Sei sulla pagina 1di 61

Problem Solving Project:

Reaction with Separation

Objective:
To overcome the PX equilibrium
limited reaction

1
Aromatic Complex: p-Xylene Production
Heterogeneous Catalysis
Reforming – Bifunctional Catalysis:

1) It is a catalytic process to convert nephtha to high octane number


gasoline.
2) It is a bifunctional surface catalysis. The catalysts consist of:
 Metal: Re and/or Pt 3
 Metal Oxides: transition alumina functions as “Acidic” catalyst
Heterogeneous Catalysis
Reforming – Bifunctional Catalysis (Cont.):

3) The metal oxide support must not be too strongly or too weakly acidic:
chlorinated Al2O3 is optimal.

4) Dehydrocyclization reaction requires both metal and the acid.

 Metal alones does not catalyze the branching reaction; they require
an acidic function to generate carbenium ions, which undergo the
desired isomerization.

 The acidic function alone is not sufficient to generate the carbenium


ions because it is too weakly acidic to protonate paraffins; metal
catalyzes dehydrogenation of paraffins to give olefins, which are
easily protonated and thereby converted by carbenium ion routes.

4
Heterogeneous Catalysis
Reforming – Bifunctional Catalysis (Cont.):

5) The presence of excess hydrogen is required:


 minimize catalyst deactivation

6) Catalytic reforming is first developed by UOP in mid-1940 (World War II)


 The UOP Platforming Process

5
Aromatic Complex: p-Xylene Production
Isomar Flowscheme

Reactor Light Ends


Net Gas

Product
Separator
Net
Charge Liquid
Heater
Deheptanizer

Combined Feed
Exchanger Clay
Treater
Product
Condenser
To Aromatic
Compressor Fractionation Unit

Feed from Makeup H2


Parex Unit
Isomar Process
Metal
• Main demand is for pX
+ H2 to make polyester
EB
resin
mX
• EB, mX oX and pX can
oX be brought back to
equilibrium over a
Acid

suitable catalyst
• EB is harder to
Metal isomerize so two types
of Isomar
+ paraffins due to cracking – EB dealkylation (to
pX
Bz)
– EB isom (to C8 mix)
~24 mol% pX eqbm yield
C8-Aromatic Reaction is
Equilibrium Controlled
: Limited to 22-24% PX
•Goal: How to over come the PX equilibrium limited
reaction of 22-24% by combining “reaction with
separation”
Para Xylene Meta Xylene Ortho Xylene Ethyl Benzene

22% 48% 22% 8%


9
Specific Properties
for the Separation of C8 Aromatics

+ 13.3

The UOP “Parex”


20

UOP’s 1st generation process


1

The UOP “Ebex”

10
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Reactive Separation Processes

 Principle
Reactive separation processes are unique in that
they combine the unit operations of reaction and
separation into a single, simultaneous operation.

11
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
12
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
13
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
14
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
15
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
16
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
17
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
18
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
19
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
20
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
21
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
22
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
23
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
24
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
25
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
26
Adsorption
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
27
Adsorption
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
28
Adsorption
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
29
Adsorption
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
30
Adsorption
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Schematic Pulse Test
(2 Aromatic Components and Paraffin Tracer)

RB
RA Net retention volume of A = RA
Net retention volume of A = RB
Concentration

Selectivity (B/A) = ฿ = RB/RA


Tracer Envelope half-width tracer = Wt
A B Envelope half-width, B = WB

Rate parameter = WB-Wt = DW


Wt WB

Volume, time

The net retention volume of any component is ideally proportional


to its distribution coefficient, i.e., its concentration in the
adsorbed phase, divided by its concentration in the unadsorbed
phase 31
Adsorption
Batch Adsorption
Feed, A + B

Desorbent, D Liquid Composition


0 100

A
B

Fixed D
Bed

Extract, A + D

Raffinate, B + D

32
Adsorption
Adsorptive Separation
with Moving Bed
Desorbent D

III Desorption D
Extract A&D of A

Flow of Solid
Flow of Liquid

Desorption
II of B
Feed A&B

Adsorption B
I of A
Raffinate B&D
Partial
IV Desorption
of D

0 100%
Liquid
Composition
33
Adsorption
Sorbex - Simulated Moving Bed
for Adsorptive Separation
1
Adsorbent Desorbent
Rotary
Chamber
2 Valve D
3
4 Extract
5 A
6
7
8
9 Feed
10 B
11
12
Raffinate

0 100%
Pumparound Liquid
Pump Composition

34
Adsorption
Sorbex - Simulated Moving Bed
Illustration of Changing Pumparound Flow
Rates with Changing Rotary Valve Positions

T=0 T = 90 Seconds T = 180 Seconds


1 1 1
Raffinate

IV 2 2 I 2
Desorbent IV Raffinate
3 3 3
Desorbent
III AC 4 AC 4 AC 4
IV Desorbent
FRC

FRC

FRC
Zone I Flow

Zone I Flow
Zone IV Flow

5 Extract III 5 5
6 6 Extract 6
II III
7 7 7 Extract
8 II 8 8
9 9 9
Feed
10 10 II 10
Feed
I 11 11 11
Feed
12 I 12 I 12
IV Raffinate

T = 270 Seconds T = 360 Seconds T = 450 Seconds


1 1 1
Feed

I 2 2 II 2
Feed
3 I 3 3
Raffinate
AC 4 AC 4 I AC 4
Raffinate
FRC

FRC

FRC
IV 5
Zone II Flow

Zone II Flow
Zone I Flow

Desorbent 5 5 Raffinate
IV 6
6 Desorbent 6
IV 7
III 7 7 Desorbent
8 Extract 8 III 8
III
9 9 Extract 9
10 10 10
Extract
II 11 11
AC = Adsorbent
11
II
12 12 12
Column I Feed II

35
Adsorption
Sorbex - Simulated Moving Bed
Moving Bed for Adsorptive Separation

Adsorbent Section Desorbent Recovery Section

1 Extract
Rotary Column
Adsorbent
Chamber 2 Valve
3
4 Extract
5
6 Desorbent
7
8
9
10 Raffinate
11 Column
12

Feed Raffinate

36
Adsorption
Sorbex -
Simulated
Moving Bed
Moving Bed for
Adsorptive
Separation

37
Adsorption
A 24-port Rotary Sorbex Valve
(Pilot Plant)

38
Adsorption
A 24-port Rotary
Sorbex Valve
with Adsorbent
(Pilot Plant)

From I&EC Process Design & Development, Vol. 15, Page 261, April 1976
39
Adsorption
Rotary
Valve
(Commercial)

40
Adsorption
41
Adsorption
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Reactive Distillation

Target properties of reaction system :

1) Reaction and distillation must occur at the same conditions

2) Equilibrium limited

3) Catalyst stability problem

4) Poor selectivity

Distillation 42
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Reactive Distillation

Example :

Reactive Distillation Process by Eastman Kodak (US Pat


4,435,595) for production of Methyl Acetate

H+
CH3COOH + CH3OH CH3COOCH3 + H2O

Note: Acetic acid functions as reactant and extractive agent for


azeotropes methyl acetate / water and methyl acetate / methanol

Distillation 43
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Production of Methyl Acetate by
Reactive Distillation

Distillation 44
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Benzene Alkylation by
Reactive Distillation

Distillation 45
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Distillation 46
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Distillation 47
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Extraction 48
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Extraction 49
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Extraction 50
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Extraction 51
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Non-polar
phase

Polar
phase

Extraction 52
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Membrane Reactor

Concept

Advantages

Examples

Membranes 53
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Membrane Reactor Concepts

1. Membrane as part of catalytyst or catalytic-support

Catalyst Ceramic membrane

A+B C
D

2. Membrane as part of Reactor


Ceramic membrane

A+B Catalyst C

Membranes 54
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Advantages of Catalytic Membrane Reactor

1. Integration of reaction and partial separation


into one process

2. Enhancement of thermodynamically limited or


Product-inhibited reactions

3. Controlled reaction rates for selective reactions

4. Lower temperature and less severe pressure

5. Reduced catalyst fouling

6. Better product with reduce cost

Membranes 55
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Representative Reactions for Catalytic
Membrane Reactors

1. Dehydrogenation – paraffin to olefin

2. Hydrogenation – olefin to paraffin

3. Hydrations – C3= + H2O to IPA + DIPE

4. Hydroformylation – olefin + CO to aldehyde or alcohol

5. Selective Oxidation – CH4 O2 to methanol

6. Alkylation

Membranes 56
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
EX: Membrane as part of catalyst or catalyst support

Ref: T.T. Tsotsis, et al, Chen Eng Sci Vol 45,


No 8, 2,423-2429 (1990)

• Ethane dehydrogenation using 40A alumina membrane

• Impregnated 5 wt% Pt on membrane (in side)

• Obtained 45% conversion (20% at equilibrium) at 600’C


Without sweep gas

• With sweep gas at the permeate side, obtained 78%


conversion

Membranes 57
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
EX: Membrane as Part of Reactor

Ref: Shell Int., UK Patent 2,201,159 (1988)

1. Propane dehydrpgenation using Cr2O3/alumina catalyst


and 100 A alumina membrane

• At 575°C obtained 59% conversion (40% without membrane)

2. 2M2-butene to isoprene dehydrogenation using


Zn/Pt/Sn/alumina catalyst and 100 A alumina membrane

• At 550°C obtained 37% conversion (27% without membrane)

3. Ethylbenzene dehydrogenation using V/Li/Fe/Cr/K/alumina catalyst


and 100 A alumina membrane

• At 625°C obtained 65% conversion (51% without membrane)


Membranes 58
Chapter 3: Separation Technology in General
Problem solving Project: To develop a reaction with
separation process to over come the 22% PX
equilibrium limited reaction

1) Divide students into 4 teams. Select one leader in


each team.

2) Team A: Reaction with Adsorption

3) Team B: Reaction with Distillation

4) Team C: Reaction with Extraction

5) Team D: Reaction with Membrane 59


Recommendations:

1) Select your P-xylene production reaction either:


a) Naphtha to C8-aromatics – Reforming or
b) Equilibrium conversion of OX, MX and EB to PX
- C8-aromatic isomerization process

2) Team A: Read to understand adsorption process – Sorbex technology.


Some background information: PX can be separated
From OX, MX and EB using adsorbent either BaX (with PDEB desorbent) or
KY (with toluene desorbent)

3) Team B: PX is difficult to distill from OX, MX, and EB because of their


close boiling points. Can you separate PX using extractive
distillation or other means? Understand more on distillation

4) Team C: Try to find a high soluble solvent for PX than OX, MX and EB. Or,
catalyst soluble in aqueous phase. Understand more on extraction
technology
60
5) Team D: Read to understand membrane for PX separation from OX, MX
and EB. Silicalite (or ZSM-5) membrane can separate PX and EB from OX,
MX, PX and EB

6) Each team after understand the PX reaction (select from 1a


or 1b – preferred 1b) and separation (selected from 2, 3, 4 or 5), match the
operation conditions (reaction and separation)

7) Keep in mind, since reaction and separation are in one unit.


Operating temperature and pressure should be comparable.

8) Each team can consult your professor. However, you can also email me
for consultation. I plan to ask UOP experts to help each team.

9) Reports:
a) 5 pages report
b) 20 min presentation from the team

61

Potrebbero piacerti anche