0%(2)Il 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (2 voti)
5K visualizzazioni34 pagine
The document discusses business policy and strategy, outlining key concepts such as:
- Strategy refers to top management's plans to achieve organizational goals, while policy provides rules to guide decisions.
- Strategic management involves analyzing opportunities/threats, strengths/weaknesses, and monitoring the external environment.
- There are differences between strategy and tactics - strategy sets long-term direction while tactics focus on short-term implementation.
- Approaches to identifying policies and strategies include top-down, bottom-up, and combinations of these. Strategic decisions should be rare, consequential, and set precedents for future actions.
The document discusses business policy and strategy, outlining key concepts such as:
- Strategy refers to top management's plans to achieve organizational goals, while policy provides rules to guide decisions.
- Strategic management involves analyzing opportunities/threats, strengths/weaknesses, and monitoring the external environment.
- There are differences between strategy and tactics - strategy sets long-term direction while tactics focus on short-term implementation.
- Approaches to identifying policies and strategies include top-down, bottom-up, and combinations of these. Strategic decisions should be rare, consequential, and set precedents for future actions.
The document discusses business policy and strategy, outlining key concepts such as:
- Strategy refers to top management's plans to achieve organizational goals, while policy provides rules to guide decisions.
- Strategic management involves analyzing opportunities/threats, strengths/weaknesses, and monitoring the external environment.
- There are differences between strategy and tactics - strategy sets long-term direction while tactics focus on short-term implementation.
- Approaches to identifying policies and strategies include top-down, bottom-up, and combinations of these. Strategic decisions should be rare, consequential, and set precedents for future actions.
Business Policy • The set of rules that guides the decisions and actions of the members of the organization • Provide fundamental framework for plans and basis for decision making • Usually set-forth by the top management Strategy • Referring to the top management’s plan to attain the outcomes consistent with the organization’s mission and goals. ( Wright, Kroll, and Parnell)
Three Vintage points
• Strategy Formulation • Strategy Implementation • Strategic Control Two Categories of Strategy • Intended- refers to original strategy that management plans and intends to implement
• Realized- refers to the actual and eventual
strategy that the management actually implements Thompson and Strickland (1999) • Strategy is a set of competitive moves and business approaches that management employs • It is the management’s game plan to achieve the following: a. Attract and please customer b. Stake out a market position c. Conduct operations d. Compete successfully Characteristics of Strategy • Strategy derives its relevance given from the existence competition in the business
• It is done on the presumption of the existence of
a negative scenario
• A decision about how to use available resources
to secure a major objective in the face of obstruction
• Strategy is traditionally meant to be a grand plan
Strategy vs. Policy
Business policies and strategies often collide
which creates conflicts resulting to various organizational problems. The following are situations where strategy and policy often collides:
a.) In many instances, business policies exist
amidst absence of business strategy and strategies may exist without establishes business policies. b.) If ever they exist, business policies are generally directional in nature and strategy is more operational in context.
c.) Business policies are often formal or written
and strategies may be informal and not necessarily written and often confidential. ORIGIN AND NATURE OF STRATEGY
Jeffrey Bracker of Georgia State University who
cited the term “strategy” said that it was mentioned in the old testament and largely treated as a semantic issue. He also cited that strategy came from the greek word “stratego” referring to a “general” which in turn traces its roots from the words “army” and “lead”. The term strategy has gained its popularity in the field of military science. EVOLUTION OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT From a relatively stable environment, the concept of strategy has now undergone into a more rapidly changing and competitive environment. The change in context of strategy was attributed to two significant factors namely: a.) The marked acceleration of the rate of change within the firms b.) The accelerated application of science and technology to the process of management Von Neuman and Morgenstern (1947) - First modern writers to relate the concept of strategy to the business with their theory of games Concept of Strategy - Set out a sense of direction to achieve an objective as well as some sort of rules need to be laid down for everyone to be guided upon, strategy as applied to business has been largely associated with business policy. Business Policy as a precursor of strategic management The Nature of Strategic Management
Strategic management takes into
consideration various external as well as internal factors and the environment in general as well as competitiveness and sustainability over the long-term period in the industry or sector it belongs. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DEFINED • Strategic Management is defined as referring to the entire process of strategic decision-making that relates to its environment, guides internal activities, and determines the long-term performance of the organization. (Stahl and Grigsby, 1992) • Strategic Management is a set of managerial decisions and actions that determine the long-run performance of a corporation. It includes environmental scanning (external and internal), strategy implementation, evaluation and control. (Wheelen and Hunger, 2004) Strategic Management is a framework that evolves around the idea of shaping the destiny of an organization. (Williamson, Jenkins, et.al., 2004) It is about: A. Putting an organization into a competitive position; B. Sustaining and improving that position by developing an acquisition of appropriate resources and by monitoring and responding to environmental changes; and C. Monitoring and responding to the demands of key stakeholders. Strategic management encompasses managing not only the stages or vantage points they have identified but also the earlier stage determining the mission and goals of an organization within the context of external and internal environment. (Wright, Kroll and Parnell, 1996)
They emphasized strategic management is a
continuous process. Series of steps in which top management should accomplish following tasks:
1. Analyse the opportunities and threats
2. Analyse the organization’s strengths and weaknesses 3. Formulate strategies 4. Implement strategies 5. Engage in strategic control activities to ensure that the organization’s goals are attained Benefits of Strategic Management 3 most highly rated benefits of strategic management according to Wheelen and Hunger (2004).
• Clearer sense of strategic vision for the firm
• Sharper focus on what is strategically important
• Improved understanding of a rapidly changing
environment Strategic Types Strategic type is a category of firms based on common strategic orientation and a combination of structure, culture and process consistent with strategy. Competing firms within a single industry can be categorized on the basis of their general strategic orientation into 4 types:
• Defenders – this type includes companies with
limited product line that focus in improving the efficiency of their existing operations. • Prospectors – this type of companies includes firms with fairly broad product lines that focus on product innovation and market opportunities.
• Analyzers– this type includes business
organizations that operate in at least two different product-market areas, one stable and one variable.
• Reactors – this type includes companies that
lack a consistent strategy-structure-culture relationship. Strategy vs. Tactics
a.) As to level of conduct
• Strategy- highest levels of management • Tactics- lower level of management b.) As to regularity • Strategy- continuous and irregular • Tactics- determined on a periodic cycle with fixed time schedule c.) As to subjective values • Strategy is heavily weighed with subjective values than tactics d.) As to range of alternatives • Strategy is far greater than tactics e.) As to uncertainty • Uncertainty is much greater in strategy than tactics f.) As to nature of problems • Strategy- generally unstructured and one of a kind • Tactics- structured and repetitive in nature g.) In terms of information needs • Strategy- requires large amount of information • Tactics- rely heavily on internally generated data h.) As to time horizon • Strategy- last for a long period of time • Tactics- covers short duration i.) As to reference • Strategy- Original • Tactics- formulated within and pursuit of strategies j.) As to the details • Strategy- broad and may have fewer details than tactics k.) As to the type of personnel involved • Strategy- top management • Tactics- managers and employees l.) As to the ease of evaluation • It is easier to measure the effectiveness in tactics than in strategy m.) As to the context point of view • Strategy- formulated from corporate viewpoint • Tactics- developed principally from a functional point of view. n.) As to its importance • Strategy- highest importance • Tactics- less significant Approaches to Identifying Policies and Strategies A. Policy/strategy profile B. Gap Analysis C. Competitive Strategy Analysis
developing policies and strategies come from the top management with rank and file tasked to implementing or following the policies and strategies b. Bottom-top approach – policy and strategy initiatives emanate from the bottom or rank-and- file from which top management develops concrete policies and strategies for the lower-ranked employees to observe or follow c. Top-bottom-top – policy and strategy initiatives are taken from the top management then filtered down to lower-ranked personnel for consultations then return back to the top management for refinements STRATEGIC DECISION a. Rare – Strategic decisions are unusual and typically have no precedent to follow. b. Consequential – Strategic decisions should commit substantial resources and demand a great deal of commitment from people at all levels. c. Directive – Strategic decisions set precedents for lesser decisions and future actions throughout the organization. MODALITIES IN STRATEGIC DECISION
a. Entrepreneurial mode – strategy is made
by one powerful individual and the focus is on opportunities; problems are secondary b. Adaptive mode – sometimes referred to as “muddling through,” characterized by reactive solutions to existing problems, rather than proactive search for new opportunities c. Planning mode – involves the systematic gathering of appropriate information for situation analysis, the generation of feasible alternative strategies, and the rational selection of the most appropriate strategy d. Logical mode – can be viewed as a synthesis of planning, adaptive, and, to a lesser extent, the entrepreneurial modes Strategic Decision-Making Process (Wheelen and Hunger, 2004)
Step 1: Evaluate current performance
Step 2: Review Corporate Governance Step 3: Scan and assess external environment Step 4: Scan and assess internal corporate environment Step 5: Analyze strategic factors to pinpoint problem areas Step 6: Generate, evaluate and select best alternatives Step 7: Implement selected strategies Step 8: Evaluate and implement strategies via feedback systems Role of the Board of Directors • The Board of Directors in so far are policy and strategy concerned.
• Specific roles: a. Monitor b. Evaluate and influence c. Initiate and determine
79 Fair Empl - Prac.cas. (Bna) 1446, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,771, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 540 Mashell C. Dees v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc., 168 F.3d 417, 11th Cir. (1999)