0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
11 visualizzazioni12 pagine
Kohlberg's theory of moral development proposes that individuals progress through three distinct levels of moral reasoning - preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. At the preconventional level, individuals consider rewards and punishments. At the conventional level, they aim to please others. At the postconventional level, they use broader moral principles. The document presents a scenario where a man considers stealing a drug to save his dying wife and discusses arguments he could make from each of Kohlberg's three moral reasoning levels.
Kohlberg's theory of moral development proposes that individuals progress through three distinct levels of moral reasoning - preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. At the preconventional level, individuals consider rewards and punishments. At the conventional level, they aim to please others. At the postconventional level, they use broader moral principles. The document presents a scenario where a man considers stealing a drug to save his dying wife and discusses arguments he could make from each of Kohlberg's three moral reasoning levels.
Kohlberg's theory of moral development proposes that individuals progress through three distinct levels of moral reasoning - preconventional, conventional, and postconventional. At the preconventional level, individuals consider rewards and punishments. At the conventional level, they aim to please others. At the postconventional level, they use broader moral principles. The document presents a scenario where a man considers stealing a drug to save his dying wife and discusses arguments he could make from each of Kohlberg's three moral reasoning levels.
In a European country, a woman is near death from a special kind of cancer. The one drug that the doctors think might save her is a medicine that a medical researcher has recently discovered. The drug is expensive to make, and the researcher is charging ten times the cost, or $5,000, for a small dose. The sick woman’s husband, Henry, approaches everyone he knows in hopes of borrowing money, but he can get together only about $2,500. He tells the researcher that his wife is dying and asks him to lower the price of the drug or let him pay later. The researcher says, “No, I discovered the drug, and I’m going to make money from it.” Henry is desperate and considers stealing the drug for his wife. What would you tell Henry to do? Level 1 Preconventional Morality
At this level, the concrete interests of
the individual are considered in terms of rewards and punishments. Level 1 In Favor of Stealing the Drug
“If you let your wife die, you will get in
trouble. You’ll be blamed for not spending the money to save her, and there’ll be an investigation of you and the druggist for your wife’s death.” Level 1 Against Stealing the Drug “You shouldn’t steal the drug because you’ll be caught and sent to jail if you do. If you do get away, your conscience will bother you thinking how the police will catch up with you any minute.” Level 2 Conventional Morality At this level, people approach moral problems as members of society. They are interested in pleasing others by acting as good members of society. Level 2 In Favor of Stealing the Drug
“If you let your wife die, you’ll never be
able to look anybody in the face again.” Level 2 Against Stealing the Drug
“After you steal the drug, you’ll feel
bad thinking how you’ve brought dishonor on your family and yourself; you won’t be able to face anyone again.” Level 3 Postconventional Morality
At this level, people use moral
principles which are seen as broader than those of any particular society. Level 3 In Favor of Stealing the Drug
“If you don’t steal the drug and if you
let your wife die, you’ll always condemn yourself for it afterward. You won’t be blamed and you’ll have lived up to the outside rule of the law, but you won’t have lived up to your own conscience and standards of honesty.” Level 3 Against Stealing the Drug
“If you steal the drug, you won’t be
blamed by other people, but you’ll condemn yourself because you won’t have lived up to your own conscience and standards of honesty.” Evaluation of Kohlberg’s Theory Strength: This theory has had a substantial influence on our understanding of moral development. Weaknesses: (1) It pertains to moral judgments, not moral behavior. Knowing right from wrong does not mean that we will always act in accordance with our judgments. (2) This theory applies primarily to Western society and its moral code; cross cultural research conducted in cultures with different moral systems suggests that Kohlberg’s theory is not necessarily applicable.
Dark Psychology: Help Yourself to Protect, Recognize and Unmask the People (Secrets of Psychological Warfare Dark Nlp Dark Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Super Manipulation)