Projects (Manufacturing)

Dinesh Sirasat

Procurement and
1. Welding Technology Project Quality
Inventory control
Tanaji Tambe & Sharad M. Sanjay Hatkar
Sharad Gite

Project-1 Logistics
2. Machine shop and CNC Technology
Pravin Supe XXXXXXXXXXX
Vikram S. & V Pagare

Utility (civil/electrical/
housekeeping etc.
4. Metal Forming and Maintenance
Farid Pathan
Rajesh Yadav Project -2
Sachin Firke
HR/attendance and
admininistration
5. Tool Room Yogesh Belgaokar
Manohar Umaraliya
 Points associated with manufacturing
No Point
1 HR, Attendance, Job summary analysis,
DPR, Salary, Contractors statement
streamlined
2 Welding quality improved, documentation,
quality procedure set
3 Resource center and job costing
4 Fun at work, Sports and cultural activities
5 Delegation of authority, Sections in Factory,
individual incharge and seprate planning
engineer
6 Set up of supply chain, Proper arrangement
in store and logistics
7 Daily report from factory
8 Planning and information to all directors
regarding procurement schedule, delivery
date and dispatch schedule
9 Implementation of scientific project
management for all project
Problems/Challenge to continue
Full time resource not available
Full time welding engineer not available
Easy to continue
Good support from management. easy to
continue
Difficult to execute as frequent decision change
from management and lack of skilled engineers
Difficult to maintain due to delays in supply chain .
No seprate resource and attrition
Stopped due to inconvenience
Multiple projects at time, frequent change in
decisions, urgency etc
Worked out for 3 months. Miserably failed due to
all the above reasons
Developed reporting formats
 Resources are finite we
Project scheduling can only optimize
 Quality Scope
Issues in Managing Production
• Doing whatever fetch money..
• No importance to quality
• Overall scope not clear
•Only 1 QC for entire factory
• Deliverables are not crystal clear
•Lack of equipments
• On job modifications
•Urgency spoils quality
• Design in office not on shop floor
•Urgency increases rework
• High level of rework
•Manipulation approach spoils quality
•Follow “ Do it right first time”

One manipulation
require correction
at 10 other locations

Time Cost
• 0 % OTD
• Not single commitment is satisfied • Wrong ways to save cost
•70 % regular+30 % urgent is accepted • Too much importance to cost
•Everything can not be urgent saving compared to others,
•No priority setting create imbalance
•Supply chain analysis
•Manufacturing resources are not infinite,
It will take time to execute
 10 Areas of Factory Project Management
Not necessary to do everything. Focused approach. Very
Scope Not clear. very clear priorities

Time Urgency, Frequent changes in planning and

decisions
Everything can not be urgent. 70/30

Cost Too much importance Realistic cost management without manipulation

Quality Very low priority Reduce manipulation. Quality will improve

Performance driven, Proper documentation, continuous

HR No policy. Job roles interchangeable.
Attrition. improvement

No clear path of communication. Too many Delegation of authority, Trust on officers and zero
Communication bosses. Director talking to safaiwala and
security guard
interference (except emergency)

No specialization. Do not try to do

Integration everything. Others are getting paid for there
job. Leaders giving conflicting decision
Seprate project manager for integration (not interference)

Improve communication across divisions, Understanding

Procurement Weak supply chain problem of others and plan

Risk No safety Measure at all Health, hygiene and safety

Avoid personal conflicts, at least do not spread. Maintain

Stakeholder Personal conflicts
good image
 Summary
•Reduce manipulations
•Improve communication
•Less ideas- more realisation
• finite resource-maximum profit- optimize
•Priority setting
•Organisation should be process oriented than person oriented
•More about people than assets and investment