Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
• C2 3
• C3 20
• C4 37
• C5 35
• C6 5
• Total 100 lb moles/hr
Process Sequence Cont’d
• Make a split between C3 and C4
• Show this as C2, C3 / C4, C5, C6
• This called a depropanizer.
• C3 is identified as the light key.
• C4 is identified as the heavy key.
Establish Key Component Specs
• C3, light key composition in bottoms shall
be 1.0 mole %. (2.0% sales spec)
• C4, heavy key composition in the
overheads shall be 1.5 mole %. (3.0%
sales spec).
Set Up Mass Balance for Tower
Y 0.01 Eqn 1
77 + Y - X
X 0.015 Eqn 2
23 + X - Y
Mass Balance Solution
Component A B C
C2 5.0120015 -823.03103 328.18
C3 lk 4.3742477 -587.76681 248.90
C4hk 3.8201853 -367.50819 153.30
C5 4.0537542 -539.73661 169.60
C6 4.0165587 -545.39181 141.15
Feed Conditions
• Temperature of feed = 225 deg F = 107.22
deg C.
• Pressure of feed = 264.7 psia
Determine Bubble Point of Feed
Assume T, deg F = 212.5714318 T, Deg C = 100.317462
At Press = 264.7 psia
1 2 3 4 5 6
Component Moles/hr, M K = VP/264.7 K(V/L) 1+K(V/L) L=1/4 V=1-5
C2 3 5.0000 0.856 1.856 1.617 1.383
C3 lk 20 2.0000 0.342 1.342 14.900 5.100
C4 hk 37 0.9700 0.166 1.166 31.732 5.268
C5 35 0.4800 0.082 1.082 32.343 2.657
C6 5 0.2500 0.043 1.043 4.795 0.205
100.00 85.387 14.613
1-q= 0.1461312 enter no. manually value from cell P55 - Fraction Vapor In Feed
∑= 0.1461312 = 1-q
Calc Minimum Reflux Ratio by
Underwood
• See Perry VI, Chem Eng HB, Page 13-36
• Solution For Minimum Reflux Ratio By
Solving For ∑ [Alpha*xDi / (Alpha - Ø)] =
L/D min. + 1
• Ø, The Underwood Parameter, was
determined above.
Calc Minimum Reflux Ratio by
Underwood, Cont’d
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
Number of Trays
20.00 Example
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50
Reflux Ratio, L/D
Determine Feed Tray Location
Feed Tray Location By Kirbride Equation
Oil And Gas Journal, Oct. 20, 1980, P-138, by Henry Y. Mak
No theoretical trays = 19
Reflux L
Tray 19 66.868
L19
66.868 Liq fr Tray 19
V18 = 89.4324
Calc Dew Pt of Vapor Fr T19
and Liquid Comp’n Fr T19
Temp = 126.5378 °F 52.52 °C
Pressure = 264.7 psia
Comp of
Mole Frac Dew Pt. Liq fr Tray n
Ohds, V Moles/hr, V y, V Ki = VPi / PT M/K x=y/K
C2 6.52 0.0729 2.6753 2.44 0.02726
C3 lk 79.89 0.8933 1.0035 79.61 0.89022
C4hk 3.02 0.0338 0.4091 7.38 0.08252
1.0000
89.4324 89.4325 1.00000
Moles/hr, V 89.4324
Diff = 0.0001
Vapor Comp’n From Tray 18
Vapor, V19 Reflux, L L19 Comp L19 Flow Vap, V18 Vap, V18
moles/hr moles/hr mole fr moles/hr moles/hr mole frac
C2 6.52 3.52 0.0273 1.82 4.82 0.0539
C3 lk 79.89 60.67 0.8902 59.53 78.75 0.8806
C4hk 3.02 2.68 0.0825 5.52 5.86 0.0655
MW = 44.26 44.87
Preliminary Sizing
Downcomer Area (One Side), sf = 0.14 DCA = (L*7.481 / DL /60)/(7.5*TS^0.5*(DL-Dv)^0.5*SF) / %DC Flood
Active Area, AA, sf = 1.39 AA = V/3600/Dv/(((((TS*SH/TS)-4.5213)/4.3662)*DL/Dv)^0.5)*78.5/(No Valves /
Tower Area sf = 1.66 AT = AA + 2*DCA
Tower Dia, ft. = 1.45 D = (AT*3/p)^0.5
66.87 reflux
Tray 19
89.43 66.8684
14.61
Feed Tray Molal Balance
100.00 Flashing feed 74.82 Feed Tray Feed In = 241.69
Feed Out = 241.69
85.39
74.82 152.26
Tray No. 1
y = K(x)
Mole Frac Bub Pt. Vap to Tr 1
Btms, B Moles/hr, M x, B Ki = VPi / PT M*K mole frac
C3 lk 0.77 0.0100 2.6163 2.03 0.02616
C4 hk 36.66 0.4734 1.3171 48.29 0.62359
C5 35.00 0.4520 0.7162 25.07 0.32371
C6 5.00 0.0646 0.4110 2.06 0.02654
1.0000
77.4359 77.4358 1.00000
77.4359
-0.0001
Vapor Rate To Tray 1
y = K(x)
Vap to Tr 1 Vap to Tr 1 Molecular Vap to Tr 1
Btms, B mole frac Moles/hr, V1 Weight lb/hr
C3 lk 0.02616 1.96 44.10 86
C4 hk 0.62359 46.66 58.12 2,712
C5 0.32371 24.22 72.15 1,747
C6 0.02654 1.99 86.18 171
Preliminary Sizing
Downcomer Area (One Side), sf = 0.36 DCA = (L*7.481 / DL /60)/(7.5*TS^0
Active Area, AA, sf = 1.45 AA = V/3600/Dv/(((((TS*SH/TS)-4.5
Tower Area sf = 2.17 AT = AA + 2*DCA
Tower Dia, ft. = 1.66 D = (AT*3/p)^0.5
O'Connell Y = 0.2270
Drickamer Y = 0.1101
Tray Efficiency cont’d
Box A
O'Connell Tray Efficiency = 70.39% Perry VI, Fig 18-23a
Drickamer Tray Eff'y = 76.43% Drickamer Tray Eff'y = -27.3*LN(Drickamer Y / 1.81) / 100
Ludwig, Applied Process Design For Chemical Plant Design
And Petroleum Plant, Vol Ii, Gulf Publishing, Circa 1960.
Actual Trays = 26
12
11 3 ft. feed tray space
10 spcs at 1.5ft/sp
15 ft.
1
10 ft. shirt
Vessel Specs
Vessel Specs
Case Study =Bottom of Tower Example for CBE 497 Dwg No. = Example from Perry III
By = RAH Tag No. = CBE - 497
Input Data
X = (WL/WG)(RHOG/RHOL)^0.5 = 0.4984
Y = (G)^2(FP)/(gc*RHOG*RHOL) = 0.0113
At X above, Y Flooding = YF = 0.0444
% Flood At (X,Y) = (Y/YF)^0.5*100 = 50.56%
Eckert Presure Drop = 0.20 Inches H2O/ft. DP = 3.87 In. H2O
FRI Packed Tower Results For
1.5 ft. Diameter Tower
X = (WL/WG)(RHOG/RHOL)^0.5 = 0.4984
Y = (G)^2(FP)/(gc*RHOG*RHOL) = 0.0358
At X above, Y Flooding = YF = 0.0444
% Flood At (X,Y) = (Y/YF)^0.5*100 = 89.88%
Eckert Presure Drop = 1.77 Inches H2O/ft. DP = 35.14 In. H2O
FRI Detailed Method for
Designing a Packed Tower
• Select a Packing Factor from 18 selected
packing types.
• FRI have determined the design factors
which are too numerous to list here.
• FRI Packed Tower V1.2 will use this
packing data and the other data in the
shortcut method to design % Flood and
estimate the HETP.
FRI Detailed Method For PT
From New FRI Packing Correlations, Reports 92, 94, and 95, 1984 Detailed Method
Maximum Stable Or Flood Vapor Rate At Unknown HETP = 12,279 lb/hr skirt ht. = 12 ft.
% Flood = 4812 / 12279 = 39.19%
FRI HETP Values for 2 ft. Diam.
FRI Vapor And Liquid Transfer Unit Values
HETP Message = Within 20% to 80% Capacity Limits Total Height of packing = 19.42 ft.