KICK OFF MEETING

LIPI AND STEPI

Jakarta, 28 March 2019

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 RPJMN as National Development Plan

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Indonesian STI Policy Goals in RPJMN
RPJMN 2010-2014
RPJMN 2005-2009
1) Increasing the quantity of new
invention in STI in order to
augment added value in the
production sector and natural
resources management system
2) Increasing the supply, human
resources , and infrastructures of
Science, Technology and
Innovation (STI)
3) Establishing mechanicsm of
intermadiation which can
optimalize utilization of R&D
output ; increasing cooperation
within National Innovation System
Framework
4) Creating a conducive climate
for creativity, intellectual property
(IP), and national standardization
system
http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
1) Strengthening the role of
STI to improve the
efficiency & productivity of
R&D center in Indonesia
2) Empowering the STI
human capital through the
increasing of quantity,
education level and quality
of researcher, improving the
infrastructure of R&D
3) Improving STI network
through intensive &
productive cooperation
between supplier of
technology and user
4) Increasing national
capacity in developing,
application of technology ,
and also improving
innovative entrepreneurial
RPJMN 2015-2019
1) Increasing the capacity
of STI can obtained by :
a) competitiveness of
production goods &
services , b) secure its
sustainability the
employment of natural
resources and environment,
c) establishing groundwork
for the society towards
global challenge
2) Improvement for
Sustainability of natural
resources and environment
3) Development of 100
Technoparks in every
regency and Science Park
in every Provinces
 Research Group I

ANALYSIS OF THE POLICYMAKING

PROCESS OF INDONESIAN STI POLICY IN
RPJMN 2015-2019

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Research Questions
1. How is the policy-making process of Indonesian STI policy in
RPJMN 2015-2019?
2. How have the exogenous factors influenced the policy-making
process of Indonesian STI Policy in RPJMN 2015-2019?

Purposes
1. To explain the policy-making process of Indonesian STI Policy in
RPJMN 2015
2. To identify how exogenous factors have influenced the policy-
making process of Indonesian STI Policy in RPJMN 2005-2019

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Research Method

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

Source: Ostrom, 2007

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Research Group II

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION

PROCESS OF INDONESIAN STI POLICY OF
RPJMN 2015-2019

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Research Question:
1. What is STI policy implemented and how is the implementation
structure?
2. How is implementing process of STI Policy in RPJMN 2015-2019
in terms of content of policy and context of implementation?

Purpose:
1. Mapping the STI Policy in RPJMN 2015 – 2019 that are
implemented;
2. Analyzing the process of implementing the STI Policy in RPJMN
2015-2019 in terms of content of policy and context of
implementation; and
3. Give recommendation for a more effective process of
implementation of STI Policy in RPJMN 2015 – 2019.

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Research Methods

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

 Research Group III

EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAM OF RESEARCH

CONSORTIA

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

Purpose: Evaluating the program of research consortia of the Indonesian
ministry of research and technology and higher education (MRTHE),
which covers the governance and management of the program, and how
the program affects how members of consortia carried out their research,
coordinated works among themselves, shared knowledge with each
other, and achieved their intended target.

Design/methodology/approach: It will be clarified how MRTHE

understood the concept of consortium and planned to realize it, and
whether the realization of the program was fully based on their
understanding of the concept or it was also affected by pragmatical
consideration which made the implementation deviated from the ideal
concept. It will also be investigated how the members of consortia took
advantage of the program. Documents/reports and interview with the
managers and staffs of MRTHE will be triangulated with the case study of
a number of consortia.

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia

(Expected) Findings: Our preliminary interview with a coordinator of a
consortium shows that it was not truly a consortium. It is more a label of a
scheme of research funding from which researchers and academics took
advantage. However, in term of research, it encouraged public R&D
institutions to network with industry. Even though the industry has not
been seriously engaged in research, they provided industrial problems as
well as material needed by researchers.

Research limitations/implications: Probably we may not find any

genuine consortium in this program, but we may be able to show this
scheme can be better off without being labeled as program of consortia.
Not only this name misled others who assumed that this was truly a
program of research consortia, it also created unnecessary
administrative overhead cost.

Originality/value: This study will reveal how an idea from overseas

which was not fully understood and has never been experienced in
reality was being implemented; and how people seek to reconcile the
implementation of their ideal of consortia with the pragmatism that
demanded the work should be done and achieve some targets.
http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
 THANK YOU

http://www.lipi.go.id Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia