Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Opening L/C
Delivery
Arrival
Discharge
Conclusion
Market Research
A shipping agent and /or foreign forwarder (forwarding agent) will take
responsibility for the documentation and arrange for the goods to be shipped
by air, sea, rail or rail. Theses services may be carried out by the supplier’s
own export department, if they have the expertise.
Airlines, shipping lines, railway companies or haulage contractors will actual
transport the goods.
Both the importer’s and exporter’s banks will be involved in arranging
payments if a letter of credit or bill of exchange is used.
Customs and Excise officers may need to examine the goods, check import or
export licences and charge duty and /or VAT.
Review
1 General Procedures of Export and Import Transaction
2 What is export?
3 What is import?
4 Parties involved in export and import transaction
5 Specialists involved in export and import transaction
6 Basic documents needed in export and import
transaction
Business Negotiation
http://training.mofcom.gov.cn
(2)The basic conditions of an offer
撤 撤 YES
回 消
YES
发盘无效
Case 1
• [Case Description]:
• One Chinese export enterprise made a firm offer to an Italian
customer. The offer is subject to be replied before May 10th.
On May 9th the Italian customer informed the Chinese export
enterprise with express letter that the offer could be accepted.
But the express was delayed by the express deliverer. Before
the Chinese export enterprise received the express letter, they
got news that the market price for the goods was going upward.
• Question:
• What should the Chinese export enterprise do in this situation?
Case 2
• [Case Description]:
• Company C of China received an offer from Company D in Paris, France on
date July 16th, 2009: “500 metric tones of tinplate, 545 U.S. dollars per metric
ton CFR China port, shipment in August, with sight letter of credit, the offer’s
opening day is within 20 days.”
• Company C replied on date 17th “If the unit price is 500 U.S. dollars CFR
Chinese port, then we can accept 500 metric tones of tinplate, arbitration will be
claimed in China in case of a contract dispute.” Company D replied: “The
market is strong so the price can not be reduced, arbitration conditions is
acceptable and reply ASAP.” At that time tinplate prices did trend up. On 19th
Company C replied : “We’ve accepted the offer you sent on 16th and the L/C
has opened by the Bank of China, please confirm it.”But the French Company
had not identified it and returned the L/C.
• Questions:
• (1) Whether the contract was established, and why?
• (2) Whether it’s Company C’s misplay?
Case 3
• 2.Company A from Britain offered Company B from Germany,
in which Company A sold a batch of goods to Company B.
Company B replied to Company A the next morning (May 6th)
when he received the offer. When replying, Company B agreed
to accept all the terms in the offer. But Company A found that
after he sent out his offer, the price for the goods that he was
going to sell was in the rise. So he telephoned Company B on the
afternoon of May 7th, hoping to cancel the offer. On the morning
of May 8th company A received Company B’s reply.
• Question:
• According to the CISG, is there any business relation between
Company A and Company B?
Case 4
• The offer made by a Chinese company to Company
A was subject to Company A’s reply by April 10th.
On April 9th, Company A made his reply to the
Chinese company to accept the offer by express mail.
Because of the delay of the transfer, the Chinese
company received the acceptance on April 11th.
Before the Chinese company received the acceptance,
they had got the news that the price of the goods
would go upward.
• Question:
• What should the Chinese company do in this case?
3. Counter-Offer
A reply to an offer which purports to be an
acceptance but contains additions, limitations
or other modifications is a rejection of the
offer and constitutes a counter offer.
(1) A reply to an offer which alter the terms of
the offer materially constitutes a counter-offer
(2) An acceptance with restrictive conditions is
another form of counter-offer, such as
“subject to our final confirmation”.
(3) If offeree accepts the original offer after he
made a counter-offer, the contract is invalid.
4. Acceptance
What is an acceptance
• An acceptance or a confirmation
is an unreserved assent of the
buyers or the sellers, who after
mutual negotiations are willing to
enter into a contract in accordance
with terms and conditions agreed
upon.
In light of the usual practice in foreign
trade, an acceptance should abide by the
following requirements:
• An acceptance must be absolute(完全地) and
unconditional.
• An acceptance can be made by an act performed
by an offeree.
• An acceptance must be clearly expressed by the
offeree’s verbal or written statement.
• An acceptance must be made by offeree within
the valid period of a firm offer.
In conclusion:
• 1. It must be absolute and unconditional.
• 2. It can be made by an offeree’s act.
• 3. It must be clearly expressed by an
offeree’s verbal or written statement.
• 4. It must be made by offeree within the
valid period of a firm offer.
Questions
1. What are the essential conditions of an offer?
2. According to the regulation of "convention",
when the offer can be withdrawal and revoked?
3. When an offer is terminated?
4. Try to analyze the effectiveness of a late
acceptance.
5. What are the essential conditions of a
contract established?
Summary: NEGOTIATION OF CONTRACT
• ①询盘(Inquiry)
• ②发盘(Offer)
• 递盘(Bid)
•
•
buyer ③还盘(Counter-offer) seller
•
• 接受(Acceptance)
• 订立合同(Sign a contract)
合同成立的时间
(Effective time of contract) 合同的形式
合同生效的要件 (Forms of contract )
( Effective conditions 合同的内容
of contract) (Contents of contract)
Contracts for the International Sale of
Goods
Review
What is an Enquiry?
What is an Offer?
What is an acceptance?
What are the two indispensable links for
reaching an agreement of contract?
Main Point in this Unit
Section One Definition of Contract(合同的定义)
约首,约文,约尾
Preface of a Treaty, Text of a Treaty,
End of a Treaty
CISG Article 11: A contract of sale need
not be concluded in or evidenced by
writing and is not subject to any other
requirement as to form. It may be
proved by any means, including
witnesses.
销售合同无须以书面订立或书面证明,
在形式方面也不受任何其它条件的限制。
销售合同可以用包括人证在内的任何方
法证明。
Various Formats of Contract In
Written
• Contract
• Confirmation
• Agreement
• Memorandum
• Letter of Intent
• Order
(http://222.200.98.43/trade)
THE LAWS ARE APPLICABLE TO
INTERNATIONAL SALES CONTRACTS
◆International Trade Practice
☆International Rules for the Interpretation
of Trade Terms《国际贸易术语解释通则》
☆Uniform Customs and Practice for
Documentary Credit《跟单信用证统一惯例》
◆International Treaty
☆ Unite Nations Convention on Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods《联合国国际货物销售合同
公约》
◆Domestic Laws
☆ Contract law《中华人民共和国合同法》
Modification or Termination of
Contract
• CISG Article 29:
• (1) A contract may be modified or terminated by the
mere agreement of the parties. (2) A contract in writing
which contains
• a provision requiring any modification or termination by
agreement to be in writing may not be otherwise
modified or terminated by agreement. However, a party
may be precluded by his conduct from asserting such a
provision to the extent that the other party has relied on
that conduct.
Name of commodity
Quality
Quantity
Package
Price
Body
Payment
Transport and insurance
The time limit and place
of performance
The prevention and
handling of dispute
NAME OF COMMODITY
Method of packing
Packing mark
Packing charges
PACKING MATERIAL
• Single packing
• Set packing
• Generally, choose set packing
SPECIFICATION OF PACKING
PACKING CHARGES
争议的预防与处理
品 质
• 一般要写明商品的名称与具
体品质。 规定机动幅度
品质 正确运用各种表示法
根据实际能力制定
包装材料
包装方式
包 包装规格
装
包装标志
包装费用
争议的预防与处理
商品检验 不可抗力 仲裁
Summary
• This chapter has mainly introduced the
general procedures of business negotiation,
the basic contents and establishment of
contract, etc.
• Key point of this chapter: offer, acceptance
• Difficult point: the explanation of offer and
acceptance in “convention”.
• About the sample contract, please read the
text book P47-75
Exercise
3 Case Study
Case Study
• Company Y is to sell a certain number of sea food products: shrimp,
while Company W is an importer from Poland. On June 15th, 2009,
Company Y made a firm offer to Company W as follows: Sea food
of shrimp 100 tons, prompt shipment, irrevocable letter of credit at
sight payment at US$ 5 000 per ton CIF Rotterdam, the offer is valid
by June 23rd, 2009 by fax. Company W on June 20th, 2009 replied
as follows: Your offer on June 15th, 2009 was accepted with 100
tons of shrimp, prompt shipment, irrevocable letter of credit at sight
payment at US$ 5 000 per ton CIF Rotterdam, apart from the usual
shipping documents, certificate of origin, phytosanitary certificates, a
good maritime transport packaging are all requested. Company Y on
June 22nd replied as follows: We regret to tell you that due to price
changes in world market we have the goods sold before our
receiving your fax on 20th. The two sides regarded to the dispute that
whether the contract was set up.
• Question:
• Was the contract effectively set up? Why?
Case Study
• In 2009, some import and export company sold a batch of non-food
corn to a Brazil company. The contract stipulated: Quality as the
marketable quality, with 98% of purity as the standard, impurity
less than 2%, shipment by marine transport, payment by D/A
payable by draft at usance in order to give the buyer a certain degree
of financial intermediation. Two months later when the goods
arrived at the destination, the buyer had the goods inspected by
inspection authorities, which showed that the quality of the received
goods was inferior to the quality as to which the contract was made
and took excessive aflatoxin in the corn as an excuse to refuse to pick
up the goods. After investigation, the survey showed that the original
quality of the goods would not influence the sales of the corn. The
real reason why the buyer breached the contract was that the market
price for corn during that time was declining. Through several
negotiations, the seller agreed to cut down the price by 30% so as to
conclude the business.
• Question: What can we learn from the case? 22
Case 1
[Case Description]:
• Company A signs up a business contract with Company B, in which
there is a stipulation: “Company A must reply within 7 days after
receiving Company B’s order. If Company A can not reply within 7
days, then it is deemed to have accepted the order.” On March 10th,
Company A received an order for 500 metric tons of first grade rice
from Company B. But on April 5, Company A notified Company B
that Company A is not able to supply the 500 metric tons of first
grade rice. Company B lodged objections because he thinks that the
contract has already been set up. If Company A fails to fulfill the
obligations, it should pay for damages to Company B.
• Question:
• Can the contract between Company A and Company B be set up?
Why?
Case 2
• A Chinese export company exported 3 000 tons of walnuts on the basis of
a CIF Avon moth to a British importer. Walnut is a best-selling Christmas
goods in Europe, so the United Kingdom importer required to ensure the
walnut arrival two weeks before Christmas, the two sides provided in the
contract that: The purchaser was required to open an L/C by the end of
August and the seller to ensure the goods arrive at the port of destination on
November 15th, otherwise, the buyer was entitled to cancel the contract.
• On receiving the L/C from the buyer, the seller delivered the goods by a
chartered vessel in early September. Thanks to the fact that the Suez Canal
was blocked at that time, the vessel had to bypass the Cape of Good Hope.
When the ship arrived at the Cape of Good Hope, the mainframe was out of
order. With a tugboat the vessel was towed to Avonmoth port and it was a
few days late; the goods were rejected by the British importer and had to be
sold locally, which resulted in a total loss of more than 70 million dollars for
the Chinese exporter.
• Question:
• Why did this event happen? How should we avoid it? Whether the
contract is also a CIF contract, and why?
Case 3
• A Chinese company A received an offer from a foreign Company B on July
6th: “500 tons of malleable iron at US$ 890 per ton CFR Chinese port for
August shipment, payable by L/C at sight. This offer is subject to your
reply reaching our end within twenty days.” On July 17th Company A
replied: “If you can reduce your price to US$ 850 per ton, we can accept
the offer. Once there are disputes, China arbitration can be accepted.” The
foreign Company B replied in the same day: “The price for malleable iron
is firm. No price cut down. The arbitration term is acceptable”. Not long
after this counter-offer, Company A also found that the price for malleable
iron was upward. So on July 19th, Company A replied to Company B:
“Your offer of July 6th can be accepted and the relative L/C has been
opened. Please confirm.” But Company B did not confirm and sent the L/C
back.
• Question:
• Can the contract set up? Why?
Case 4
• A Chinese import and export company received an offer from an Indian
company in Tehran, on May 20th, 2008: “5 000 pieces of hard-disc, 100
U.S. dollars per piece CIF China port, shipment in July, with sight letter of
credit, to be opened within 20 days”. The Chinese import and export
company replied on May 21st, 2008: “If the unit price is at USD 95 CIF
Chinese port, we can accept 5 000 pieces of the hard-disc, arbitration will
be claimed in China in case of a contract dispute.” The Indian company
replied: “As the market pricing is strong so the price can not be reduced,
arbitration conditions can be acceptable and reply ASAP.” At that time
price for hard-disc was going upward. On May 25th, 2008 the Chinese
import and export company replied: “We’ve accepted the offer you sent on
20th and the L/C has been opened with the Bank of China, please confirm
it.” But the Indian company did not identify it and returned the L/C.
• Question:
• (1) Whether the contract was established, and why?
• (2) Whether it’s our misplay?
Case 5
• A Hong Kong middleman A, invited an offer from us by fax in
respect of our products. One of our companies, on June 8th, sent an
offer and stated that the offer was open by June 15th. On date 14th,
we received a L/C opened by the U.S. company B according to all
our terms of trade, simultaneously, we received a call from
Company A: “Your offer on the 8th were transferred to the U.S.
company B.” We found after the investigation that the commodity’s
market price soared, so, we returned the letter of credit to its issuing
bank, and then sent the new price directly to the American B, while
the American B claimed that the L/C was issued within the validity
period and refused to accept the new price and asked our shipping at
the original rate, or they will sue us.
• Question:
• Is the U.S. side’s request reasonable? Why?
Case 6
• American company A sold Italian company B some corn. In the
offer, Company A listed all the transaction conditions and
pointed out: “Good Packing”. In the effective period of the offer,
Company B counter-offered by fax: “Acceptance. Goods should
be packed in new bags”. Company A began to prepare the goods
immediately when he received counter offer. Several days later,
the corn price was falling down. Company A urged company B
to open the L/C. But Company B replied: “You have not replied
to confirm our terms of packing, which should be packed in new
bags. So the contract can not be set up. We can not open the
letter of credit.”
• Question:
• What do you think of dealing with this problem? Please give
your reasons.