Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
competition
1
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Imperfect competition
• An oligopoly
– an industry with a few producers
– each recognising that its own price depends
both on its own actions and those of its rivals.
• In an industry with monopolistic
competition
– there are many sellers producing products that
are close substitutes for one another
– each firm has only limited ability to influence its
output price.
2
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Market structure
Number Ability to Entry Example
of firms affect barriers
price
Perfect competition Many Nil None Fruit stall
Imperfect competition:
3
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The minimum efficient scale and market
demand
• The minimum efficient scale (mes) is the output at
which a firm’s long-run average cost curve stops falling.
• The size of the mes relative to market demand has a
strong influence on market structure.
£ LAC2
LAC3
LAC1
D
Output
4
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Monopolistic competition
• Characteristics:
– many firms
– no barriers to entry
– product differentiation
• so the firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve
– The absence of entry barriers means that profits
are competed away...
5
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Monopolistic competition (2)
MC • Firms end up in TANGENCY
£ EQUILIBRIUM, making
normal profits.
AC
• Firms do not operate at
F minimum LAC.
P1=AC1
• Price exceeds marginal cost.
• Unlike perfect competition,
the firm here is eager to sell
D more at the going market
MR price.
Q1 Output
6
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Oligopoly
• A market with a few sellers.
• The essence of an oligopolistic industry is the
need for each firm to consider how its own
actions affect the decisions of its relatively
few competitors.
• Oligopoly may be characterised by collusion
or by non-co-operation.
7
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Collusion and cartels
• COLLUSION
– an explicit or implicit agreement between existing
firms to avoid or limit competition with one
another.
• CARTEL
– is a situation in which formal agreements between
firms are legally permitted.
• e.g. OPEC
8
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Collusion is difficult if
• There are many firms in the industry
• The product is not standardised
• Demand and cost conditions are changing
rapidly
• There are no barriers to entry
• Firms have surplus capacity
9
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The kinked demand curve
Consider how a firm may
£ perceive its demand curve
under oligopoly.
P0
It can observe the current
price and output,
but must try to anticipate
rival reactions to any
price change.
Q0 Quantity
10
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The kinked demand curve (2)
The firm may expect rivals
£ to respond if it reduces
its price, as this will be seen
as an aggressive move
P0
… so demand in response
to a price reduction is likely
to be relatively inelastic.
11
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The kinked demand curve (3)
… but for a price increase
£ rivals are less likely to
react,
P0
so demand may be
relatively elastic
above P0
12
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The kinked demand curve (4)
Given this perception, the
£ firm sees that revenue will
fall whether price is increased
or decreased,
P0
13
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Game theory:
some key terms
• Game
– a situation in which intelligent decisions are
necessarily interdependent.
• Strategy
– a game plan describing how the player will act or
move in every conceivable situation.
• Dominant strategy
– where a player’s best strategy is independent of
those chosen by others.
14
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game
Consider two firms in a duopoly each with a choice of
producing ‘high’ or ‘low’ output:
Firm B output
High Low
Firm A output
High 1 1 3 0
Low 0 3 2 2
15
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
The Prisoners’ Dilemma
• Each firm has a dominant strategy to produce
high
• so they make 1 unit profit each
• but they would both be better off producing
low
– as long as they can be sure that the other firm
also produces low.
• So collusion can bring mutual benefits
• but there is incentive for each firm to cheat.
16
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
More on collusion
• The probability of cheating may be affected
by agreement or threats.
• Pre-commitment
– an arrangement, entered voluntarily, restricting
future options.
• Credible threat
– a threat which, after the fact, is optimal to carry
out.
17
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Derivation of a firm’s reaction function
£ Assuming firm B produces zero
p0 output, A faces the market demand
curve D0 and it maximises profits by
p1
setting MR0 = MC and producing
p2 QA0.
MC When B produces some positive
output, A faces the residual demand
curve D1,sets MR1 = MC and
D
MR2 MR D2 MR0 1 D0 produces QA1.
1
QB QA When firm B increases its output, A
sets MR2 = MC and produces QA2.
19
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Contestable markets
• A contestable market is characterised by free
entry and free exit
– no sunk costs
– allows hit-and-run entry
• Contestability may constrain incumbent firms
from exploiting their market power.
20
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Strategic entry deterrence
• Some entry barriers are deliberately erected
by incumbent firms:
– threat of predatory pricing
– spare capacity
– advertising and R&D
– product proliferation
• Actions that enforce sunk costs on potential
entrants
21
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Summary….
• The polar extremes of perfect competition
and monopoly are rarely encountered in
practice.
• Imperfect competition is more the norm.
• Economists used to say ‘market structure
affects conduct which affects performance’.
22
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005
Summary (cont.)
23
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005