Sei sulla pagina 1di 11

Rachman Famie Darmawan

Rachman Famie Darmawan


1 The learning model does not
fit the material characteristics

BACKGROUND 2 The teacher does not


understand the learning
model

3
students do not reach the
minimum completeness
criteria 70
FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM

How to apply the CTL learning model to social science subjects


1

Is the application of CTL able to improve student learning outcomes in


2
social science subjects
BENEFITS OF RESEARCH

Students recognize new As study material in an effort to


1 3
learning methods that facilitate improve the learning process in school
them in learning activities

As input for the teacher in This research is a form of application


2 choosing the right method 4 and solutions offered to solve learning
problems
Relationship with Educational
Technology

Creating Managing
Processes +
Resource

Using

Facilitating Learning
+
Improving Performance

Januszewski and Molenda ( Definition and Terminology Committee of the


Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2008:5)
Definition of
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 2008

Molenda defines Education Technology consisting


of 3 regions, namely: Creation / creating,
utilization, and management. Then the
implementation of the CTL learning model if
associated with the definition of Molenda is
included in the creating area.
Contextual Teaching and Learning

CTL is a learning concept CTL can make students engage CTL is a learning process that
that helps teachers in meaningful activities that aims to educate students in
associate material taught are expected to help them be understanding meaningfully
with facts in student life. able to connect the associated with real-life
CTL places more knowledge gained in the contexts
emphasis on planning classroom to the context of (Nanang H, 2009:67)
classroom activities real life situations.
designed by the teacher. (Nurhadi, 2002:7)

1 2 3
1 Type experimental research

2 Research design
Use quasi experimental
design – pretest-posttest
control group

Research 3 E O1 X O2

Method K O3 O4

4
Subject research
Class VII A Eksperimen – Class
VII B Control

5
Method collection data
Test
Observation
• Teacher
Observation result
2 N=25-2=23 Significant 60% then obtained
1 • Teacher and Student
r table 0.256 r count 0.94 greater than r
An agreement betwen observers 1
table
dan 2
• Student
N=25-2=23 Significant 60% then obtained
r table 0.256 r count 0.83 greater than r
table

Research Result

the average value of pretest = 68.52 Based on the results of calculations


3 4
and the average posttest value = with a significant level of 5%, db =
80.24. So it can be concluded that the 25 - 1 = 24, so that it is obtained t
average posttest value is greater than table 2.797. So tcount is greater
the prestest average value. than t table which is 5.89> 2.06.
Conclusion

1 2

There is a much different effect learning model of Contextual


of learning outcomes Teaching Learning (CTL) influences
compared to using the old the increase in learning outcomes of
learning method and has been class VII students in social studies
proven in the observation and subjects
test tables.
THANK YOU

Potrebbero piacerti anche