Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
• (1) P > 0.05, therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis which gives
evidence there is no statistically significant association between doctor telling
respondent to lose weight and now controlling weight
SAS ‘Proc Freq’ Output:
Association of Doctor’s Advise on Increasing Exercise
• (2) P > 0.05,therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis which gives
evidence there is no statistically significant association between doctor telling
respondent to lose weight and increasing exercise
SAS ‘Proc Freq’ Output:
Association of Doctor’s Advise on Reducing Fat in Diet
• (3) P < 0.05, therefore, we reject the null hypothesis gives evidence there is a
statistically significant association between doctor telling respondent to lose
weight and reducing fat
Overall, does a doctor telling the respondent to lose
weight appear to impact the respondent’s behavior, base
don the 3 outcomes listed in the previous question?
• Null hypothesis: The odds ratio is constant across
comparison tables
• Alternative hypothesis: The odds ratio is not constant
across comparison tables
• The final model shows that including the variables RIAGENDR, DMDEDUC2,
DMDBORN4, MARSTAT, INDFMPIR, MCQ300C and MCQ365A yields the
highest R-squared value and has the most impact on the dependent variable,
BMI.
Describe What the Final Model Tells You About
this Relationship?
• PWald = 0.0003, therefore, this is a significant model overall.