Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FA I D AT U U M M I (176090100111004)
T S AN I YA H N U R K H O L I L A H (176090100111008)
Means The rules of conduct recognized in Principles or habits with respect to right or
respect to a particular class of human wrong conduct. While morals also
actions or a particular group or culture prescribe dos and don'ts, morality is
ultimately a personal compass of right and
wrong.
Flexibility Ethics are dependent on others for Usually consistent, although can change if
definition. They tend to be consistent an individual’s beliefs change.
within a certain context, but can vary
between contexts.
Quasi-sociological science that offers solutions to the emerging moral conflicts in research,
development and utilization of biological resources
(Kepmen, 112/M/KP/X/2009)
Bioethics is a knowledge that links biology with the knowledge of human value
systems (Van Lensselear )
Bioethic is an ethical, social, legal, philosophical study related to health care and
biological sciences (Inseklopedia bioetik)
General Individual
Ethic ethic
Ethics
Specific
Social Ethic
Ethic
Environment
Ethic
KIND OF ETHICS BASED ON APPROACH
Describe moral
behavior without giving
Descriptive
good and bad
judgment.
Directing attention to
the special meaning of
Metaetical ethics
the language of ethics,
analytical philosophy
KIND OF ETHICS
Scientific
Ethics
KIND OF ETHICS
Scientific
Ethics
KIND OF ETHICS
Scientific
Ethics
WHY IS ETHICS IN RESEARCH SO IMPORTANT?
Research ethics intends to put boundaries to what is and is not
possible.
Although most research ethics developed
Malpractice records within the context of medical research,
research ethics is of crucial importance for
•Tuskegee (1932-1970), all scientific domains.
World Medical Association
study syphilis in African •Code of Ethics International
people, but not give (established in Paris in Sociological Association
Penicillin that had been 1947) •Code of Ethics and Conduct the British
found in 1943 adopted a declaration on Psychological Society
•Willowbrook (1950), the •The Oviedo Convention also sets
subject was children with
research ethics in 1964, standards for the use of the human
mental illness the Declaration of Helsinki, genome and research on human
embryos.
•Jewish hospital (1963) Finland. •UNESCO's Universal Declaration on
study immunology by Bioethics and Human Rights and the
injected cancer in elderly Council for International
people. •CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for
Biomedical Research Involving Human
•Nuremberg Code (1947) Subjects
THE IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH ETHICS
Improve the purpose of research
Increase important value in group work
Making sure that researchers are accountable
Facilitate support from the public
Improve morale and social value
THE ETHICS REVIEW PROCEDURE
Ethic
Individual Ethic Ethic
Proposal Eligibility Follow Up
evaluation Screening Review
and Audit
If necessary
PROCEDURE TO OBTAIN ETHIC APPROVAL
Protocol and EC
request from KE Secretariat Ka. KEPK-BPPK
research
institutions
Publishing review
results KE Member
(Reviewer)
Repair Suggestions
Rejected
PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH ETHICS
DO GOOD & DO NO HARM
1. obtain informed consent from potential research participants
2. minimize the risk of harm to participants
3. protect their anonymity and confidentiality
4. avoid using deceptive practices
5. give participants the right to withdraw from your research.
Ethical Issues
•Privacy & data protection
•Informed consent
•Research on human embryos and fetuses
•Dual use
•Animal research
•Research involving developing countries
•Scientific misconduct
•Environment impact
THREE TIPS TO BE MORE ETHICALLY PREPARED
1. Try to integrate ethical and societal expertise into your research
projects
More multidiscipline, more potential show up
2. Use existing codes of conduct for researchers
Gain trust by code of conduct
3. Do not hesitate to seek advice
REFERENCE
Bertens, K., 1993. Etika K. Bertens. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Brisbois, B. and Plamondon, K., 2018. The possible worlds of global health research: An ethics-focused
discourse analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 196, pp.142-149.
Schroeder, D., Cook Lucas, J., Hirsch, F., Fenet, S. and Muthuswamy, V., 2018. Ethics Dumping Case
Studies from North-South Research Collaborations.
Sullivan, L.S. and Illes, J., 2018. Ethics in published brain–computer interface research. Journal of neural
engineering, 15(1), p.013001.
Black, G.F., Davies, A., Iskander, D. and Chambers, M., 2018. Reflections on the ethics of participatory
visual methods to engage communities in global health research. Global Bioethics, 29(1), pp.22-38.
Hey, S.P., 2018. Ethical Challenges in Biomarker‐driven Drug Development. Clinical Pharmacology &
Therapeutics, 103(1), pp.23-25.
Hughes, J.C., 2018. Chaining, culture and values: ethical issues in research in middle-and low-income
countries. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 212(1), pp.9-10.
Park, H. and Hill, R.B., 2018. Development and Validation of a Short Form of the Occupational Work Ethic
Inventory. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 32(1).
Shanley, T.P., Calvin-Naylor, N.A., Divecha, R., Wartak, M.M., Blackwell, K., Davis, J.M., Ellerbeck, E.F.,
Kieburtz, K., Koziel, M.J., Luzuriaga, K. and Maddox, J., 2017. Enhancing Clinical Research
Professionals’ Training and Qualifications (ECRPTQ): Recommendations for Good Clinical Practice
(GCP) training for investigators and study coordinators. Journal of Clinical and Translational
Science, 1(1), pp.8-15.
Ravinetto, R., Tinto, H., Diro, E., Okebe, J., Mahendradhata, Y., Rijal, S., Gotuzzo, E., Lutumba, P.,
Nahum, A., De Nys, K. and Casteels, M., 2016. It is time to revise the international Good Clinical
Practices guidelines: recommendations from non-commercial North–South collaborative trials. BMJ
global health, 1(3), p.e000122.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 2009. International ethical guidelines for
epidemiological studies. In International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies.
Ridwan, E., 2013. Etika pemanfaatan hewan percobaan dalam penelitian kesehatan. J Indon Med
Assoc, 63(3), pp.112-6. No, U.U., 23. tahun 1992 tentang Kesehatan. Diperoleh dari http://www depkes.
or. id.
World Health Organization, 2000. Operational guidelines for ethics committees reviewing biomedical
research.
THANK YOU