Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Banaag
is the unfair treatment of persons based
on bias and prejudice practiced
commonly on the grounds of age,
disability, ethnicity, origin, political
belief, race, religion, sex, etc.
DIRECT - Under similar circumstances, when a person
with a protected characteristic is treated less favorably than
others.
INDIRECT - If there is a rule or policy in the workplace
that puts you at a disadvantage as compared to others.
ASSOCIATED - If you are treated unfairly because
someone you know or are associated with has a protected
characteristic
HARRASSMENT – this comprises of unwanted behaviour
that makes another person feel offended, humiliated or
intimidated. Unwanted behaviour could include physical
gestures, abuse, jokes, spoken or written words or offensive
emails and expressions.
VICTIMISATION- Treating someone badly because they
have done a “protected act” or you believe have done a
“protected act”
Article 3 of the Labor Code of the Philippines
-“The state shall afford protection to labor, promote full employment, ensure
equal work opportunities regardless of sex, race, or creed and regulate relations between
works and employers. The state shall assure the rights of workers to self-organizarion,
collective bargaining, security of tenure and just humane conditions of work.”
Republic Act 6725
-“Art. 135. Discrimination prohibited – it shall be unlawful for any employer to
discriminate against any woman employee with respect to terms and conditions of
employment solely on account of her sex”
Section 3 of the Republic Act 9710 Magna Carta of Women
-“All individuals are equal as human beings by virtue of the inherent dignity of
each human person. No one should therefore suffer discrimination on the basis of
ethnicity, gender, age, language, sexual orientation, race, color, religion, political or other
opinion, national, social or geographical origin, disability, property, birth, or other status
as established by human rights standards.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)
This law makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of
race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. The law also requires that employers
reasonably accommodate applicants' and employees' sincerely held religious
practices, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the
employer's business.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA)
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA)
Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
As reflected by AARP:
Two out of three workers between ages 45 and 74 say
they have seen or experienced age discrimination at
work.
Job seekers over age 35 cite it as a top obstacle to
getting hired. And if one happens to work in the high-
tech or entertainment industries, chances of
experiencing age discrimination are even higher.
(Palmer, n.d.)
Bobby Dean Nickel, 64 when he lost his job, was hired by Corporate Express
in August of 2002 as a facilities manager. Staples Contract and Staples Inc.
acquired Corporate Express in 2008.
For nine years, Nickel received positive job reviews, according to his Los
Angeles Superior Court lawsuit, filed in March 2012.
Because Corporate Express’ pay scale was higher than that of employees
hired by Staples, Nickel alleged in his complaint that his mangers wanted to
discharge older, higher paid employees.
Nickel’s complaint also stated that he was a regular butt of jokes at staff
meetings and was referred to as “old coot” and “old goat.”
Nickel was fired July 29, 2011. His lawyer, Carney Shegerian, said it
represents the largest verdict of its kind in county history, topping
another in which he won $21.6 million for another client.
Bobby Nickel a 66-year-old man was awarded $26 million
by a jury that found he was discriminated against and
harassed based upon his age by his supervising managers
at Staples.
A Los Angeles Superior Court jury deliberated for parts of
Tuesday and Wednesday before finding in favor of Bobby
Nickel. The panel awarded him $3.2 million in
compensatory damages and more than $22.8 million in
punitive damages.
This law protects people who are 40 or older from
discrimination because of age. The law also makes it illegal
to retaliate against a person because the person complained
about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or
participated in an employment discrimination investigation
or lawsuit.
The law has for its avowed purposes the following:
a) promotion of employment on the basis of ability, knowledge,
skills, and qualification;
b) prohibition against arbitrary age limitations in employment;
and
c) promotion of the right of all employees and workers,
regardless of age, to be treated equally in terms of compensation,
benefits, promotion, training and other employment opportunities. The
law covers all employers, labor contractors/subcontractors, and labor
organizations.
a) Print or publish any notice of advertisement relating to
employment suggesting preferences, limitations, specifications, and
discrimination based on age;
b) Require the declaration of age or birth date during the application
process;
c) Decline any employment application because of the
individual’s age;
d) Discriminate against an individual in terms of compensation,
terms and conditions or privileges of employment on account of
age;
e) Deny promotion or opportunity for training because of age;
f) Forcibly lay off an employee or worker because of old age;
and
g) Impose early retirement on the basis of age.
10% of the total world’s population, or roughly
650 million people, live with a disability.
Only 35% of people with at least one
disability and are of working age actually
have a job. 78% of non-disabled individuals,
in comparison, do have a job.
1 in 3 employers say that they do not hire people with
disabilities because the cannot perform required job tasks.
The poverty rate for people with disabilities: 47%.
Unemployment rates in the disability community are
consistently around 80% in some countries. (Gaille, 2017)
Wage Discrepancy
According to the World Economic Forum’s Gender Gap
Report, the Philippines is currently standing on the 10th
place ahead of other 134 countries when it comes to
gender equality making it first in asia.