Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
QUALITY
GOVERNANCE
1
SPED (Non-
SPED (Graded) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
Graded)
Male 58 47 51 61 66 56 54
Female 1 70 53 49 47 47 57 57
Male Female
64 65
58
56 56
53 53 53 54
50 51
45 45 44
1
SPED (Non- K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
Graded)
AVERAGE
83.83
84 82.05 82.17
82 80.7 81.02
80.14
79.39 79.63
80
77.27
78
76
74
72
COMPARATIVE RESULTS OF MPS
2.60%
AVE. MPS QUARTERLY TEST increase
4th Quarter
AVERAGE
84 1st Quarter
83.83
82.5
84
81.62
82 81.1 83 82.05 82.17
80.46 82 81.02
79.83 80.7
80 81 80.14
79.03 79.63
78.66 80 79.39
79
78
76.6 78 77.27
77
76 76
74.67
75
74 74
73
72
70
QUARTERLY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PER SUBJECT
AREA TOP 3 & BOTTOM 3
TOP 3 BOTTOM 3
84 83.83 80
79.63
79.5
83.5 79.39
79
83
78.5
82.5 78
82.17
82.05 77.5 77.29
82
77
81.5
76.5
81 76
ESP MAPEH FILIPINO Science MATH T.L.E
NO. OF PUPILS PER GRADE LEVEL WITH
MOVING TOWARDS MASTERY LEVEL)
English 42 43 54 60 64 57 320
Filipino 31 41 52 50 49 59 272
Mathematics 48 36 55 71 64 35 309
Science 51 40 52 56 199
A.P 29 41 51 52 57 35 265
ESP 28 36 35 55 43 24 221
MAPEH 19 34 45 43 46 30 217
No. of Teachers trained on K to 12 Implementation No. of Teachers Attended LAC Session
No. of Teachers Attended INSET No. of Teachers Attended Other Trainings
5 5
4 4 4
3 3
SPED/K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
No. of Teachers trained on K to 12
Implementation
No. of Teachers Attended LAC Session 3 4 3 4 4 5 5
No. of Teachers Attended INSET
No. of Teachers Attended Other Trainings
P GRADE
LEVEL
MPS GAP CUMULATIVE
A
PERCENTAGE
(%)
A 4 72 27 72 45% N
R 5 75 24 147 92% A
E 3 79 20 154 96% L
T 6 80 19 159 100% Y
O
S
(Mean Percentage Score of Science in
Grade 3 - 6 Classes)
I
S
SCIENCE SUBJECT
GRADE MPS MPS
LEVEL
80
4 72
6
3 79
5 75
5 75
3 79
4 72
6 80
65 70 75 80 85
SEGMENTATION
Lack of
Learning Delayed distribution of
Materials and learners’ materials
Teaching and teaching guides
Based from the MPS per guides
grade level, Grade Four
got the lowest MPS of
72.94% due to late Lack of
presentation of the Teachers
subject in the primary Training in the
level. In addition, it was
particular Lack of Training
found out that lack of
subject Area opportunities
learners materials and
lack of training
opportunities for
teachers who are
handling science Late
subjects are considered presentation
reasons for having such
low MPS.
of the
subject in Pupils are not familiar
with the subject (science)
the primary
levels.
Strengths Weaknesses
1. No least learned competencies
Internal
in this quarter.
Assessment 1. Lack of T-L facilities to
2. Presence of School Internet
enhance the school based
Connectivity.
programs and projects
3. Availability of E- classroom
equipped with computers and
2. Pupils engaged in video
interactive projector to be
games, gadgets and tablets.
External used by the learners
Assessment 4. A child friendly school
Opportunities
1. Presence of potential donors and
benefactors
2. LGU’s provision of financial
assistance (SEF)
3. Newly renovated/ repaired
classrooms to ensure quality
education for our clients – the
Rosario Central Elementary
School Learners.
Threats
1. Natural Calamities
STRATEGIC OPTION
Strength
• Adopt-a-Learner Program
• Value Oriented Parent Education
• No least learned competencies in this quarter.
• Presence of School Internet Connectivity.
• Availability of E- classroom equipped with computers and
interactive projector to be used by the learners
• A child friendly school for the learners.
Opportunities
1.Presence of potential donors and benefactors
2.LGU’s provision of financial assistance (SEF)
3. Newly renovated/ repaired classrooms to ensure quality
education for our clients – the Rosario Central Elementary School
Learners.
THANK YOU….