0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
8 visualizzazioni10 pagine
Biotechnology and genetic engineering has become a site for democratic imagination in India. The reported effects of Bt cotton in India largely vary due to the extensive heterogeneity of the growing environment, pest pressures, farmer practices and social context. Farmers lack of information on growing conditions, use of pesticides the importance of planting proper seeds and the earnings to be expected from using this technology.
Biotechnology and genetic engineering has become a site for democratic imagination in India. The reported effects of Bt cotton in India largely vary due to the extensive heterogeneity of the growing environment, pest pressures, farmer practices and social context. Farmers lack of information on growing conditions, use of pesticides the importance of planting proper seeds and the earnings to be expected from using this technology.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PPT, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Biotechnology and genetic engineering has become a site for democratic imagination in India. The reported effects of Bt cotton in India largely vary due to the extensive heterogeneity of the growing environment, pest pressures, farmer practices and social context. Farmers lack of information on growing conditions, use of pesticides the importance of planting proper seeds and the earnings to be expected from using this technology.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PPT, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
accounts about 5 % of the global cropped area (2006)
ð 73% of World cotton area (35 million ha)
& 80 % of production (43 million MT)- concentrated in 6 countries- US, China, India, Pakistan, Brazil & Uzbekistan (FAO 2006) ð Monsanto seeds (Bt.Cotton-
Cotton-growing states in India ð Gujrat, Punjab, A.P, Maharashtra , M.P & Karnataka . ð A Quantum jump in productivity from 298 kg/ha during 1990s- 500 kg/ha after the wide scale adoption of cotton since 2002. ë
In states of Maharashtra & A.P. Farmer¶s anticipation (higher yields effects + drastic reduction in use of pesticides & Insecticides against Bollworm, sucking pests ) evidence from studies (2002-06) ± returns from Bt technology do not render higher net returns at farm level. j e debate around GM Seeds:
ð Social & Environmental
appropriateness of genetically engineered organisms ;
ð Introduction, diffusion &
performance of Bt cotton seeds in India. j e institutional context ð ùillegal´ Bt cotton seeds posits a paradoxical problem. ð biotechnology and genetic engineering has become a site for democratic imagination in India. ð The proponents and opponents debating ± situations that may entail social and environmental risk, impact on human health, eradication of hunger and poverty and monopolisation of scientific and technological knowledge. ï t e Controvers
ð Farmers lack of information on
growing conditions, use of pesticides ð the importance of planting proper seeds, and ð the earnings to be expected from using this technology ð The reported effects of Bt cotton in India largely vary due to the extensive heterogeneity of the growing environment, pest pressures, farmer practices & social context. r
ë
ð Social factors, external & yet constraining
on the individual, regulate human social actions and act as a constraint to human behavior. ð Indebtedness from repeated crop losses and a fall in social status due to loss of income and the inability to maintain the same level of expenditure are Characteristic indicators leading to Farmer¶s suicide. Causes of indebtedness
ð changes in cropping patterns, plant
resistance to pesticides and ð increased spending on pesticides, a shift from low-cost food crops to high-cost cash crops, lack of access to institutional credit, and ð a shift of government policy focus away from agriculture.