0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
42 visualizzazioni17 pagine
This chapter discusses the history and current state of juvenile corrections in the United States. It covers the evolution of the juvenile justice system from English antecedents to the modern system, including key Supreme Court cases that established due process rights for juveniles. The chapter also examines why juveniles are treated differently than adults in the criminal justice system and describes common dispositions for juvenile offenders.
This chapter discusses the history and current state of juvenile corrections in the United States. It covers the evolution of the juvenile justice system from English antecedents to the modern system, including key Supreme Court cases that established due process rights for juveniles. The chapter also examines why juveniles are treated differently than adults in the criminal justice system and describes common dispositions for juvenile offenders.
This chapter discusses the history and current state of juvenile corrections in the United States. It covers the evolution of the juvenile justice system from English antecedents to the modern system, including key Supreme Court cases that established due process rights for juveniles. The chapter also examines why juveniles are treated differently than adults in the criminal justice system and describes common dispositions for juvenile offenders.
Corrections for Juveniles The Problem of Youth Crime History of Juvenile Corrections Juvenile Corrections: English Antecedents Juvenile Corrections in the United States Why Treat juveniles and Adults Differently? Differences between Adults and juveniles, in Perspective The Problem of Serious Delinquency Sanctioning juvenile Offenders Overview of Juvenile Justice System Disposition of Juvenile Offenders
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
“parens patriae”
the “parent of the country”;
the role of the state as guardian and protector of all people (particularly juveniles) who are unable to protect themselves
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
Evolution of juvenile justice in America, 1600s - 2000
Juvenile Rights Crime
1960 - 1980 Control •In re Gault, 1967 1980 - 2007 •JJ & Del. Prev. Act, 1974 •victim emphasis deinstitutionalize status •punishment of offenders serious offenders •legalization of juv. law •waive serious cases
Juvenile Court Refuge Period Puritan Period
1899 - 1960 1824 - 1899 1646 - 1824 •Ill. Juv. Crt, 1899 •NY House of Refuge, •Mass. Stubborn •separate legal system for juv’s 1825 for delinquent & Child Law, 1646 •child as “legally dependent children •child as “evil” irresponsible” • child as “helpless”
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
Julian W. Mack
Julian W. Mack (1866-1943) One of
the foremost innovators in juvenile justice, Mack presided over Chicago’s juvenile court from 1904 to 1907. He believed that the proper work of the court depended on the judge, supported by probation officers, caseworkers, and psychologists. He sought as much as possible to avoid using reformatories and tried to bring the expertise of social service professionals to the courts. Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th hallmarks of juvenile court informality not hindered by legalities of “due process” judges ran sessions as conversations exploring needs of child individualization each child is unique and has unique circumstances, problems, and needs intervention aim not to punish, but to help child become law-abiding identify and solve problems; provide treatment
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
“delinquent”
a child who has committed an act
which, if committed by an adult, would be criminal
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
“neglected”
a child who is not receiving
proper care because of some action or inaction of his or her parents
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
“dependent”
a child who has no parent or
guardian or whose parents are unable to give proper care
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
“In Re: Gault”
watershed Supreme Court case
granting “essential” due process rights to juveniles facing adjudication by juvenile court notice hearing counsel cross-examination
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
why treat juveniles differently juveniles are young and may easily change more susceptible to treatment juveniles have a high rate of ‘desistance’ most never get in trouble again juveniles’ families important to their lives state acts in partnership w/ family to treat child juveniles are easily influenced by peers juvenile crime is a group phenomenon removed from the group, child will behave juveniles have little responsibility for others easier to get them to isolate & modify behavior
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
Female Offense proportion
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
Juvenile Delinquents in Public Custodial Facilities
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
Characteristics of Youth Who Belong to a Gang
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
% arrests involving juveniles by crime
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
high risk juvenile offenders factors of concern
persistent behavior problems in elementary
school years onset of delinquency, aggression, drug use between 6 & 11 antisocial parents antisocial peers, poor school attendance, impulsivity, weak social ties between 12-14 membership in delinquent gangs drug dealing
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8th
juvenile offender dispositions waiver (to adult court) diversion correctional programs detention juvenile probation working in the school intermediate sanctions juvenile community corrections juvenile incarceration juvenile aftercare