Trisakti University

Magister Petroleum Engineering

Petrophysics Analysis of
Ghaida-01 Well

Done by

Panca Suci Widiantoro (171.141.009)

Content
 Objectives

 Methods

 Analytical Analysis

 Conclusions & Recommendations

Objectives

 Determine the quality and quantity of reservoir rock properties

(shale volume, porosity and water saturation) from log data with
analytical method
 Archie Equation
Empirical constant
(usually near unity) Resistivity of

a Rww formation water,

Sw  n
-m


Water
saturation,
m Cementation
exponent
fraction
Saturation
exponent
Rtt (usually near 2)

(also usually True formation

near 2) Porosity, resistivity, -m
fraction
 Workflow
Available Data AVAILABLE DATA

Log Derived Shale Volume Formation Factor

WIRELINE
Water Analysis and Resistivity
LOG
index data
Log Derived Porosity

Deep Reading Porosity

Formation Factor (a,m,n) Resistivity
(LLD) Formation
Assume Formation
is Limestone
Factor
Determining Resistivity Shallow Reading
Resistivity Resistivity
(MSFL) Index
Estimate Water Saturation (Sw)
GR SP
Reservoir Cut-Off
Neutron

Density
 Available Data
LOG

RESISTIVITY
SUMUR DENSITY
NEUTRO SONIC
GR SP CALIPER Rxo SHALLO (RHOB,
N (NPHI) (DT)
(MSFL, W DEEP RHOZ)
Rxoz) (LLS) (LLD)
Ghaida-01 V V V V V V V V
Assumption Data
T 80°F
BHT@1406
m 200 F
Rmf@T= 0.5Ωm
Rmc@T= 0.8Ωm

For Limestone Reservoir a,m and n value are follow:

a m n
1 2 2
Analytical Method
a, m, n (Assumption using limestone value)
 Using Plot Analysis:
 a, m value: based on graphic formation factor vs porosity
 n value value: based on graphic resitivity Index vs water saturation

Rw using SP, Archie and Pickett Plot

Vclay using GR and SP

Porosity using Neuton-density log

Sw using Archie, Simandoux, Dual water, Waxman &

smith and Indonesia formula
 Choose the depth to be analyzed
 Collect all input data
 Calculate Sw using Archie, Simandoux, Dual water, Waxman & smith and
Indonesia Formula
Interval Reservoir & Fluid Content (Qualitative analysis/quick look)

Reservoir Top Bottom

A 1,300 1,320
B 1,323 1,339
C 1,342 1,354
D 1,356 1,371
A
E 1,372 1,377
F 1,385 1,396
G 1,397 1,407

B
Possible GWC Fluid
Reservoir
Content
C A Gas
B Gas
C water
D water
D E water
F Oil
G water
E

F Possible OWC

G
Analysis Data and Result (Vcl calculation from GR & SP)
Limestone
base line
24.5 API 0.2

C
Shale base
D line
110 API SP log relatively give V clay higher than
E GR log

G
Analysis Data and Result ( Porosity)
Determine Rw (SP method)
Determine SP at water zone

Read Rmfeq/Rweq at chart SP 1

Determine Rweq

Read Rw at chart SP 2
Determine Rw (SP method)….

Rw = 0.16 ohm-m
Determine Rw (Pickett Plot)

Rw = 0.3 ohm-m

Plot poro Rt vs Poro eff

Determine Rw (Archie)

Water bearing zone

Analysis Data and Result ( Porosity)
Porosity N-D
 Porosity N-D

All zone relatively have similar porosity effective value because all zone has
similar lithology and relatively clean formation .
ANALYSIS AND RESULT

WATER SATURATION

ARCHIE SIMANDOUX Dual water

Where :

ARCHIE a = tortuosity factor (between 0.6-2.0

based on lithogy) , unitless

m = cementation factor (between 1.0-3.0), unitless

n = saturation exponent (between 1.2-2.2), unitless

Dual Water c = constanta (0.4 for sandstone and 0.45

for carbonate & limestone), unitless

Øe = effective porosity, fraction

Rw = water formation resistivity, ohm-m

Rt = formation resistivity, ohm-m

SIMANDOUX
Rsh = shale resistivity, ohm-m

Vsh = shale volume, fraction

Sw = water saturation, fraction

ANALYSIS AND RESULT….

WATER SATURATION
Waxman-
Indonesian
smith
Where :
Waxman
-smith a = tortuosity factor (between 0.6-2.0

based on lithogy) , unitless

m = cementation factor (between 1.0-3.0), unitless

n = saturation exponent (between 1.2-2.2), unitless

c = constanta (0.4 for sandstone and 0.45

for carbonate & limestone), unitless

Øe = effective porosity, fraction

INDONESIA
Rw = water formation resistivity, ohm-m

Rt = formation resistivity, ohm-m

Rsh = shale resistivity, ohm-m

Vsh = shale volume, fraction

Sw = water saturation, fraction

Comparison Volume shale, Effective porosity and Sw value for Potential zone

Based on the comparison above dual water method give the higher value than the
other method due to dual water method consider additional conductivity and
character of fluid (salinity).
Archie, simadoux, waxman-smith and Indonesia relatively have the similar value,
due to the formation/ zone (zone A,B and F) is clean formation.
Based on The Sw Analysis OWC is appear in limestone F at depth of 1390 m
Analysis Data and Result ( Hidrocarbon initially In-Place)
Conclusions
 Based on Petrophysic analysis (Qualitative and
Quantitative) shows zone A,B and F have a good
reservoir quality and potentially Hydrocarbon bearing
zone.
 There are two system reservoir Gas-water system (zone
A,B,C,D &E) and Oil-water system (zone F and G).
Possible Gas water contact is at depth of 1340 m, and
Oil water contact at depth of 1390 m.
 Archie, simadoux, waxman-smith and Indonesia
relatively have the similar value, due to the formation/
zone (zone A,B and F) is clean formation.
 Ghaida-01 well have potential to produce Gas and oil
with total Gas inplace 528 -717 Mscf/Acre and Oil
Inplace 11000-13800 Bbls/Acre
Recommendation
 Need to run DST and or conduct production testing to
confirm deliverability of Ghaida-01 well