DETERMINATION OF PROBABLE CAUSE Important to distinguish between 2 kinds: Executive and Judicial PROBABLE CAUSE Existence of such facts and circumstances as would excite the belief in a reasonable mind that the person charged is probable guilty of the crime charged. PROBABLE CAUSE Key: Look for the elements. PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT P.I. National/Regional State Prosecutors, Provincial/City Prosecutors Others authorized by law TAKE NOTE
Katarungang Pambarangay, Private Crimes, Children In Conflict With Law KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
Gen. Rule: Barangay Conciliation is a
precondition for filing a complaint EXCEPTIONS • Government is a party • Accused is a Public Officer and dispute relates to official functions • Corporation, Partnership, or Juridical Entity • Parties reside in barangays of different cities • Penalty is imprisonment of more than 1 year or fine of more than P5,000 • No private offended party • Urgent legal action needed to prevent injustice PRIVATE CRIMES cannot be prosecuted de officio Concubinage, Adultery, Seduction, Abduction, Defamation, Acts of Lasciviousness CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW 15 and below – Exempt with Intervention 15-18 – Exempt subject to Intervention, UNLESS acted with discernment PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Procedure: Complaint, Counter-
Affidavit, Clarificatory Questions COMPLAINT / INFORMATION
If preliminary investigation is not
required, may be filed directly with MTC, except in Manila and other Chartered Cities INQUEST
Informal and summary investigation,
involving persons arrested and detained without a warrant of arrest, to determine whether said persons should remain under custody and be charged in court. WARRANTLESS ARREST
Paragraphs (a) and (b) of Section 5,
Rule 113 INQUEST PROCEDURE
Will arrested person avail of right to
Preliminary Investigation? IF YES TO P.I.
Execute a waiver of the provisions of
Article 125 (12-18-36 hour rule), with assistance of counsel IF YES TO P.I.
Respondents will be detained. But
Preliminary Investigation should last only 15 days IF NO TO P.I.
12-18-36 Rule applies.
Prosecutor to determine probable cause based solely on complaint and attached evidence REMEDY IF NO PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION HELD Accused to ask for a preliminary investigation within 5 days from the time he learns of the filing of a complaint / information PETITION FOR REVIEW
When with Office of the Secretary
Regional State Prosecutor Prosecutor General PETITION FOR REVIEW
Within 15 days from Resolution
CONTENTS OF PETITION FOR REVIEW Parties, I.S. No. and Crim. Case No., Venue of P.I., Material Dates, Facts, Assignment of Errors, Legal Bases, Proof of Service, Verification ATTACHMENTS OF PETITION FOR REVIEW Duplicate original or certified true copy of Resolution appealed from; Pleadings and evidence (no new); Motion to Defer Proceedings APPEAL FROM RESOLUTION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW Motion for Reconsideration to the Secretary of Justice APPEAL FROM MR TO SOJ
Appeal to the Office of the President
ONLY when offense charged is punishable by Reclusion Perpetua CRESPO v. MOGUL • Once an Information is filed in Court, any disposition of the case rests on the sound discretion of the Court; • Courts generally adhere to the policy of non- interference in the conduct of preliminary investigations; • Findings of the SOJ are only subject to review when made with grave abuse of discretion. ARRAIGNMENT Presence of the Accused; Personally Enter Plea; Information must be read in a language understandable to him ARRAIGNMENT Information must be sufficient in form and substance ARRAIGNMENT – PRESENCE OF PRIVATE OFFENDED PARTY For Plea Bargaining Determination of Civil Liability PRE-TRIAL
Within 30 days from the date the
Court acquires jurisdiction over the person of the accused PRE-TRIAL
Stipulation of Facts, Plea Bargaining,
Marking of Evidence, Number and Names of Witnesses PRE-TRIAL
All agreements or admissions MUST
BE reduced in writing, signed by the accused and counsel, and approved by the Court BAIL
When not required – 6 months
When Bail is Matter of Right When Bail is a Matter of Discretion (death, reclusion perpetua, life) TRIAL TECHNIQUES PREPARING YOUR WITNESS
Meet and Confer
Let witnesses tell their story without interrupting / arguing with them THE CASE Remember facts by heart Reinforce your theory continuously Be ready with all applicable laws and jurisprudence TRIAL PROPER Personality of Lawyer Court Decorum and Appearance Humility Style DIRECT EXAMINATION “We are offering the testimony of A to prove the material allegations in the Information” PREPARING FOR DIRECT EXAMINATION Q&A / Outline Checklist of Purposes Checklist of exhibits and accused to be identified by the witness CROSS EXAMINATION Limitations Goal: destroy/discredit, elicit When not to cross INTERPOSING OBJECTIONS Documentary Physical Testimonial COMMON OBJECTIONS • Witness is incompetent • Question is immaterial / irrelevant • Calls for a conclusion • Calls for Opinion from a Witness who is not an expert • Leading • Inadmissible • Misleading / No Basis COMMON OBJECTIONS • Calls for a Narration • Compound Question • Question is Vague • Hypothetical • Embarassing • Right against Self-degradation • Asked and Answered • Argumentative (prompts a witness to draw inferences from facts) COMMON OBJECTIONS • Not covered by the purposes • Hearsay Evidence • Answer not Responsive to Question (Move to STRIKE OUT answer) • Privileged Communication • Incriminating Question • Evidence Illegally Obtained • Best Evidence Rule • Not covered on direct or cross PLEADINGS
Motions Manifestations Comment / Oppositions FORMAL OFFER OF EVIDENCE
Enumerate your Exhibits
State Purposes Indicate who identified PROMULGATION