Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
By Jimmy Wang
University of Petroleum,China
Content
Purpose
C. feature
a. cannot carry any wellhead equipment
b. can be driven into the ground with a pile
driver.
(2) Conductor pipe
A. Functions
from 18 5/8 in to 30 in
C. Setting depth
from the surface to some shallow depth
D.Features
D. Feature
A. Functions
a to seal off a severe-loss zones;
b to protect problem formations,such as
salt sections or caving shales;
c to prevent communication behind the
casing between the lower hydrocarbon
zones and upper water formations.
B. Size
the most common size is 9 5/8 in
C. Setting depth
usually set in the transition zone below or above an
over-pressured zone
D. Feature
a good cementation of the casing must be ensured
b multistage cementing may be used to cement long
strings of intermediate casing
(4) Production casing
A. Functions
a to isolate producing zones;
b to provide reservoir fluid control
c to permit selective production in mutizone
production.
B. Size
the normal size is 7 in
C. Feature
a the last casing string;
b the well will be completed through the
string.
(4) Liner casing
A. Introduction of liner casing
a not to reach the surface;
b hung on the intermediate casing
B. Setting depths
set at the bottom and hung from the intermediate casing
C. Advantages:
a total costs of the production string is reduced;
b running and cementing times is reduced ;
c the length of reduced diameter is reduced.
D Disadvantages:
a possible leak across a liner hanger;
b difficulty in obtaining a good primary cementation due
to the annulus between the liner and the hole.
section 3 Strength properties
Strength
properties
Casing strength properties are normally
specified as:
O Elongation
Load-elongation graph
(1) O-A-B
This part is a straight line and can be called as the
“elastic range”.
Hooke’s law is only applicable to this portion:
σ=Eε (3-1)
Where σ=applied stress=load/cross-section area
E = Young’s modulus
ε=deformation=elongation/original length
Strength
properties
Note:
① when quoting the strength of the casing, it is
customary to use the yield strength of casing.
② API define the yield strength as the tensile stress
required to produce a total elongation of 0.5% of the
gauge length.
(3) Axial tension
Strength
properties
2E 1
Pc bar
1 2 2 (3-4)
Strength
DD
properties
1
t t
Where E: Young’s modulus of steel;
ν: Poisson’s ratio;
t: casing thickness;
D: the outside diameter of casing
In Imperial units, E=30×106psi and ν=0.3; hence the
equation (3-4) simplifies to
46.95 106
Pc 2
psi (3-5)
DD
1
t t
In metric units, the equation (3-4) becomes
Strength
2.198 10 6
Pc
properties
2
bar (3-6)
DD
1
t t
(4) Plastic collapse
A
Strength
Pp Y B C (3-7)
D/t
properties
Strength
F
PT Y G psi
properties
(3-8)
D/t
2Yt
Pbr 0.875 (3-9)
D
The coefficient 0.875 can be deduced if the imperial
units are used in the above equation.
Example
Compute the burst-pressure rating for 20-in,K-55
Strength
properties casing with a normal wall thickness of 0.635 in
and a normal weight per foot of 133 lb/ft.
Solution
The burst-pressure rating is computed by use of the
above equation.
Pbr=0.875×2×55000×0.635÷20=3056 psi
Rounded to the nearest 10psi, this value becomes
3060psi. This burst-pressure rating corresponds to the
minimum expected internal pressure at which permanent
pipe deformation could take place, if the pipe is subjected
to no external pressure or axial loads.
E. The types of liner
Different depths
Different pressure
Economy
Different diameter
and wall thickness
2 Weight per unit length
Casing
specification
A tensile force
D Compression load
(a) Originate when casings carry inner strings.
(b) Since production casings don not carry inner strings,
they don’t develop any compression load.
E Other loadings Casing
design
(a) bending with tongs during make-up;
(b) pull-up of the joint and slip crushing
(c) corrosion and fatigue failure of the body and
threads;
(d) pipe wear due to running wire line tools and
string assembly;
(e) additional loadings strings treatment operations
such as squeeze-cementing ,acidising and hydraulic
fractures.
Casing
design
F Conclusions
(a) Only tensile force, collapse pressure,burst pressure
and compression load will be considered in the design.
(b) Other loadings,with the exception of (e) cannot be
determined directly and be accounted for through the
use of “safety factors”.
Casing
2 Safety factors design
Casing
design
4 Biaxial effects Casing
design
(1) Concept
The combination of stress due to the weight of the
casing and external pressure are referred to the
“Biaxial stresses”.
(2) The ellipse of plasticity
Holmquist and Nadia in 1939 give the equation
about the relationship for the effect of axial stress on
collapse or burst .
( t r )2 ( r t )2 ( z r )2 2 yield (5-2)
Casing
design
Casing
design
Conclusion
external pressure=CSD×Gm
internal pressure=Pf-(TD-CSD)G
burst = internal pressure - external pressure
= Pf-(TD-CSD)G - CSD×Gm (5-5)
b at the surface
external pressure=0
internal pressure=Pf-TD × G
burst = Pf-TD × G (5-6)
Joint type: LTC for K55, 54.5 lb/ft and BTS for remaining grades.
Solution
Casing
(1) Collapse design
1950
=1.7
(2500*67/144)
=1069*1000/406373=2.6 design
Casing
design
(4) Buoyancy
Consider a cylinder of 1m (or 1ft) in length, of density
ρs ,which is fully immersed in a fluid of density of ρm, of
outside diameter do and inside diameter of di .
A
Air weight of cylinder =
4
d 2
o
d i2 1 m g
or Wa=As ρs g (5-7)
Casing B
design Buoyancy force of cylinder=
4
d 2
o
d i2 1 m g
or Wm=As ρm g (5-8)
C Casing
design
the effective or buoyant weight of the casing
WB =Wa-Wm
=Wa(1 - ρm / ρs )
=Wa×BF
(5-9)
where BF = (1 - ρm / ρs) and is called buoyancy factor.
Casing
Example 2 design
During the pure bending, the upper surface stretches and is in tension,
while the lower surface shortens and is in compression .
NA (neutral axis): a surface exists between the compressed and
stretched surfaces and has no longitudinal deformation.
HJ at a distance y from NA and has the same length as KL at the NA.
After bending the surface HJ deforms to an arc of radius R and included
angle dθ.
FB=63DWN θ lb (5-19)
B metric units
FB=63DWN θ lb (5-20)
(6) Shock loads Casing
design
Casing
design
Casing
Casing Design Example design
Casing program:
20 in(508 mm) casing to be set at 350 ft (107 m)
133/8in(339.7 mm) casing to be set at 6200 ft (1890 m)
91/8in(244.5 mm) casing to be set at 10 400 ft (3170 m)
7 in (177.8 mm) casing to be set at 13 900 ft (4237 m)
The casing head housing will be installed on the 20 in
casing. The 7 in casing will be run to the surface.
Casing
Mud programme: design
Down to 350 ft (107 m),
mud weight is 65 pcf (1.041 kg/l)
Down to 6200 ft (1890 m),
Safety factors:
Burst = 1.1
Collapse = 0.85
Tension = 1.8
Formation fluid gradient:
0-6200 ft (1890 m), Pf= 0.465 psi/ft (0.105 bar/m)
6200-10 400 ft (3170 m),Pf= 0.48 psi/ft (0.1086 bar/m)
10 400-13 900 ft (4237 m), Pf= 0.57 psi/ft (0.1289 bar/m)
Casing
design
Casing
Burst design
Formation pressure from next TD= 10 400×0.48
= 4992 psi (344 bar)
(see Figure 10.13).
Burst at shoe = internal pressure- external pressure
Casing
design Note that yield strength values are obtained from the given
Table as the lowest value of either the body or coupling
yield strength.
The safety factor must, at least, be equal to the required
value of 1.8 if any of the selected grades is to satisfy the
criterion of tension. The table overleaf produces values of
SF of greater than 1.8, which indicates that the grades
satisfy collapse, burst and tension.
Pressure testing After the casing is landed and cemented, it
is the practice to test the casing prior to drilling the
casing shoe. The testing pressure employed by some operating
companies is 60% of the burst rating of the weakest grade of
casing in the string.Hence,testing pressure of 133 in
= 60% x burst pressure of K55, 68//
= 60% x 3450
= 2070 psi (143 bars)
During pressure testing an extra tensile force is exerted on
Casing the casing and the SF should, again, be > 1.8 for the top
joint (or the joint of weakest grade). Hence,total tensile
design force during pressure testing at top joint
= buoyant weight of casing
+ tensile force due to pressure testing
=weight in air×BF + (π/4) (ID)2×testing pressure
BF=(1-ρm/ ρs)=1-67/489.5=0.863
From the given table we can get the inside diameter of L80,
72# as 12.347 in (313.6 mm).
Therefore,
total tensile force = (439.2 x 0.863) ×1000
+ (π/4) (12.347)2 × 2070
= 379 030 + 247 847
Casing
= 626 877 lb
design
SF in tension for top joint = 1 661 000/ 626 877
=2.65
Biaxial effects Check the weakest grade of selected
casing for biaxial effects as follows.
Tensile ratio = weight carried by weakest joint÷
yield strength of body (or coupling)
Weakest grade selected is the K55, 68#, having a body yield
strength of 1 069 000 lb and a coupling strength(LTC) of
835000 lb.
Hence,
Casing tensile ratio =266.4×1000/835000=0.319
design
For a tensile ratio of 0.319, Table 10.8 shows
that the collapse resistance of the casing is
reduced to approximately 80% of its original
(under zero load) value.Hence, collapse resistance
of K55, 68# = 0.8×1950
under biaxial loading = 1560 psi(108 bars)
Collapse pressure due to mud at 2400 ft (i.e. top
joint of grade of the K55, 68#)
=67×2400/144=1117 psi(77bars)
Therefore,
SF in collapse for top joint of K55, 68#
=collapse resistance÷ collapse pressure
=1560/1117
Casing =1.4
design Final selection
Depth Grade and weight
0-2400 ft (732 m) L80, 72#(107 kg/m)
24004200 ft (1280 m) K55, 68#(101 kg/m)
4200-6200 ft (1890 m) L80, 72#(107 kg/m)
3. 9 5/8in casing
The 95/8in casing is set at 10400 ft and will
be subjected, in the event of a kick, to
formation pressures from the next hole drilled
to a TD of 13 900 ft.
Collapse
At surface
Casing
collapse pressure = 0
design
At shoe
collapse pressure =73×10400/144
= 5272 psi (363.5 bars)
Draw a line between 0 and 5272 psi as shown in
Figure 10.14.
From Table 10.6 collapse properties ofavailable
casing are as follows:
Grade Weight (lbm/ft) Collapse pressure
SF = 1 SF = 1.1
C75 43.5 3750 3750/1.1=4412
L80 47.0 4750 4750/1.1=5888
C95 53.5 7330 7330/1.1=8624
Casing
design The above collapse resistances can be drawn as vertical lines,
as shown in Figure 10.14.
Burst
The 95/8in casing will be subjected in the event of a kick,
to a formation pressure of:
0.57 psi/ft×13 900 ft = 7923 psi (546 bar)
Burst at shoe = internal pressure
- external pressure
Burst at shoe = [Pf - (TD - CSD) x G]
- CSD × 0.465
Casing
A gas kick is considered for this string; thus, G = 0.1
design
psi/ft.
Therefore,
burst at shoe = 7923 - (13 900 - 10 400)
×0.1 - 10 400×0.465
= 2737 psi (189 bars)
(where TD = next hole depth = 13 900 ft).
Burst at surface = Pf – TD×G
Therefore,
Burst at surface = 7923 - 13 900×0.1
= 6533 psi (450.4 bar)
The burst line can now be plotted between 6533 psi at the
surface (i.e. at zero depth) and 2737 psi at 10 400 ft,as
shown in Figure 10.14。
From Table 10.6 burst pressures of available gradesof 9~ in
Casing casing as adjusted for an SF = 1.1 are:
design Grade Weight (lbm/ft) Collapse pressure
SF = 1 SF = 1.1
C75 43.5 5930 5390/1.1=5391
L80 47.0 6870 6870/1.1=6245
C95 53.5 7330 9410/1.1=8555
Biaxial effects
Check the weakest grade selected.Grade C75, 43.5#
Casing is the weakest grade, carrying a total buoyant
design load of 248.41 × 1000 lb, as shown in Table 10.10.
Tensile ratio = weight carried / yield strength
=248.41/942
=0.264
From Table 10.8 it can be seen that, for a tensile ratio of
0.264, the collapse resistance reduces to 84% of its
original value. Hence,collapse resistance of C75, 43.5#
under biaxial loading
= 0.84 x 3750
= 3150 psi (217.6 bar)
SF in collapse= collapse resistance under biaxial
loading÷collapse pressure at 3200 ft
=3150 ÷(73×3200/144)=1.94
Casing
Final selection
design
Depth Grade and weight
0-800 ft (244 m) C95, 53.5# (79.7 kg/m)
800-3200 ft (976 m) L80, 47# (70 kg/m)
3200-9700 ft (2957 m) C75, 43.5# (64.8 kg/m)
9700-10 400 ft (3170 m) L80, 47# (70 kg/m)
Casing
design
4. 7in casing
This string is set at 13 900 fi (4237 m).Collapse
Collapse pressure at surface = 0
Collapse pressure at 13 900 ft=87×13900/14
= 8398 psi (579 bar)
This pressure acts on the outside of the casing,
Casing
and for the worst possible situation assume that
design there is zero pressure inside the casing. Draw the
collapse pressure line, as shown in Figure 10.15,
between 0 psi at the surface and 8398 psi at 13
900 ft.
Collapse resistances, from Table 10.7, are as follows:
Grade Weight (lbm/ft) Collapse resistance
SF = 1 SF = 0.85
K55 26.0 4320 4320/0.85=5082
L80 29.0 7020 7020/0.85=8259
C95 29.0 7820 7820/0.85=9200
Casing
design
Hence, burst calculations for production casing should be
modified as follows.
(a) Burst pressure at shoe = surface pressure + hydrostatic
pressure of packer fluid -external pressure.
Normally
Casing SF = 1 SF = 1.1
design K55 26.0 4980 4980/1.1=4527
LB0 29.0 8160 8160/1.1=7418
C95 29.0 9690 9690/1.1=8809
Casing
= Wair× BF + (π/4)(di)2 × test pressure
Casing =8.4
design
(b) At 6100 ft
tensile ratio =154450/676000 = 0.23
Table 10.8 shows that for a TR=0.23, collapse
resistance reduces to 86% of its original value.
Therefore, adjusted collapse resistance of L80 =
0.86 ×7020= 6037 psi at 6100 ft
SF in collapse at 6100 ft
=6037/(87×6100/144)
=1.6
Final selection
Depth (ft) Grade and weight
0-950 C95, 29#
Casing
950-6100 LB0, 29#
design
6100-13 900 C95, 29#
section 6 other considerations
1 Effect of hydrogen sulfide on casing
A Hydrogen embrittlement
Other
considerations
2 Effect of field handling on casing
A Performance properties that a given joint of casing
will exhibit in the field can be affected adversely by
several field operations. For example, burst strength is
affected significantly by the procedure and equipment
used to make up the pipe.
Tests have shown that burst strength can be reduced
by as much as 70% by combinations of tong marks
that penetrate 17% of the wall thickness and 4% out-
of –roundness caused by excessive torque.
Other
considerations
B Mechanical deformations can also occur while the
casing is transported to location or while it is run into the
hole. Any mechanical deformity in the pipe normally results
in considerable reduction in its collapse resistance. This is
especially true for casing with high dn/t ratios. A thinwall
tube that is deformed by 1% out-of-round will have its
collapse resistance lowered by 25%. Thus, the slightest
crushing by tongs, slips, or downhole conditions diminishes
the collapse resistance by a significant amount.Some of the
special hydrogen-sulfide-resistant casings,such as C—90,
can be stress-hardened by careless handling.If this occurs,
the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement can be lost.
Other
considerations
3 compression in conductor pipe
Other
considerations
section 6 other considerations
1 Effect of hydrogen sulfide on casing
A Hydrogen embrittlement
Other
considerations
2 Effect of field handling on casing
A Performance properties that a given joint of casing
will exhibit in the field can be affected adversely by
several field operations. For example, burst strength is
affected significantly by the procedure and equipment
used to make up the pipe.
Tests have shown that burst strength can be reduced
by as much as 70% by combinations of tong marks
that penetrate 17% of the wall thickness and 4% out-
of –roundness caused by excessive torque.
Other
considerations
B Mechanical deformations can also occur while the
casing is transported to location or while it is run into the
hole. Any mechanical deformity in the pipe normally results
in considerable reduction in its collapse resistance. This is
especially true for casing with high dn/t ratios. A thinwall
tube that is deformed by 1% out-of-round will have its
collapse resistance lowered by 25%. Thus, the slightest
crushing by tongs, slips, or downhole conditions diminishes
the collapse resistance by a significant amount.Some of the
special hydrogen-sulfide-resistant casings,such as C—90,
can be stress-hardened by careless handling.If this occurs,
the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement can be lost.
Other
considerations
3 compression in conductor pipe
Other
considerations