Group -7: Rahul Atodaria (20181007)

Vatsal Deladia (20181017)

Akanksha Mehrotra (20181027)
Hardik Patel (20181038)
Siddharth Shiyani (20181048)
 TOPICS TO BE COVERED

Trait Theory of Behavior Theory of Profile of Tomorrow’s

Leadership Leadership Leaders

1. Stogdill Framework 1. Michigan & Ohio 1. Internality

2. McCall & Lombardo 2. Blake Monton Managerial Grid 2. Creativity

Framework

3. Bennis & Thomas 3. Different Behavior of Leadership 3. humility

Framework
4. Values

5. Networking
What’s Leadership ?
According To Peter Drucker:
“The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers.”

Bill Gates:
“As we look ahead into the next century, leaders will be those who empower
others.”

Definition:
“Leadership is a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of
others, towards the achievement of a goal.”
TRAIT THEORY OF LEADERSHIP
• Successor of “Great Man” Theory of Leadership
• Big Assumption:
“ Leaders such as Abraham Lincoln or Mark Zuckerberg were born
with inborn ability to lead.”

What’s Trait Theory ?

• Leadership Traits are innate.(Big 5 Model Traits)
• Developed through Experience and Learning
• Focuses on Personal Qualities and Characteristics.
• Critics: “Too simplistic & futile.”
TRAIT THEORIES

1 2 3
• Emotional
• Adaptable to • Adaptive Capacity

McCall & Lombardo Traits

stability &

Bennis & Thomas Traits

situations
composure • Engaging others by
Stogdill’s Traits

• Assertive • Admitting Error creating shared

• Decisive • Good meaning
Interpersonal • Voice
• Dependable Skills
• Persistent • Intellectual • Integrity
• Energetic Breadth

• Self-confident
Indra Nooyi – CEO PepsiCo.
• Traits that make her a Great Leader:
• Sociable
• Agreeable
• Emotionally Stable
• Open to Experiences
• Conscientious
• Results of Such Personality Traits:
• Excellence in Job Performance
• Successful Career
• One of the most Powerful Women in Business
 Behavioral Theories

Theories that attempt to isolate behaviors that

differentiate effective leaders form ineffective leaders
Ohio State Studies(LBDQ)

Research began at Ohio state university in late 1940’s

To identify independent dimensions of leader behavior

Resulted in two dimensions:

• Initiating structure
• Consideration
Conclusions of Ohio State Studies

• Higher on one dimension does not mean low on another

• Followers of leaders high in consideration were more satisfied,

motivated and had respect for their leaders

• Leaders high in initiating structure increased organization’s

productivity and performance
Michigan Studies
Objective
To locate behavioral characteristics of leaders that appeared to be related
to measure of performance effectiveness

Came up with two-dimensions of leadership behavior

• Employee-oriented
• Production-oriented
Conclusions of Michigan Studies

• Employees favored leaders who were employee oriented in behavior

• Recommended only one dimension important for manager to be

successful i.e. employee oriented leaders
The Managerial Grid
• Developed by Blake and Mouton

• Based on “ concern for people “ and “ concern for production “

• Does not specify why a manger falls into one part or another grid
Kurt Lewin’s Three Dimensional Theory
& Other Leadership Styles
1. Autocratic Leadership
• Classical Leadership Style
• Managers retains as much power and
decision making authority as possible

• No involvement of Staff

Eg:- Adolf Hitler

2. Democratic Leadership
• Also known as Participative style
• Sharing of Decision-making abilities and Ideas
• Encourages staff to be a part of the decision making
Eg:- Carlos Ghosn- Currently the Chairman and CEO of Paris-based Renault, Chairman and CEO of
Japan-based Nissan, and Chairman of Russian automobile manufacturerAvtoVAZ
3. Supportive Leadership
• Path-goal theory

• Cohesion among members

• Attempts to reduce employee stress and frustration in the workplace

Eg:- Steve Jobs

4. Achievement Leadership
• A management strategy that puts high goals and training to get the needed improvementin
performance levels.

• high performance is expected

•a high level of confidence in the employee's ability to achieve the goals.

Eg:- Abdul Kalam

5. Laissez-Faire Leadership
• Known as “Hands-off” style

• The manager provide little or no direction

and gives staff freedom as much as possible

• Highly experienced and trained employees requiring little supervision fall under the laissez-faire

leadership style.

Eg:- Warren Buffet

Profile For Future Leaders
Internality Creativity Humility
1. Grand 1. Innovation 1. Modesty
2. Internal locus of Control 2. Maverick Mindset 2. Self- resistant
3. Optimism 3. Neoteny 3. Empowering
4. Professional 4. Culture Building

Values Networking
1. Value orientation 1. Networking Competence
2. Ethics 2. Communication
3. People first 3. Synergy building
4. Social concern 4. Customer orientation
Finding & Creating Effective Leaders
• Selection Process
-Extraversion, conscientiousness and openness to experience

• Training
- Developing situational-analysis
- Executive Leadership programs
THANK YOU