Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MINITAB
6 PANEL
Pareto Chart
F test
Histogram
EXAMPLE 1
• A car manufacturing company learns that the number of dents and
dings on the doors have increased exponentially. They want to
determine the root causes for the formation of dents and dings.
• It is very tough to list down all the causes in a haphazard manner for
analysis.
• How to proceed?
CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM
• Cause and effect diagram was introduced by Ishikawa
• It is also called as Ishikawa Diagram.
• The causes are categorized under 6M’s
1. Men
2. Material
3. Machine
4. Method
5. Measurement
6. Mother Nature
•
Fill in the sub-
causes under each
sub-heading by
clicking the
corresponding cell.
CONTROL CHARTS
• A control chart is a graph that represents the data taken over time
and the variations in the data
• It can help in monitoring the stability of the process
• It can help in determining whether the process needs any
improvement
• There are two types of variations:
• Assignable causes of variations: These variations are larger in
magnitude and can be easily traced
• Chance Cause of Variation: These variations are inevitable in any
process.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF CONTROL CHARTS
These will be explained
further
CONTROL CHARTS
RANGE STANDARD
DEVIATION P CHART NP CHART C CHART U CHART
CHARTS
CHARTS
0.150 UCL=0.1516
0.125
Proportion
0.100 _
P=0.0957
0.075
0.050
LCL=0.0397
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21
Sample
Tests are performed with unequal sample sizes.
• In p-chart, The proportion of defectives in each sample is studied to
determine whether the process is in control or out of control.
• An in-control represents only random variation in proportion
• An out of control represents non-random variation in proportion of
samples which might be due to special causes.
• In the above scenario, the telephone data did not fail in any of the
tests therefore the process is in-control.
EXAMPLE 3
• A manufacturer of light bulbs wants to assess whether or not its
process is in control. samples of light bulbs were taken every hour for
three shifts (24 samples of 500 light bulbs) and tested to see whether
or not they light. Defects are light bulbs that do not work.
• How do we test?
• Using NP chart, we need to determine the number of defects in each
sample to see the nature of the process.
Number of defective
bulbs on an hourly basis.
This point
NP Chart of Defectives exceeded 3 Sigma
Level, hence there
18 1 is a lack of control
in process
16
UCL=14.75
14
12
Sample Count
10
8 __
NP=6.92
6
50
Sample Count
40
_
C=36.68
30
20
LCL=18.51
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Sample
• The 2 points have exceeded the 3 sigma level. Hence we need to
analyze the reasons behind those defects in the sample and only if we
avoid those defects, the overall process can be deemed as statistically
in-control process.
EXAMPLE 5
• A stenographic company wants to assess the quality of its
transcription service. They sampled 25 samples (sets of pages) and
counted the number of typographical errors for each sample.
Differently sized sets of pages were sampled. Typographical errors are
defects.
• How to analyze this issue?
• Because the samples are not the same size, a U chart can be used to
asses the number of defects per unit measurement and to see if the
process is under control
Number of typographical
errors for each sample.
The points highlighted have
U Chart of Defects exceeded 3 Sigma Level,
1 hence there is a lack of
0.6 1 control in process
UCL=0.5308
0.5
Sample Count Per Unit
0.4
0.3
_
U=0.2380
0.2
0.1
0.0 LCL=0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Sample
Tests are performed with unequal sample sizes.
• From the graph, it is seen that sample 6 and sample 18 have
exceeded the 3 sigma level for that samples.
• These results indicate that the process is unstable and that the factors
causing this variation should be identified and corrected.
EXAMPLE 6
• A clothing manufacturer has had numerous returns due to various
quality complaints. The manufacturer wants to correct the problems
but isn't sure where to begin. They decide to track the number and
type of defects in their clothing line. Identifying the sources of their
most common problems will help them to target their improvement
efforts.
• How to do this?
• With the help of pareto analysis, it is possible to identify the most
common problems.
Data regarding the causes
for numerous returns to
the manufacturer
These 3 causes
contribute to 80% of
the problems.
EXAMPLE 7
• A research team at a fitness assessment company is looking for a
method to predict a person's body fat percentage. This health
measure is difficult and expensive to measure directly. In its model,
the team wants to include a predictor variable that is easier to
measure, and is considering the use of Body Mass Index (BMI).
• How to measure the body fat percentage?
• We can use scatter plot to measure the same.
Data set for BMI and percentage of fat.
SCATTER DIAGRAM INTERPRETATION
Scatterplot of %Fat vs BMI
50
45
40
35
%Fat
30
25
20
15
15 20 25 30 35
BMI
RESULTS
• The scatterplot for the BMI and fat data shows a strong positive and
linear relationship between the two variables. Body Mass Index (BMI)
may be a good predictor of body fat percentage.
EXAMPLE 8
• A potato chip manufacturer is studying the problem of broken potato
chips. As part of the initial investigation, the manufacturer randomly
samples 100 packages and counts the number of broken chips per
package.
• How can he interpret the data?
• This can be done using a histogram.
Histogram of Broken chips
Normal
25 Mean 9.2
StDev 1.990
N 100
20
15
Frequency
10
0
4 6 8 10 12 14
Broken chips
STATISTICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING
• In the upcoming slides, the results obtained are purely based on
statistical calculations
• The common tests are Z test, T test and F Test
EXAMPLE 9
• A dietician selects a random sample of 13 bottles of cooking oil to
determine if the mean percentage of saturated fat is different from
the advertised 15%. Previous research indicates that the population
standard deviation is 2.6%
• How to proceed?
Z-TEST
• The Z-confidence interval and test procedures are used to make
inferences about a population mean (m ), based on the mean of a
random sample.
Fat content in Oil.
The confidence interval is a range of likely values for m . Since you do not
know the true value of μ , the confidence interval allows you to guess its
value based on the sample data. The sample mean provides an estimate
of μ, and s is used to determine how far off the estimate might be.
This interval tells you that, based on the sample mean and the
known value of s , you can be 95% confident that μ is greater
than or equal to 15.1866 and less than or equal to 18.0134.
3.0
2.5
2.0
Frequency
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 _
X
Ho
12 14 16 18 20
Fat Content
EXAMPLE 10
• A health management firm has samples of satisfaction ratings from
former patients of two hospitals, and wants to know if one is rated
more highly than the other. The information will be used to refer
patients and to make suggestions for hospital improvement.
• The variances of the two samples were found to be sufficiently
similar, so a pooled standard deviation will be used for the test.
T TEST
• The two-sample t-confidence interval and test procedures are used to
make inferences about the difference between two population means
(μ A and μ B ), based on data from two independent, random
samples.
Satisfaction rating by patients from 2 different hospitals
90 The medians for each sample are very similar to the means.
80
60
The spread of the data appears to be about the same for both
50 samples, except that sample B has a slightly longer upper tail
40
than sample A.
30
A B
EXAMPLE 11
• A recent study compared drivers on two types of roads. Each driver
drove on one of two road types: first class road (1) and dirt road (2).
As a measure of driving performance, testers recorded the number of
steering corrections each driver made on each type of road. You want
to test if the drivers' performances were equally variable across the
two road conditions.
• How to analyze this?
VARIANCE TEST
• The Two Variances confidence interval and test procedures are used
to make inferences about the equality of the standard deviations and
variances between two populations based on data from two
independent, random samples.
Number of steering corrections
made by the driver on the two
road conditions.
For the driving data, the high p-values for both tests (0.640 and
0.680) indicate that the standard deviations are not different.
Histogram of Corrects
1
3
2
The histogram shows that the number of corrections for the first class
1
road (1) was smaller than the number of corrections for the dirt road
Frequency
0
2
(2). The variability between groups appears approximately equal. The
3
data for first class roads may be skewed to the right.
2
0
5 10 15 20 25
Corrects
Panel variable: RoadType
SUMMARY
• Minitab is an user friendly software used for extensive statistical
analysis.
• It is used in major six sigma projects to analyze the data and give an
insight into the potential problem
• There are various tools in Minitab such as Scatter plot, Pareto
Analysis, Histogram, Cause and effect matrix, Control Chart.
• Majority of the tools are under the “ Stat” option in the tool bar.
THANK YOU