G.M.

VEDAK INSTITUTE OF
TECHNOLOGY,TALA.
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Academic Year:-2018-2019
“Assessment of Value Engineering Technique in Construction
Industry and its Comparative Study with Conventional
Method”
1) BHAGAT HEENA
2) GAIBI ARBAZ
3) HAMBIRE BALAJI
4) KANGUTKAR PRERANA

Guided BY:- Mr. LANKE AKASH

Co- Guide :- Mr. SATHE PRANEET
CONTENT
 Introduction
 Objective of Work
 Literature Review
 Methodology
 Parameters
 References

2
 INTRODUCTION
 Value Engineering is an approach to improve the value of an item by first understanding
the functions of the item and their value, then identifying its constituent components and
associated cost.

 Value Engineering is used in a wide range in order to improve the overall efficiency and
net profit without sacrificing the quality.

 VE is a cost cutting tool.

 Used to reduce the cost of the project

without disturbing the quality and value

of the products.

3
 Value Engineering also called as Value Analysis.

 In any sector the major support to begin any work is depended on

money and the industry has to overcome a number of challenges.

 Value Engineering can be applied more than once and also at any
stage of the project life cycle.

 VE is defined as the ratio

of function to the overall

cost.

VE= FUNCTION
COST

4
 Objective of work
1. To study and understand the phases involved in value Engineering Job Plan.

2. To identify the various parameters of value Engineering used in construction

projects.

3. To analyze the different parameters on the basis of :

a. Quality

b. Feasibility

c. Demand

d. Cost

4. To compare the conventional method with alternative value engineered parameters.

5. To analyze and compare the cost of alternative method used in VE with the
traditional method

5
 Literature review
Year of
Sr.N
o
Title Author Publicatio Summary
n
1. Application of Dr. P. 2017 1. Presented the questionnaire
Value Partheeban survey to find out how
Engineering in et.al effectively VE is applied in
Construction construction industry and how
Job Sites- A many employees are aware of
Case Study VE technique.
2. It was concluded that 20% OF
them are not following VE and
80% are following VE in whole
Tamilnadu state.
2. A Study on R. Ravish 2016 1. Demonstrated the total saving
Application of et al. cost in residential building after
VE in the application of VE technique
Residential and the total cost saved was Rs
Building 119400 from the estimated cost
Projects i.e 6,61,82,000.

6
 Literature review
Year of
Sr.N
o
Title Author Publicatio Summary
n
Analysis of P. S. Patil . Attar, presented an evaluation
Door System by and selection techniques derived
Using Value from value engineering
Engineering principles for door system.
3. Technique Sliding door alternative was
selected as the best alternative,
which saves cost up to 60-80%
than the existing doors.

Integrated M. Khatib. 2015 state that risk is highest in the

Project Risk early stages of the project
Management lifecycle. A case study was done
and Value in which Value Engineering was
4. Engineering in adopted to reduce the project
Tendering cost and risk by using slip form
Process instead of traditional formwork
in construction companies.

7
 METHODOLOGY

OBJECTIVE OF STUDY

ADOPTION FOR VE IN VARIOUS

LITERATURE PARAMETERS
REVIEW

DATA COLLECTION CASE STUDIES OF

PARAMETERS

PERSONAL
MEETINGS ANALYZATION

TRADITIONAL VE METHOD
METHOD

RESULT AND
DISCUSSION

COMPARISON

CONCLUSION
8
Different Phases in Value Engineering

9
Purpose of Value Engineering
 The very first purpose of value engineering is to reduce the excess
cost in the project.

 To determine the feasibility and best alternatives design.

 To improve the quality of the construction.

 To enhance the customer satisfaction.

 To identify and solve the problems faced.

 To improve the performances

10
 Parameters

Figure: 1.Gypsum Plaster Figure: 3. Rat Trap Bond

Figure: 2 AAC BLOCK

11
Benefits of Value Engineering in Construction

 Reducing the operation and maintenance cost.

 Improving quality management.

 Avoiding the repetitive works

 Reducing the cost of the project by 15 to 20% & unnecessary costs

 Reducing estimated cost without disturbing the quality.

 Improving the skill

 Giving the ideas of using the new techniques.

 Faster construction time.

12
 Build teamwork.

 On-time delivery

 High quality.

 Improving workforce efficiency

 Customer satisfaction

 Better performing facilities.

13
GYPSUM PLASTER:

 Gypsum plaster, or plaster of Paris, is produced by heating gypsum to about

300 °F (150 °C)

 CaSO4·2H2O + heat → CaSO4·0.5H2O + 1.5H2O (released as steam).

14
Properties of the gypsum plaster:
 It is light in weight.

 It sets by natural process of crystallization.

 It is slightly soluble in water at the rate of 2gm/litre.

 It shows excellent adhesion to the fibrous materials.

 It sets with small change in volume with negligible shrinkage

or drying.

15
Advantages of gypsum plaster:
 Due to its ease of application, it is used for ornamental plaster work and also
for
preparation of blocks and boards.
 The gypsum plaster boards are used for:
 Ceiling of room
 Internal lining work of wall
 Partition wall

16
Drawbacks of gypsum plaster:
 It Cannot withstand Damp Condition for Period of Time.

 Gypsum Plaster Bags should not be kept for more Three months even in dry
place.

 It cannot be use as External Plaster.

17
Rate and Analysis
 Gypsum Bag of 25 kg cost 260 rupees

 Rates for 1 cum.

SR.NO Materi Quanti Units Rate Amoun
al ty (Rs) t
(Rs)
1. Gypsum 6.2 Kg 260 1612
Bag
2. Chicken 10.76 Sq.ft 3.78 40.67
Mesh
(Fiber)

Total 1652.67

18
 AAC Block:

 The Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC)

 AAC is produced from the common materials lime, sand, cement and water,
and a small amount of Aluminium.

19
Advantage of AAC Block:
 Light weight

 Speedy Construction

 Non-Toxic

 Moisture Resistance

 Perfect Size and Shape

 High Resistance to Water Penetration

 Thermal Insulation

 Reduction in Project Cost

20
Disadvantage of AAC Block:
 Cost of production is higher than ordinary concrete block

 Availability of AAC Block are not locally available

 AAC blocks are Brittle and hence transportation is to done carefully

 Manufacturer are Limited

21
RATE AND ANALYSIS

AAC Block Rate For 10.76 Sq.ft

SR.NO Material Quantity Units Rates (Rs) Amount

(Rs)
1. AAC 8.18 Nos 70 572.6
Block
2. Mortar 3.34 Kg 18.75 62.625
TOTAL 635.225

22
 RAT TRAP WALL:

• In Rat trap wall commonly Red clay bricks are used

• Bricks are laid on the edges
• In opposite direction of conventional Brick wall

23
ADVANTAGES OF USING RAT TRAP BOND
 By adopting this method of masonry, you can save on approx. 20-35% less
bricks and 30-50% less mortar; also this reduces the cost of a 9 inch wall by
20-30 % and productivity of work enhances.

 For 1 m3 of Rat trap bond, 470 bricks are required compared to

conventional brick wall where a total of 550 bricks are required.

 Rat trap bond wall is a cavity wall construction with added advantage of
thermal comfort. The interiors remain cooler in summer and warmer in
winters.

24
 Rate and Analysis:
RAT Trap wall cost for 100 sq.m

SR.NO Material Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount

(Rs)
1. Bricks 5599 Nos 4 22,396
2. Sand 13 Cu.m 4500 58500
3. cement 78 Bags 350 27300
Total 108196

25
 REFERENCES
 Sharma, V., and Kumar, R., 2017 “Analysis to Reduce Cost through Value
Engineering of Furniture Product in Furniture Industry- A Case Study,”
International Journal ofvMechanical and Production Engineering, Vol. (5), no.11,
pp.16-23.
 Dhayalkar, S., and Ahire, H., 2016 “Value Engineering in Construction Industry,”
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering
Technology, Vol. (4), no.8, pp. 135-138.
 Dhayalkar, S., and Ahire, H., 2016 “Application of Value Engineering in Road
Construction Project,” Imperial Journal Of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. (2),
no.11, pp. 101-104.
 Rane, N.L., and Attarde, P.M., 2016 “Application of Value Engineering in
Commercial Building Projects,” Internation Journal of Latest Trends in
Engineering and Technology, Vol. (6), no.3, pp. 286-291.

26
 References
 Rane, N.L., 2016 “Application of Value Engineering Techniques in Building
Construction Projects,” International Journal of Engineering Sciences and
Research Technology, Vol. (5), no.7, pp.857-863
 Ravish, M., and Vinoth, K., 2016 “A Study on Application of Value Engineering in
Residential Building Projects,” Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and
Humanities, Vol. (4), no.1, pp. 10-20.
 Saganti, S., Nalagoppula, R.S., and Aleem, Md., 2016 “Application of Value
Engineering in Building Construction,” International of Advance Journal Research
in Science and Engineering, Vol. (5), no. 10, pp. 253-267.
 Kaveen, S., Aleem, M.I., and Thaarrini, J., 2015 “Application of Value
Engineering in Construction Project to Predict Time and Cost Overrun- An
Overview,” International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science,
Vol. (1), no.9, pp. 382-386.

27
Thank you

28