Transaksi Jaminan yang tidak

didaftarkan: Lien
 Unregistered secured transaction by way of
deposit of IDT /duplicate lease to lender
which is noted on the register with a lien-
holder’s caveat.

s.281(1b)
Entry of the lien-holder’s caveat entitled the
caveator (lender with custody of the IDT) lien
over the land or lease
 The lien holder obtains judgment debt order:
applies to Court for OFS

s.281(3)
Application according to civil procedure rules
Order 83
S.257-259 and s.266-269 applies mutatis
mutandis
As chargee applies under s.256
 Lien holder produces the IDT at Registry
/Land Office upon written request of
proprietor or lessee within a reasonable
period for any purpose its required under the
NLC

s.281(5)
Costs incurred by lien-holder to comply with
the request is payable by the proprietor
/lessee on demand.
 The provisions of sub-sections (20-(5) applies
to all liens whether created before or after
the commencement of the NLC.

 S.330: Creation & effect of lien-

holder’s caveat
 (1) Person deposited with IDT as
security for a loan may apply to R for
entry of a lien-holder’s caveat.
s.330(3): Procedure R follows upon receipt of lien-
holder ‘s caveat application
s.330(b)
Serve Form 19A on proprietor/lessee
s.330(4); endorsement on the RDT “CAVEAT
(LIEN)”
(a) Caveat binds land/ lease
(b) Person on whose application it was entered
(c) Time it became effective
(d) Reference under which the application is filed
 Lien-holder’s caveat has the like effect as
s.322(2)-(5) = PRIVATE CAVEAT

 References to the caveator in subsections (2)-

(5) for whose benefit the caveat was entered
is the same reference to lien-holder.

 Sub-sections (6) and (7) of s.322 applies in

relation to lien-holder’s caveat
1. Ditarikbalik kaveator
2. Pendaftaran sijil jualan
3. Pembatalan oleh R atas bukti jumlah wang
yang genap masa dibawah lien telah dibayar
4. Mahkamah arahkan R membatalkan kaveat
[M berpuashati KPL tidak patut
dimasukkan]
 MT Perak: Land Code 1926 s.134
 Perjanjian tuanpunya bersama - pecah bahagi.
Kaveat atas bahagian yang tidak dibahagikan.
Hakmilik baru dikeluarkan selepas pecah bahagi.
 PERMOHONAN SEORANG TUANPUNYA
BERSAMA UNTUK PENGELUARAN KAVEAT.
 Samada kaveat pemegang lien kehilangan
haknya apabila menyerahkan IDT KPD Pejabat
Tanah untuk pendaftaran pecah sempadan?
 SLS Chettiappa - lien kpd R & depositkan IDT
utk bahagiannya yg tidak berbahagi sebagai
jaminan pinjamannya.

 Hutang kpd R belum dibayar. R ambil

prosiding menguatkuasakan liennya.
 Persoalan:
 Jika Pemegang Lien mengeluarkan KPL s.175
akan menghalang beliau memasukkan kaveat
lain (KEDUA) bagi hal yang sama di atas
tanah yang sama.

Grant
13272
Pemohon: R kehilangan liennya kerana serah pd
Pejabat Pendaftar.

M:
The lien may not be lost where the possession is
no longer retained, in cases where some
intention other than of giving up the lien . . .
property delivered to the owner for some
particular purpose on an undertaking by the
owner that he will return it.
  Jelas niat R menyerahkan IDT untuk
membolehkan Pendaftar melaksanakan
pecahbahagi and tiada petunjuk bahawa tindakan
tersebut R telah menghilangkan lien tersebut.
 IN this case the caveat is still in force and the
fact that the Resp is no longer in physica;
possession of part of the title for the land over
which the lien is created is not, under the
circumstances in which the Resp lost possession
of the title, evidence that lien has ceased to
exist.
 In my opinion therefore the lien created under
the provisions of s.134 of the Land Code is not
necessarily destroyed when the lien-holder
loses possession of the title nor do I think that
the circumstances under which that possession
was lost prove an intention on the part of the
Respondent to abandon his lien.
 Per Hereford J
 1. Deposit IDT/pajakan pendua kepada
pemiutang sebagai sekuriti pinjaman

 ORMORM Manickavasagam Chetty v TJ

McGregor [1933] 2 MLJ 295
 Paramoo v Zeno [1968] 2 MLJ 230 FC

 Isu Rayuan:
 Cagaran tidak berkuatkuasa maka lien juga
tidak berkuatkuasa.
 Lien tidak memenuhi UU kerana tiada niat
untuk mewujudkan lien s.134 Land Code.
 Kaveat yang dimasukkan tidak
menyatakan keadaaan kepentingan tanah
yang dikaveatkan – s.167
 Diputuskan
 KTN jelas cagaran BERBEZA dpd lien.
 Lien adalah lien statutori, wujud secara bebas dpd cagaran. Jika
cagaran tidak diwujudkan kerana tidak menepati UU, lien tidak
‘dilepaskan’ (avoided)
asalkan ianya menepati UU.

TIDAK DINAFIKAN PL GAGAL MENDAFTARKAN

CAGARAN DIBWH LAND CODE, NAMUN TUNTUTAN
BERLANDASKAN LIEN.
 Diputuskan

 Perjanjian jelas menunjukkan NIAT mewujudkan suatu lien.

 Pemeriksaan kaveat menunjukkan keadaan kepentingan dalam
tanah yang dikaveatkan di mana tuntutan diasaskan.
 Ms.232 laporan.
 Heap Huat Rubber Co Sdn Bhd v UOB Ltd
[1992] 3 CLJ 1587