Sei sulla pagina 1di 40

MNO 2705

Day 1: An Introduction to Leadership and


Decision Making Under Uncertainty

Sam Yam, Ph.D.


Assistant Professor of Management
National University of Singapore
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Agenda
• Who’s Sam?
• Course overview
• Team assignment
• Introduction to a decision making exercise
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Who is Sam?

B.S. Psychology 2009


University of Washington
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Who is Sam?

M.A. Child Psychology 2011


Washington State University
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Who is Sam?

M.S. Organizational Behavior 2014 Started as an Assistant Professor in


Ph.D. Organizational Behavior 2015 June 2015
University of Washington National University of Singapore
NUS Presentation Title 2006

My research
NUS Presentation Title 2006

My research: Examples
• Is corporate citizenship always good?
https://hbr.org/2016/09/pushing-employees-to-go-the-extra-mile-can-be-counterproductive

• Can flextime hurt your career?


https://hbr.org/2014/05/with-flextime-bosses-prefer-early-birds-to-night-owls

• How can air pollution affect employees?


http://www.todayonline.com/commentary/how-air-pollution-affects-workplace-behaviour

• Does humor help or hurt leadership?


https://hbr.org/2017/03/when-joking-with-your-employees-leads-to-bad-behavior
NUS Presentation Title 2006

If you want to know more about me


The Straits Times:
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/a-professor-
whos-as-youthful-as-his-students

Poets & Quants:


http://poetsandquants.com/2016/04/13/2016-best-40-40-
professors-kai-chi-sam-yam-national-university-singapore/
NUS Presentation Title 2006
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Who are your TAs?


NUS Presentation Title 2006

Overview of the module


• Syllabus (to be found in your IVLE Workbin)
• Readings:
• All readings will be made available in IVLE or available in the
NUS online library
• Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York:
Farrar, Straus & Giroux (recommended)
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Assessment
Individual-based course work
In-class participation (20%)
In-class quiz (30%)

Team-based course work


Decision Challenge Team Project (Teams of 5-7) (30%)
Decision-Point Reflection (Teams of 2) (20%)
NUS Presentation Title 2006

In-class participation (20%)


• Focused on how you enhance the learning of your peers.
Assessment criteria emphasises presence, participation,
contribution of ideas, and collegiality.
• Quantity and quality
NUS Presentation Title 2006

In-class quiz: March 23rd, 1000-1200 (30%)


• Focused on understanding of and ability to work with concepts
covered in the assigned readings. A portion of the quiz will be
case-based, with the case distributed one week in advance.
• Closed book format
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Decision Challenge Team Project (30%)


• Identify and investigate a challenging decision situation from the past
(at least 50 years ago), recent events (within the last 12 months), or
an ongoing challenge
• The situation must be
• Asia-relevant
• involves aspects of uncertainty and risk
• Analyze the situation from the standpoint of the essentials for
effective decision making
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Presentation Project Examples


NUS Presentation Title 2006

Decision Challenge Team Project (30%)


Deliverables
• Elevator Pitch: Your team will present an “elevator pitch” of your
proposal during class on Weeks 5 and 6. You will receive comments
from the whole class.
• Formal Project Proposal: One page (due the Friday of your elevator
pitch week)
• 20-min presentation + 10-min Q&A in Weeks 11 and 12
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Decision-Point Reflection (20%)


• 3-page essay
• Dyad-based project
• Can be submitted to IVLE at ANY time during the semester,
but latest by Apr 19th.
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Leadership as a group process

Let’s make teams!


NUS Presentation Title 2006

• Meet and greet your team members


• Email the TA your team information for both
team projects (Names, Student ID, Team
Number)

Subject line: Decision Challenge Team 8am


OR
Decision Reflection Dyad 8am
TA: obrltc@nus.edu.sg
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Are leadership and decision making common sense?


• Fluffy; can’t be taught; useless; I rather take finance modules
• I was genuinely surprised by how much I enjoyed this module
given my immense hate for fluff….. And I felt that MNO can be
applicable and non-fluffy, and that the topic has actual substance
and is worth discussing about.
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Leadership: Does it matter to organizations?


“I hated organizational behavior at business school. But OB turns
out to be the most important class you can take here. Because the
ability to attract people, to pay them the right way, to create culture
and values and reinforce them, that’s what makes companies
great.”

Jeff Immelt, former CEO of General Electric in a speech at Harvard


Business School
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Leadership: Does it matter to organizations?


• 2006 Graduate Management Admission Council® survey of
1270 employers found that “soft skills” were most attractive to
recruiters, but also most lacking
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Does it matter to me?


NUS Presentation Title 2006

Ethics: Does it matter?


Develop valuable skills
“Personal ethics and integrity” was listed as one of the three most
important attributes recruiters look for in student hires (Wall Street
Journal, 2007)
1. Communication and interpersonal skills
2. Ability to work well within a team
3. Personal ethics and integrity
…….
14. Content knowledge of the core curriculum
Hays (2014)
“[In Singapore] Employers view a candidate’s ethical behaviour as a non-
negotiable…..[this] is apparent across all industries, although it is most
obvious in the banking sector.”
NUS Presentation Title 2006
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Evidence-based management
• How Google sold its engineers on management
• The team:
• 1/3 PhDs (social psychology, organizational behavior, sociology,
etc.)
• 1/3 MBAs (the usual HR people)
• 1/3 Statisticians (data mining experts)
• Empiricism
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Evidence-based management
1. Opinion: Gut feeling (e.g., “I have a friend who…”)
The plural of anecdote is not data
2. Data: Structured but raw; not easily digestible
3. Metrics: Ratios, counts, trends, etc.
4. Analysis: Identifies relationships (e.g., an increase in XXX
leads to an increase in YYY)
5. Insights: Influences decision makers
6. Actions: Process or policy changes
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Foundations of social sciences


• Averages, standard deviations, outliers
• Moderators
• Variables that affect the direction and/or strength of the relation
between dependent and independent variables
• Causality?
1. Temporal precedence
2. Covariation of the cause and effect
3. Ruling out plausible alternative explanations
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Decision making simulation


• Leadership team to guide deliberations
• Participants are investors in carter racing enterprise and have a
vested interest in its success
• Maximum of 30 minutes provided in which to make a decision
about racing
1. Spend 10 mins in reading the case individually
2. Spend the next 20 mins discussing what to do
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Payoff for racing


Outcome Probability Revenues Expenses Expected
value
Race: 50% 1.000 K + 750 K
Finish top 5 (12/24) 500 K
Race: 13% 500 K + 65 K
Finish not top 5 (3/24)
Race: 29% 20 K - 5.8 K
Blow engine (7/24)
Race: 8% 500 K + 40 K
No finish other (2/24)

Net expected value for racing ~800 K


NUS Presentation Title 2006

Payoff for not racing


Outcome Probability Revenues Expenses Expected
value
No race: 100% 500 K 25 K 482.5 K
7.5 K
NUS Presentation Title 2006
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Gasket failure probabilities


Temperature Races with Number of Estimated
Range (F) Incidents Races Probability

< 60 3 3 100%

61-70 3 11 27%

71-80 1 9 11%

>80 0 1 0%
NUS Presentation Title 2006
NUS Presentation Title 2006

The Challenger Disaster

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYX35Z_L-dw
NUS Presentation Title 2006

The Challenger Disaster


• NASA was under severe budget pressure. The shuttle
program’s success is vital to future congressional support
• The record of 24 successful launches was a powerful decision
context. Because of these previous successes, engineers were
asked to prove a failure was going to occur, not that success
was questionable
• The Challenger launch was intended as a media event to attract
attention to the shuttle program. The mission’s success was
regarded as important for morale within NASA
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Decision making conclusions

Advocacy Inquiry
Underlying concept Contest Collaboration
Purpose Persuading & lobbying Testing & evaluating
Participants’ role Spokespeople Critical thinkers

Minority views Discouraged/dismissed Cultivated/valued


Outcomes Winners/losers Collective ownership
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Decision making conclusions

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it


and whenever history repeats itself the price goes up
NUS Presentation Title 2006

Next class
• Ethical decision making
• Do the readings in the following order: 1) Ferrell et al. (2017)
and 2) Sandel (2009)

Potrebbero piacerti anche