Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
To kill everyone or
to stay in an alliance?
Explanation/Condition
● Since It’s the Hunger Games, killing others is the best and being killed by others is the
worst.
● the main goal is to kill each other in order to stay alive, so the best option is to stay awake
for both side because it has more chance to kill rather than sleep.
NORMAL CONDITION, IF YOU WERE PUT IN THE
HUNGER GAMES PLAYER A
SLEEP NOT SLEEP
RESTED KILL
SLEEP
PLAYER B
RESTED KILLED
NOT SLEEP
KILLED TIRED
KILL TIRED
WHAT HAPPENED IN HUNGER GAMES MOVIE
PLAYER A
RESTED KILL
SLEEP
PLAYER B
KILLED
RESTED
KILLED
NOT SLEEP
TIRED
KILL TIRED
Before kill each other, their goal is to kill the strongest (Katniss) so they all chose to sleep because they knew that they will
not kill each other at that time and they can take a rest.
Summary
● As what nash equilibrium explain, the optimal outcome can be achieved
when no player has an incentive to deviate from his chosen strategy and
complete their goal. Both sides can choose rather to compete or cooperate
each other
● For a simple games, nash equilibrium can be achieved. However, for
complicated games, people don’t normally choose nash equilibrium. They
choose what they think is the best for them. ( e.g. Hunger games)
Thank you