Amps
Qualities
APC solution
■ Operator Limits + Current Values +
Models ==> best combination of MV
setpoint changes
■ Objective function : Minimization of sum
of the square of errors
■ Uses an LP or SQP to find the best
solution
Benefits of APC
■ Maximize profit margin
– Throughput increase
– Increased yields of value added products
– Energy savings
– Improved and consistent product quality
■ Improved Stability
■ Smooth and consistent operation /Enhanced disturbance
rejection /Reduced variation in key parameters
Is like the best operator controlling the process at every instant
Multivariable Control
Benefits
Suppress (minimize) process variances enabling
the “pushing” of constraints
Specification
or Limit
Average
Average
FOXAPI
Nodebus
Real-Time Optimization
■ At 520,000 Barrels/Day =
$10.9million to $23.6million per
year. ==> 50 to 100 Cr/yr
1997/11/1 0:00
1997/11/3 0:00
1997/11/5 0:00
1997/11/7 0:00
1997/11/9 0:00
1997/11/11 0:00
1997/11/13 0:00
1997/11/15 0:00
1997/11/17 0:00
Pre- Commissioning
1997/11/19 0:00
Regenarator Pressure(P103)
1997/11/21 0:00
1997/11/23 0:00
1997/11/25 0:00
1997/11/27 0:00
1997/11/29 0:00
1997/12/1 0:00
1997/12/3 0:00
1997/12/5 0:00
1997/12/7 0:00
1997/12/9 0:00
1997/12/11 0:00
1997/12/13 0:00
1997/12/15 0:00
1997/12/17 0:00
1997/12/19 0:00
1997/12/21 0:00
1997/12/23 0:00
Post Commissioning
1997/12/25 0:00
1997/12/27 0:00
1997/12/29 0:00
1997/12/31 0:00
1998/1/2 0:00
before and after APC
1998/1/4 0:00
1998/1/6 0:00
1998/1/8 0:00
Mainfractionator Delta Pressure
1998/1/10 0:00
1998/1/12 0:00
P103 Average 2.467
1998/1/14 0:00
1998/1/16 0:00
Standard Deviation 0.00482
iT101DP)
T101DP.PV
Operator Workload (example)
Process (DCS)
Dynamic Model of a Column
Overhead
Drum
Level
DP
Top
Comp.
Bottom
Comp.
Linear Programming (LP)
CW
AI
Feed
Steam
AI
Bottom product
Linear Programming (LP)
steam flow
low limit max bottoms
max min
impurity
overhead
impurity
hi
gh max
MV2 - dP overhead
Reflux
Flow
impurity
Feasible
Region
min
reflux low limit
min
reflux low limit