Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Demo Class
Rustam Hafizyar
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering,
Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Northern
Outline
Introduction
Purpose of Schedule Updating
Project Control Defined
Baseline Schedule
Information for Updating Schedules
Frequency of Updating
Effect of Adding or Deleting Activities on Logic
Example Solution
Reference
1
Project Schedule Updating
Introduction
Schedule updating is simply reflecting actual performance
information:
• Including time of occurrence, and
• Amount of work completed on the schedule
Activities that have started, and the actual start date, percent complete,
and remaining durations
Activities that are completed, and the actual completion date
The actual budget spending or resource consumption for each activity
Past information was divided into two categories: Current and past.
• Past represents information occurred prior to the previous update.
• Current information occurred between the last update and this update.
8
Project Schedule Updating
Future information.
It comprises any changes such as:
• Any activities that have been added, along with their information
• Any activities that have been deleted
• Activities that have changed in duration, logic, budget, resources, constraints
• Any change to the imposed finish date for the entire schedule
• Any schedule change, such as change in the cost or availability of resources, change
in calendar workdays,
9
Project Schedule Updating
Frequency of Updating
Based on Heldman (2018) describes the five step of frequency are:
Waiting too long to update a schedule may eliminate the effectiveness of updating as a
control tool. (being late in corrective action, create de-motivation on staff).
Having a long reporting period may encourage procrastinators to put off corrective
measures by using the logic "We'll do it later. There is plenty of time!
Conversely, a reporting period that is too short may be costly in terms of time
consumption and overhead and reporting costs.
10
Project Schedule Updating
Effect of Adding or Deleting Activities on Logic
An activity in a schedule is usually like a link in a chain; removing a link may disturb
the whole chain if it is not done properly. As shown in Figure 1 the activity disturb the
whole chain (Mubarak, 2015).
Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the scheduler review the logic before
making any change.
Adding a new activity usually has less potential for harming the logic than does
deleting an activity (Mubarak, 2015).
Figure-1: Effect of removing an activity from a schedule: removal of AS250 would disturb
the entire chain (Mubarak, 2015).
Example Solution 11
In example, 10 days after the project has started, you receive the following report:
Activities A and D are complete (actual start and finish dates are given). Activity B started
on day 5. Remaining duration = 2 days. Activity C started on day 2. Some problems were
encountered. Remaining duration = 4 days. The duration for activity F was adjusted to 8
days. Activity J has been canceled. The duration for the new activity P is 4 days. IPA= E. ISA
(immediately succeeding activity) = K.
Update the logic. Note: When we delete activity J, the schedule must verify
whether we should assign its predecessor to its successor. In other words, would
activity F become a predecessor to activity K.
THANKS FOR
YOUR ATTENTION