Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
o Grouping of identical activities in one department so that equipment, machines, processes and
expertise can be developed at one place under the guidance of one departmental head. If the
department grows unwieldy, then the identical organization of two or more departments can be
structured with formal reporting policy laid down.
o Coordination of various activities be laid down and coordinating authority specified.
o Individual, group and departmental goals should be laid down with specific time frame. Monitoring
of goals is essential.
o Seniority between the departmental heads is generally the point of organizational conflict hence
the lateral and vertical relationship with particular reference to seniority must be laid down in the
policy or the standing orders for the organization.
o Standing orders, policies, procedures, drills, rules and regulations should exit in an organization.
o These are required to be laid down in detail.
o Duties of each and every appointment reduces operating problems.
Introduction (contd.)
Forms of Organization Structure:
All managers must bear that there are two organizations they must deal with-one formal
and the other informal.
The formal organization in usually delineated by an organizational chart and job
descriptions. The official reporting relationships are clearly known to every manager.
Alongside the formal organization exists an informal organization which is a set of evolving
relationships and patterns of human interaction within an organization that are not officially
prescribed.
Formal organizational structures are categorized as:
i. Line organizational structure.
ii. Staff or functional authority organizational structure.
iii. Line and staff organizational structure.
Introduction (contd.)
Forms of Organization Structure (contd.)
iv. Committee organizational structure.
v. Divisional organizational structure.
vi. Project organizational structure.
vii. Matrix organizational structure and
viii. Hybrid organizational structure.
These organizational structures are briefly described in the following paragraphs:
1. Line Organizational Structure:
A line organization has only direct, vertical relationships between different levels in the firm.
There are only line departments-departments directly involved in accomplishing the primary goal of the
organization.
For example, in a typical firm, line departments include production and marketing. In a line organization
authority follows the chain of command.
Exhibit 10.3 illustrates a single line organizational structure.
Introduction (contd.)
Introduction (contd.)
Line Organizational Structure (contd.)
Features:
Has only direct vertical relationships between different levels in the firm.
Advantages:
1. Tends to simplify and clarify authority, responsibility and accountability relationships
2. Promotes fast decision making
3. Simple to understand
Disadvantages:
1. Neglects specialists in planning
2. Overloads key persons
Introduction (contd.)
While this type of organizational structure overcomes the disadvantages of a pure line
organizational structure, it has some major disadvantages: They are:
(i) the potential conflicts resulting from violation of principle of unity of command and
(ii) the tendency to keep authority centralized at higher levels in the organization.
3. Line and Staff Organizational Structure:
Most large organizations belong to this type of organizational structure.
These organizations have direct, vertical relationships between different levels and also
specialists responsible for advising and assisting line managers.
Staff departments provide line people with advice and assistance in specialized areas (for
example, quality control, advising production department).
Exhibit 10.5 illustrates the line and staff organizational chart.
Introduction (contd.)
7. Since authority relationships are overlapping with possibilities of conflicts, informal relationships between project
manager and departmental managers (functional managers) become more important than formal prescription of
authority.
8. Full and free communication is essential among those working on the project.
7. Matrix Organizational Structure:
Matrix organizational structures proposes two management structures in single organization: a functional structure,
which may be hierarchical and permanent and a project structure that lasts for the length of the project.
A matrix structure is, in a sense, a combination and interaction of project and functional structures and is suggested
to overcome the problems associated with project and functional structures individually.
It is a permanent organization designed to achieve specific results by using teams of specialists from different
functional areas in the organization.
Feature:
Superimposes a horizontal set of divisions and reporting relationships onto a hierarchical functional structure.
The matrix organization is illustrated in Exhibit 10.8.
Introduction (contd.)
Introduction (contd.)
The problem with this structure is the negative effects of dual authority similar to that of project
organization.
The functional managers may lose some of their authority because product managers are given
the budgets to purchase internal resources.
In a matrix organization, the product or business group managers and functional managers have
somewhat equal power.
There is possibility of conflict and frustration but the opportunity for prompt and efficient
accomplishment is quite high.
8. Hybrid Organizational Structure:
A hybrid organizational structure is an approach to designing the internal operating structure of a
company or other entity in a manner that makes use of several different organizational patterns,
rather than relying on one particular model.
A hybrid organization is a body that operates in both the public sector and the private sector,
simultaneously fulfilling public duties and developing commercial market activities.
Introduction (contd.)