Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2
Learning Objectives
Become aware of factors in a company’s broad macro-
environment that may have strategic significance.
Gain command of the basic concepts and analytical tools
widely used to diagnose the attractiveness of a company’s
industry.
Become adept at mapping the market positions of key
groups of industry rivals.
Learn how to use multiple frameworks to determine
whether an industry’s outlook presents a company with
sufficiently attractive opportunities for growth and
profitability.
From Thinking Strategically about the
Company’s Situation to Choosing a Strategy
Thinking
strategically
about a firm’s
external
environment Form a
Identify Select the
strategic
promising best strategy
vision of
strategic and business
where the
options model for
firm needs
for the firm the firm
Thinking to head
strategically
about a firm’s
internal
environment
External Environment: General, Industry
and Competitor
Three External Environment include:
General (Macro)
Industry
Competitor
5
External Environment Analysis
Opportunity
General environment condition that, if exploited, helps a
company achieve strategic competitiveness
Threat
General environment condition that may hinder a company's
efforts to achieve strategic competitiveness
6
External Environment Analysis
components of the Environmental Analysis
Scanning
Identifying early signals of environmental changes and trends
Monitoring
Detecting meaning through ongoing observations of
environmental changes and trends
Forecasting
Developing projections of anticipated outcomes based on monitored
changes and trends
Assessing
Determining the timing and importance of environmental changes and
trends for firms’ strategies and their management.
7
External Environment Analysis:
The General Environment
The General (Macro) Environment
encompasses the broad environmental context in which a company’s
industry is situated and includes strategically relevant components
over which the firm has no direct control.
Grouped into 6 dimensions OR ‘environmental segments’ Each
segment composed of different elements
PESTEL Analysis: Focuses on principal components of strategic
significance in the macro-environment:
Political factors
Economic conditions (local to worldwide)
Sociocultural forces
Technological factors
Environmental factors (the natural environment)
Legal/regulatory conditions
8
The Components of Macro-Environment
Component Description
These factors include political policies and processes, including the extent to which a
government intervenes in the economy. They include such matters as tax policy, fiscal policy,
Political tariffs, the political climate, and the strength of institutions such as the Central banking
factors system. Some political factors, such as bailouts, are industry-specific. Others, such as energy
policy, affect certain types of industries (energy producers and heavy users of energy) more
than others.
Economic conditions include the general economic climate and specific factors such as
interest rates, exchange rates, the inflation rate, and the unemployment rate, the rate of
economic growth, trade deficits or surpluses, savings rates, and per capita domestic product.
Economic Economic factors also include conditions in the markets for stocks and bonds, which can
affect consumer confidence and discretionary income. Some industries, such as construction,
conditions
are particularly vulnerable to economic downturns but are positively affected by factors such
as low interest rates. Others, such as discount retailing, may benefit when general economic
conditions weaken, as consumers become more price-conscious.
Sociocultural forces include the societal values, attitudes, cultural factors, and lifestyles that
impact businesses, as well as demographic factors such as the population size, growth rate
and age distribution. Sociocultural forces vary by locale and change over time. An example is
Sociocultural the trend toward healthier lifestyles, which can shift spending toward exercise equipment
forces and health clubs and away from alcohol and snack foods. Population demographics can have
large implications for industries such as health care, where costs and service needs vary with
demographic factors such as age and income distribution.
The Components of Macro-Environment
Component Description
Technological factors include the pace of technological change and technical
developments that have the potential for wide-ranging effects on society, such
as genetic engineering and nanotechnology. They include institutions involved
Technological in creating new knowledge and controlling the use of technology, such as R&D
factors consortia, university-sponsored technology incubators, patent and copyright
laws, and government control over the Internet. Technological change can
encourage the birth of new industries, such as those based on nanotechnology,
and disrupt others, such as the recording industry.
This includes ecological and environmental forces such as weather, climate,
climate change, and associated factors like water shortages. These factors can
Environmental
directly impact industries such as insurance, farming, energy production, and
forces
tourism. They may have an indirect but substantial effect on other industries
such as transportation and utilities.
These factors include the regulations and laws with which companies must
Legal comply such as consumer laws, labor laws, antitrust laws, and occupational
and regulatory health and safety regulation. Some factors, such as banking deregulation, are
factors industry-specific. Others, such as minimum wage legislation, affect certain
types of industries (low-wage, labor-intensive industries) more than others.
External Environment:
General, Industry and Competitor
Industry Environment
Set of factors directly influencing
A firm’s competitive actions/responses
Relates to Porter’s 5 Forces Model
Competitor Environment
Competitor analysis: gather and interpret competitor
information
Gives details about
A firm’s direct and indirect competitors
The competitive dynamics expected to impact a firm's efforts to
generate above-average returns
11
Assessing the Company’s Industry and Competitive
Environment
Industry purchases Customers will be more sensitive to the price of inputs that
represent a significant have a bigger impact on their bottom line.
fraction of their cost
Customers earn low profits Input costs have a proportionally greater impact on the
profits of low-profit customers than they do on those of
high-profit customers.
Customer’s quality is not Where quality is not affected, the customer has no
substantially affected by the incentive to accept a higher-priced, higher-quality input.
industry
Industry Environment Analysis:
The Methodology of Five Forces Analysis
The Threat of Substitutes
Substitutes compete for industry profits, but from outside the industry.
One product is a substitute for another if a price increase in one
increases the quantity demanded of the other.
But even very different products may be substitutes.
Substitutes exist for almost every product.
One way to analyze the threat of substitutes is to consider the
customer’s perspective.
The most potent threats come from substitutes that offer the same
benefits at lower cost.
Factor Example/Rationale
“Closeness” of The closer the substitute, the easier it is to switch to it.
substitute
Performance / A substitute that offers slightly lower performance at a much
Price ratio of lower price is more of a threat than one that offers slightly
lower performance with only a small reduction in price.
substitute
Industry Environment Analysis:
The Methodology of Five Forces Analysis
Rivalry among Existing Competitors
Rivalry among competitors threatens the profits of
all of them, although industries can differ in the
intensity and focus of their rivalry.
Competition on price is the most threatening to
profits.
Competition on dimensions other than price—
product features, support services, delivery time, or
brand image, for instance is less likely to erode
profitability.
Industry Environment Analysis:
The Methodology of Five Forces Analysis
Factors Affecting Rivalry among Competitors
Factor Example/Rationale
Product lacks differentiation If products are not very different, rivals must
compete on price.
Fixed costs are high and Rivals have an incentive to price below average
marginal costs are low cost.
Capacity must expand in large Owners of unused capacity have an incentive to
increments cut prices.
Product is perishable Rivals have an incentive to cut price as the
product approaches the end of its saleable life.
Competitors are numerous Numerous and equal competitors reduce the
and roughly equal in size potential for tacit collusion.
Industry growth is slow Rivals must take others’ market share to grow.
Exit barriers are high High exit barriers tend to slow reduction of
industry overcapacity, which then produces price
competition.
Rivals have diverse approaches Diverse approaches reduce the potential for
collusion.
Common “Weapons” For Competing With Rivals
Competitive Weapons Primary Effects
Price discounting, clearance sales Lowers price (P), acts to boost total sales volume and market share,
lowers profit margins per unit sold when price cuts are big and/or
increases in sales volume are relatively small
Couponing, advertising items on sale Acts to increase unit sales volume and total revenues, lowers price (P),
increases unit costs (C), may lower profit margins per unit sold (P – C)
Advertising product or service Boosts buyer demand, increases product differentiation and perceived
characteristics, using ads to enhance value (V), acts to increase total sales volume and market share, may
a company’s image increase unit costs (C) and/or lower profit margins per unit sold
Innovating to improve product Acts to increase product differentiation and value (V), boosts buyer
performance and quality demand, acts to boost total sales volume, likely to increase unit costs
(C)
Introducing new or improved features, Acts to increase product differentiation and value (V), strengthens
increasing the number of styles or buyer demand, acts to boost total sales volume and market share,
models to provide greater product likely to increase unit costs (C)
selection
Increasing customization of product or Acts to increase product differentiation and value (V), increases
service switching costs, acts to boost total sales volume, often increases unit
costs (C)
Building a bigger, better dealer Broadens access to buyers, acts to boost total sales volume and market
network share, may increase unit costs (C)
Improving warranties, offering low- Acts to increase product differentiation and value (V), increases unit
interest financing costs (C), increases buyer costs to switch brands, acts to boost total
sales volume and market share
Extending Five Forces Analysis:
Addressing Cooperation and Complements
Extending Five Forces Analysis:
Addressing Cooperation and Complements
The Five Forces Framework deal with competition- Sharing of pie.
Sometimes a business will cooperate with customers or other
businesses in order to grow a market/ make the pie bigger.
Complements: products that are typically consumed together;
enhance the value of the focal firm’s products when they are used
together. Ex. Computer and software
Co-opetition: combination of cooperation and competition.
“Business is cooperation when it comes to creating a pie and competition
when it comes to dividing it up.” - Adam Brandenburger and Barry Nalebuff
Complements can have such a powerful influence on an industry that
they can be considered a “sixth force.”
Complements are everywhere and can influence the other five forces
Extending Five Forces Analysis:
Addressing Cooperation and Complements
Factors Influencing Complements
Factor Example/Rationale
Complements A dominant complementor can exert more influence on
are an industry than many smaller complementors that
concentrated compete with one another.
Relative If it is easier for users to switch across competitors than it
switching costs is across complements, complements have significant
power.
Ease of If a product and its complement are difficult to unbundle,
unbundling the complement has more influence over the product’s
customers. Ex. itunes
Influence on Content providers such as the UK’s Premier League
demand football have a powerful influence on the demand for
complementary products such as cable channels.
Asymmetric A complementor that can easily enter the product-
threats maker’s industry has more power than one that cannot.
Rate of growth Industries with low-profit growth are more likely to be
of the profit influenced by complements, as there are fewer alternatives
opportunity to grow profits.
Pankaj Ghemawat
The Value Net
both parties more competitive. Brandenburger and Barry J. Nalebuff. Used by permission of
Doubleday, an imprint of the Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, a
division of Random House LLC. All rights reserved.
The Value Net
The model helps identify the key players, so that firm can predict their behavior more accurately. It
illustrates the interdependencies between focal firm and the four other types of players:
Customers – The people who buy your product or service.
Suppliers – These provide your organization with the resources you need to produce a saleable
product. (suppliers can be outside organizations, or your own employees.)
Competitors – Competitors take a share of your target market by offering a similar product or
service.
Complementors – These are other players who provide a product or service that can be linked to
your own to make both offerings more attractive to your customers.
Encourages managers discover the potential to improve their position through cooperative as well as
competitive interactions.
Value Net Analysis- PARTS approach
Step 1: Identify Players.
Step 2: Calculate Added value.
Step 3: Define Rules.
Step 4: Identify Tactics.
Step 5: Define Scope.
Is the Collective Strength of the Five
Forces Conducive to Good Profitability
Is the state of competition in the industry stronger
than “normal”?
Can industry firms expect to earn decent profits given
prevailing competitive forces?
Are some of the competitive forces sufficiently
powerful to undermine industry profitability?
Even one powerful force (Strongest) may be enough to
make the industry unattractive in terms of its profit
potential.
Having more than one strong force means that an
industry has multiple competitive challenges with which
to cope.
Applying Industry Analysis- What
to do?
The principal application of industry analysis is in developing a
way to profit within the industry environment.
There are two ways to do this.
The first is by finding or creating an attractive environment.
The second is by developing a competitive advantage that enables
the company to be more profitable than its competitors, despite the
environment.
These two approaches are not mutually exclusive. Even
companies with a competitive advantage need to focus on the
more profitable opportunities within their environment.
“Strategy can be viewed as building defenses against the competitive forces or as finding a
position in an industry where the forces are weakest.”- Porter
Applying Industry Analysis- What to do?
When you start to think about what to do in response to your
industry analysis, bear in mind the following points:
It is possible to make good money in a tough industry. The key is to find
a way to deal effectively with the five forces.
Footnote: Circles are drawn roughly proportional to the sizes of the firms, based on revenues.
Constructing Strategic Group Maps
Assessing the Market Positions of Key Competitors
Constructing a strategic group map:
Identify the competitive characteristics that delineate strategic
approaches used in the industry. Typical variables are:
Price/quality range (high, medium, low)
Geographic coverage (local, regional, national, global)
Product-line breadth (wide, narrow)
Degree of service offered (no frills, limited, full)
Distribution channels (retail, wholesale, Internet, multiple)
Degree of vertical integration (none, partial, full)
Degree of diversification into other industries (none, some, considerable)
Plot the firms on a two-variable map using pairs of the competitive
characteristics.
Assign firms occupying about the same map location to the same
strategic group.
Draw circles around each strategic group, making the circles
proportional to the size of the group’s share of total industry sales
revenues.
Guidelines for Creating Strategic
Group Maps
Variables selected as map axes should not be highly
correlated.
Variables should reflect important (sizable) differences among
rival approaches.
Variables may be quantitative, continuous, discrete and/or
defined in terms of distinct classes and combinations.
Drawing group circles proportional to the combined sales of
firms in each group will reflect the relative sizes of each
strategic group.
Drawing maps using different pairs of variables will show the
different competitive positioning relationships present in the
industry’s structure.
Strategic Group Map
Comparative Market Positions of Producers in the Industry
Identification of Key
Success Factors
Identification of Key Success Factors
Thus the KSFs include a strong network of wholesale distributors
(to get the company’s brand stocked and favourably displayed where
beer is sold) and
clever advertising (to induce beer drinkers to buy the brand and
thereby pull beer sales through the established wholesale and retail
channels).
Because there is a potential for strong buyer power on the part of
large distributors and retail chains, competitive success depends on
some mechanism to offset that power, of which advertising (to
create demand pull) is one. Thus the KSFs also include superior
product differentiation (as in microbrews) or superior firm size and
branding capabilities (as in national brands).
The KSFs also include full utilization of brewing capacity (to keep
manufacturing costs low and offset the high advertising, branding,
and product differentiation costs).
Is the Industry Outlook Conducive to Good
Profitability?
The anticipated industry environment is fundamentally
attractive if it presents a company with good opportunity
for above-average profitability.
Will your rivals see your move? Even if an action seems obvious to you,
your competitors may not recognize it. For instance, if your new product
will affect several of your rivals’ business units, it may not register as
significant to any one unit. So it may be overlooked.
Will your rival feel threatened? If your competitor can still meet its financial
goals despite your planned move, it may not feel threatened. A rival might
not think that mounting a response is worth the expense and distraction.
Will mounting a response be a priority? Your adversary has a full agenda
that would have to be curtailed to react to your move. If your rival is
already committed to plans that will occupy all its attention, it may be
reluctant to shift priorities.
Can your rival overcome organizational inertia? Many within a rival
company might resist if reacting requires major organizational changes.
Predicting Your Competitor’s Reaction
WHAT OPTIONS WILL A COMPETITOR ACTIVELY CONSIDER?
Most companies consider fewer than four responses to a competitor’s move. And
the counter action they most commonly consider is often the most obvious. For
example, they weigh the possibility of introducing a me-too product if a rival comes
out with a new offering. And they consider matching a competitor’s price change.
The lesson? There’s a good chance your adversary is seriously considering the most
obvious response to your move.