Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Public Administration
Chapter outline
Models of decision making in administration
Rational-comprehensive model
Bargaining model
Incremental model
Participative model
Public choice model
The ethical dimensions of decision making
Institutional ethics
Personal ethics
The limits of decision making
18
Introduction
Decision making is central to PA
It is complex, collective, & involve many actors
Goals of decisions may be vague, while
bureaucrats cannot deal with vagueness
information maybe unavailable all the time for
decision making
Decisions maybe programmed or un-
programmed
Values and ethics are important
Models of decision making follows:
3
Rational-comprehensive model
Assume decision makers as rational people
An economic model that suggest five steps
that maximize outputs of a decision
1. Identify a public problem
2. Clarify goals and objectives of public policy
3. Identify alternatives to reach goals
4. Calculate consequences of each alternative
5. Select the best alternative
Model assumptions: efficiency & reduction of
externality (effect on others) problems as cost
benefit analysis is conducted for alternatives
4
Rational model problems …
Generally problems come from…
Pure rationality is impossible in real world
Time limit people abilities to explore options & info
Cost of acquiring info & communications among
the many levels & individuals in the government
involved in decisions
Bias towards one option & one problem
The nearest easiest alternative
Clash among actors about values, & ends &
means
Sunk cost & commitment to previous decisions
5
Six problems of rational model
1. Individual barriers
2. Organizational barriers
3. The inputs from outside the organization
4. Time frame can limit decision making
5. The civil service system impose values & limits
6. Problems in securing & processing the
information needed
The near impossibility to the comprehensive
model led to alternative models as follows
6
Bargaining model
involves conflict, negotiation, & persuasion
A rational decision should bargain out to attract
sufficient political support to become acceptable
The “means-ends” /consequences of the
rational model is impossible if they’re confused
by the many actors involved in the decision
Many worthy public policy goals are so broad
they often conflict with one another.
This require a ”muddling-through” decision
making process
7
Incremental model
Making a series of limited, successive
comparisons-”continuing incremental adjustments”
rather than comparing all possible options
It focus on short term effects; looks at the most
crucial consequences; uses less formal ways to
evaluate them. it has two main steps
Redefining ends & means. Treating them as not distinct
Arriving at consensus. Measuring acceptance to interests
The model help administrators to be responsive &
representative to their political communities
8
Incremental & bargaining models
9
Participative model
Assumes rationality depend on the inclusion of
all those who are affected by the decision
It often involves consultation & may have voting
Using committees, interest groups, boards …
It emphasize the value of representativeness
This may bring better information & knowledge
But it may bring too much information
Mixed unbalanced interests may brought in the
participation process
Also it may result in less rational decisions
10
Public choice model
Values efficiency & free market-mechanism
As public officials will be motivated by their
own interests (power, security, income),
They will then avoid risks & promote growth of
their agencies’ programs, which will produce
bigger but usually less efficient government
So it better to turn over to private sector
By contracting out for services or by privatization
The model is very simple: privatize & deregulate
11
Public choice model problems …
Efficiency come on the expense of equality
Also, some services cannot be privatized
Besides the self-regulating effect of the
market does not always work
In free market, monopoly may strike the idea
of efficiency as it eliminate competition
Free market effect does not work unless
information are available sufficiently
In contracting out, vendors may manipulate
local government
12
Decision models & Org schools
Org school Decision making model
Humanist Participative
Decentralized, ad hoc,
Values: flexibility, randomness, responsiveness
Neoclassical Bureaucratic
Less centralized, reliance on rules, procedural rationality, Values:
incrementalism, stability, fairness, predictability
Systems Political power or bargaining
Consistent with social actors, pluralists in organizations
Values: participation, incrementalism, conflict, interplay of interests
New Mgt Public choice
Free market, information mgt
Values: efficiency, maximizing self interest
13
The ethics of decision making
Ethics: the right & wrong about goals, tactics,
or decisions dealing with public problems
Institutional ethics: principles & values
pursued by governments & agencies.
Many government actions are ethically debatable:
ex Hiroshima bombing
Issuing ethics codes are used for declaring ethical
values adapted by institutions
Personal ethics: moral values for public
officials such as honesty, fairness, & integrity
14
The limits of decision making
Time
Uncertainty
Distortion of information
Crisis
15