Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Crop:
Thompson
seedless
Place:
Chañaral alto,
Ovalle
Application:
Second growth
(4 - 6 mm)
Field control
electrostatic application
1
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Absolute Control
Crop:
Thompson Seedless
Place:
San Lorenzo
Ovalle
Application:
Second and third
growth stage
2 l/ha
diameter in millimetres
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Crop:
Thompson Seedless
Place:
Graneros
Rancagua
Application:
First and second
growth stage
2 l/ha/applic. diameter in millimetres
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Crop:
Crimson
Control
Place:
Lampa
Application:
Growth:
8-9 and 11-12 mm
Dose:
CYTOPLANT-400:
300 cm3/hl
Crop:
300 cm3/hl
diameter in millimetres
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Place:
Vicuña
La Serena
Application:
Second and third
growth stage
ANDEVA
Different letters
diff. next
p<0.05 diameter in millimetres
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Crop:
Red Globe
Place:
Los Andes
V region
Application:
6 – 7 and 10 mm
500 cm3/hl
400 l/ha, galaxy
diameter in millimetres
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Absolute C
Crop:
Thompson
seedless
Place:
Punitaqui
Ovalle
Application:
1st growth
stage
500 cm3/hl,
400 l/ha
directed
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Absolute Control
Crop:
Thompson
seedless
Place:
Huanilla
Ovalle
Application:
6 – 8 mm
500 cm3/hl, 600
l/ha
directed
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Crop:
Thompson
seedless
Place:
San Bernardo
R. Metropolitana
Application:
3 applic. With
growth
2,500 l/ha
ANDEVA
Ns
% calibre distribution
p>0.05
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Crop:
Red Globe
Place:
Chimbarongo
Application:
Application 14
mm
Dosage:
300 cm3/hl
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Calibre distribution (%)
Cytoplant-400 Crop
Crop:
40,0
Crimson
35,0
30,0
Place:
Vicuña 25,0
La Serena % 20,0
15,0
10,0
Application:
5,0
14 mm
250 cm3/hl 0,0
>20 19 - 20 17.5 - 19 16 - 17.5
2,000 l/ha
Calibes en mm
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Crop:
Thompson
seedless
Place:
Malloco
Region
Metropolitana
Application:
2 & 3 growth
300 cm3/hl
1,300 & 2,000
l/ha
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
Percentage distribution of Red Globe Calibre based on Nº bunches
per category
Crop:
Red Globe
Place:
Montepatria
IV Region.
Application:
Growth.
500 cm3/hl
Dipping
29/11/06
Efficacy of CYTOPLANT-400
% No. bunches/category
80% 74,70%
70%
60% 57%
50%
40% % Yemas
Fértiles
30%
20%
10%
0%
Standard + GA3 Cytoplant400x1 +
GA3x1/2
“ CYTOPLANT-400 on
Superior Seedless in Tunisia
Study conducted by Dr. SAMIR CHEBIL.
Geographic location of the two study sites (REGUEB Region, Gov. of SIDI BOUZID, Tunisia)
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
2. Experimental device (I)
Test conducted on the Superior Seedless variety with 6 theses represented by 6
treatments. Dosage and dates are reflected in the following table:
Treatme Nº treatments Products and Doses No. applications 1st application: 2nd application:
nts 18/05/2014 28/05/2014
1 T1: Control
5 vines
Evaluation area
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
2. Experimental device (III)
23
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
2. Experimental device (IV)
24
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
3. Results and discussion:
Treatment
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
3.2 Weight of 200 berries
Weight 200 berries
Average weight 200 berries
Treatment
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
3.3 Bunch weight
Weight
Average weight grapes
Treatment
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
Yield/vine
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
Yield/vine
Tons
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
3.6 Berry colour
Green
Verde Green-yellow
Vede-Amarillo Amarillo-Verde
Yellow-green Amarillo
Yellow
100.00% 9.50%
19.10% 19.10%
90.00%
33.20%
80.00% 47.60%
57.10%
70.00%
42.85% 38.10%
60.00%
33.26% 76.20%
50.00%
40.00% 0.00%
19.10% 38.20%
30.00% 33.40%
20.00% 28.58% 38.05%
23.70% 0.00%
10.00% 14.30% 14.20% 9.50%
4.86% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00%
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
32
CYTOPLANT-400 on Superior Seedless in Tunisia
4. Conclusion