Consultancy Services for Feasibility Study cum DPR for Upgradation

of road from “Manekhalli – Chincholli – Mariyan – Tandoor –

Maheboobnagar”to National Highway in the state of Karnataka.

20.12.2017

Jalavahini Management Service Pvt. Ltd., Dharwad

PROJECT INDEX MAP
NATIONAL HIGHWAY NETWORK
OF KARNATAKA
 MAJOR ROAD NETWORK OF
BIDAR, KALBURGI ( PROJECT AREA)
ROAD MAP OF PROJECT AREA
BIDAR, KALBURGI
TOPOSHEET MAP OF
PROJECT ROAD
PROJECT CHAINAGE
Satellite image OF PROJECT
ROAD
EXISTING ROAD DETAILS
TRAFFIC DETAILS
 REALLIGNMENT PROPOSAL OPTION -2- DETAILS OF MAJOR CORRECTIONS
PROPOSED LEVELS
SL STARTING ENDING EXISTING LENGTH START MID END GRADIENT REMARKS
NO CHAINAGE CHAINAGE LENGTH FOR POINT POINT POINT
REALLIGNMENT LVL LVL LVL
Existing road running through the project stretch is having
very geometrics & is not up to the standard of NH. As
14+570 17+770
there are reverse curves in hilly terrain, poor sight
1 (SH-15, Ch (SH-15, Ch 3.20 2.52 650 586.5 529 4.70%
distance and has insufficient transition length therefore
89+770) 92+970)
Design Speed is not achievable. Hence realignment is
proposed.
29+210 31+100 Project road runs through very bad geometric road. With
2 (SH-15, Ch (SH-15, Ch 1.89 1.989 Bridges and Approaches. Design speed is not available.
104+410) 106+300) Hence realignment is proposed.
Project road runs through chincholli town. Keeping in view
31+930 33+900 of growth of the city,The existing alignment will create
3 (SH-15, Ch (SH-15, Ch 1.97 1.62 problem inside the Chincholli town in future. Therefore a
107+130) 109+100) bypass is proposed to Chincholli town in the present
scope.
Project road runs through very bad geometric surface
38+930 39+670
across Nala with rolling terrain. Existing curves have
4 (SH-122, Ch (SH-122, Ch 0.74 0.687 464 482 489 3.70%
insufficient sight distances therefore design speed is not
100+070) 99+330)
available. Hence realignment is proposed.
Project road runs through Mariyan village. Which has
heavily built up no of houses on either side of road, with
45+170 47+600
much encroachment and Curves in the city will not provide
5 (MDR, Ch (MDR, Ch 2.43 2.56 457 454 460 1.40%
design speed due to insufficient transition length and sight
4+970) 7+400)
distances. Therefore it is proposed to bypass the Mariyan
village in the present proposal.
RE- ALIGNMENT SITE 1
RE- ALIGNMENT SITE 2
RE- ALIGNMENT SITE 3
RE- ALIGNMENT SITE 4
RE- ALIGNMENT SITE 5
 EXISTING FEATURES OF PROJECT ROAD
Sl. No. Particulars Existing Details Remarks
1 Start Km 0+000 Junction of SH-15 with NH-65 near Manakhelli, Bidar.
2 End Km 48+000 Karnataka and Telangana state boundary near Mariyan village.
4 Total Length 48+000 Km Appx. Design length
5 District 2 nos Bidar, Kalaburagi
6 Major Bridge 5 nos Ch. 103+273 , CH:105+180 ,CH:107+800, CH:2+600, CH:5+300
7 Minor Bridge 8 nos
8 Culverts 45 nos
9 Causeway 0 nos
10 VUPs/PUPs/RUBs 0 nos
11 ROB 0 nos
12 Level Crossing 0 nos
13 Major Junction 3 nos
14 Minor Junction 25 nos
15 Agricultural Land 75%
16 Built up Area 15% Land Use Pattern
17 Forest Lands 10%
Major Settlements :
Manakelli, Meenkhera, Vittalapur, Polakapally cross, Changleri, Chauki Tanda,
18 Villages/Towns 15 nos
Tumakunta, Nagaidhalai, Kollur cross, Kollur, Chincholli, Chandapur,Polakpally,
Kallur & Mariyan
Flexible 47.75 km
19 Existing Pavement Flexible / Rigid
Rigid 0.25 km (Hilly area near Tumakunta village)
Except at the starting of the project road which is having mountainous terrain for
20 Terrain Plain (Entire Stretch)
nearly 10.00 Km.
Red gravel and Black
21 Soil Type Gravel/Murrum, Lateriate strata in Humnabad Taluka.
soil
22 ROW 15.0m to 20.0m
 EXISTING FEATURES OF PROJECT ROAD

Existing Facility Major Junctions

Items Nos.
Sl No. Location Junction with

Major Junctions 3

Minor Junctions 25
Manakhelli Starting Point
1
Service Road Nil cross SH - 15 and NH - 65 Junction

Bus bay Nil

Chincholli
Bus Shelter 14 2 Basaveshwara SH - 15 and SH - 122
circle
Truck Lay bye Nil
Konchavaram
3 SH – 122, SH -149 and MDR
Grade Separator Nil cross
 LINE DIAGRAM OF LANE CONFIGURATION
EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION OF THE PROJECT ROAD OF MANAKHELLI TO MARIYAN
 SUMMARY OF LANE CONFIGURATION

Chainage
SL No Lane Configuration Section SH / MDR
From To
Manakhelli cross to Near
1 000+000 17+100 5.5 m (IL) SH- 15
Tumkunta.
2 17+100 17+350 5.5 m (IL) Near Tumkunta to Tumkunta. SH- 15

3 17+350 27+300 5.5 m (IL) Tumkunta to Near Patipur Road. SH- 15

Near Patipur Road to Iynholi
4 27+300 29+600 5.5 m (IL) SH -15
Road.
10.0 m (2L with paved Iynholi to Chincholli Ambedkar
5 29+600 32+200 SH -15
shoulder) circle.

14.0 m (4L divided Chincholli Ambedkar circle to SH -15

6 32+200 33+500
lanes) Chincholli Basaveshwar circle.

Chincholli Basaveshwar circle to

7 33+500 40+200 7.0 m (2L) Konchavaram Road. SH- 122

Konchavaram Road to Karnataka

8 40+200 48+000 7.0 m (2L) Telangana Boarder. MDR
PAVEMENT CONDITION
 Pavement condition is fair to good .
 The pavement is showing signs of distress due to

a) Lack of pavement drainage

b) Inadequate pavement thickness and composition
c) Heavy axle loads.
d) Inadequate maintenance.
 Noticed defects like

a) Raveling – Chainage : 0+000 to 15+600 Km & 34+000 to

48+000 Km
b) Cracking – Chainage : 0+000 to 24+000 Km
c) Rutting – Chainage : 0+000 to 15+600 Km
d) Edge breaking - Chainage : 15+600 to 31+000 Km

 The shoulders are earthen with fair to poor condition.

 The side drainage is earthen.
 The side soil is generally sandy & black.
 The embankment height is varies about 3.0 m, near the approaches
for the bridges its varies up to 8m .
PAVEMENT CONDITION

Continues…
 CHAINAGE SUMMARY : PAVEMENT CONDITION
Over all
Condition of Embankment
Chainage pavement
Shoulder Condition Village/
SL No. condition SH / MDR
Town
From To
Left Right Left Right Left Right
(km) (km)
1 0+000 1+000 P P P P F F Manakhelli cross SH-15
2 1+000 1+500 P P P P F F SH-15
3 1+500 2+000 P P P P F F Meenkhera SH-15
4 2+000 3+000 P P P P F F SH-15
5 3+000 4+000 P P P P P P SH-15
6 4+000 5+000 P P P P P P SH-15
7 5+000 6+000 P P P P P P SH-15
8 6+000 6+500 P P P P P P Vittalpur SH-15
9 6+500 7+000 P P P P P P SH-15
10 7+000 8+000 P P P P P P SH-15
11 8+000 9+000 P P P P P P Polakpally cross SH-15
12 9+000 10+000 P P P P P P SH-15
13 10+000 11+000 P P P P P P Changleri SH-15
14 11+000 12+000 P P P P P P SH-15
15 12+000 13+000 P P P P P P SH-15
16 13+000 14+000 P P P P P P SH-15
17 14+000 15+000 P P P P P P Chauki Tanda SH-15
18 15+000 16+000 P P P P P P SH-15
19 16+000 17+000 G G F F F F SH-15
20 17+000 18+000 G G F F F F SH-15
21 18+000 19+000 G G F F F F Tumkunta SH-15 Contd…
 Over all Condition
Embankment
Chainage pavement of
Condition Village/
SL No. condition Shoulder SH / MDR
Town
From To
Left Right Left Right Left Right
(km) (km)
22 19+000 20+000 G G F F F F SH-15
23 20+000 21+000 G G F F F F Nagaidlai SH-15
24 21+000 22+000 G G F F F F SH-15
25 22+000 23+000 G G F F F F SH-15
26 23+000 24+000 G G F F F F Kollur SH-15
27 24+000 25+000 P P P P P P SH-15
28 25+000 26+000 P P P P P P SH-15
29 26+000 27+000 P P P P P P SH-15
30 27+000 28+000 P P P P P P SH-15
31 28+000 29+000 ROAD UNDER CONSTRUCTION SH-15
32 29+000 30+000 ROAD UNDER CONSTRUCTION SH-15
33 30+000 31+000 G G G G F F SH-15
34 31+000 32+000 G G G G F F SH-15
35 32+000 33+000 G G G G F F Chincholi SH-15
36 33+000 34+000 G G G G F F SH-15/SH-122
37 34+000 35+000 G G G G F F Chandapur SH-122
38 35+000 36+000 G G F F F F SH-122
39 36+000 37+000 G G F F F F Polakpally SH-122
40 37+000 38+000 G G F F F F SH-122
41 38+000 39+000 G G F F F F SH-122
42 39+000 40+000 G G F F F F Konchavaram Cross SH-122
Contd…
 Over all Condition
Embankment
Chainage pavement of
Condition Village/
SL No. condition Shoulder SH / MDR
Town
From To
Left Right Left Right Left Right
(km) (km)
Konchavaram Road & Sedam SH-122/
43 40+000 41+000 G G F F F F
Road crosses MDR
44 41+000 42+000 G G F F F F MDR
45 42+000 43+000 G G F F F F MDR
46 43+000 44+000 G G F F F F MDR
47 44+000 45+000 G G F F F F MDR
48 45+000 46+000 G G F F F F Kallur MDR
49 46+000 47+000 G G F F F F Mariyan MDR
Karnataka Telangan
50 47+000 48+000 G G F F F F MDR
Boarder
Existing Utilities
TYPES Nos.

HT Lines 6

Electric pole 244

Transformer 5

Photographs
 ACCIDENT PRONE AREAS
Sl. No. Chainage
1 10+200 Km (SH-15)
2 14+900 Km (SH -15)
3 33+400 Km (SH-15 / 122)
4 39+200 Km (SH-122)
5 40+200 Km(SH-122 / MDR)
6 47+200 Km (MDR)
Blackspot Location
Changleri Tanda road
Chauki Tanda Cross
Basaveshwara Circle Chincholi
Thermal power plant near Tanda
Konchavaram Cross
Mariyan village
 CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
Details of Major Bridges (5 Nos.)
SL Chainage Length Span Structure configurations
No arrangements
1 103+273 120.0m 5.7 X 4.6 m Masonry Bridge with RCC deck slab.
(SH- 15) (17- Vents)
2 105+180 55.0 m 6.3 X 2.5 m Masonry Bridge with RCC deck slab.
(SH- 15) (6- Vents)
3 107+800 20.0 m 10.0 X 6.6 m
RCC deck slab Bridge.
(SH- 15) (1- Vents)
4 2+600 90.0 m 9.20 X 5.30 m
(MDR) (8- Vents) RCC deck slab Bridge.

5 5+300 40.0 m 8.60 X 4.10 m

(MDR) (4- Vents) RCC deck slab Bridge.

1 2 3 4 5
 CROSS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES

Details of Minor Bridges – RCC type (8 Nos.)

Sl. SH / MDR Chainage Length Height above Slab Formation

No (m) bed level (m) thickness (m) width
1 SH-15 80+000 22.0 3.5 0.45 7.50

2 SH-15 93+860 9.30 3.3 0.5 7.60

3 SH-15 96+800 44.0 3.1 0.6 11.50

4 SH-15 97+830 10.00 3.1 0.6 11.50

5 SH-15 98+730 11.00 2.7 0.45 11.10

6 SH-15 106+860 17.4 1.8 0.6 6.60

7 SH-122 108.300 10 3.5 0.3 12.0

8 SH-122 109.640 21 3.0 0.6 11.60

Contd…
 Details of Pipe Culverts (45 Nos.)
Sl.No Chainage Diameter of pipe Number of Condition of Formation width
(mm) pipes Pipe culvert (m)
1 75+300 900 1 Poor 10.0
2 76+100 1200 2 Poor 10.0
3 76+300 1200 3 Good 11.50
4 77+100 900 3 Poor 11.40
5 77+250 600 2 Poor 11.50
6 77+550 1800 3 Poor 11.50
7 78+000 600 2 Fair 11.40
8 78+456 600 6 Poor 11.50
9 79+128 900 5 Fair 11.30
10 79+300 900 2 Good 11.50
11 79+500 900 1 Good 11.30
12 80+800 900 1 Good 11.50
13 82+200 900 1 Fair 11.30
14 84+175 900 5 Good 12.00
Contd…
 Details of Pipe Culverts (45 Nos.)
Sl.No Chainage Diameter of pipe Number of Condition of Formation width
(mm) pipes Pipe culvert (m)

15 84+753 900 1 Poor 12.00

16 85+100 900 2 Poor 7.00
17 87+410 600 1 Fair 12.00
18 87+911 600 1 Poor 11.50
19 88+274 600 3 Good 10.00
20 88+556 600 1 Good 11.50
21 88+640 900 2 Good 10.50
22 88+970 600 1 Good 11.00
23 90+350 1200 2 Fair 11.00
24 90+400 1200 2 Good 12.00
25 90+686 900 1 Good 13.00
26 92+588 1200 2 Good 12.00
27 93+000 900 1 Good 12.00
28 93+100 1200 1 Good 12.00

Contd…
 Details of Pipe Culverts (45 Nos.)
Sl.No Chainage Diameter of pipe Number of pipes Condition of Pipe Formation width
(mm) culvert (m)
29 94+460 1200 1 Good 12.00
30 97+830 900 1 Good 12.00
31 98+950 1200 2 Good 12.00
32 99+560 1200 3 Good 11.70
32 100+588 900 2 Poor 19.00 (Canal)
33 101+450 1200 2 Good 11.80
34 104+200 600 1 Good 10.00
35 104+800 900 2 Good 11.00
36 105+300 1200 1 Good 14.00
37 105+800 1200 3 Good 14.00
38 106+300 1200 2 Good 14.00
39 107+000 900 2 Good 14.00
40 110+900 900 2 Good 12.00
41 111+900 1200 1 Good 11.60

Contd…
Details of Pipe Culverts (45 Nos.)
Sl.N Chainage Diameter of pipe Number of Condition of Formation width
o (mm) pipes Pipe culvert (m)
42 112+450 1200 1 Good 12.00

43 115+120 900 2 Poor 13.00

44 117+300 900 4 Poor 12.00

45 117+500 900 2 Good 11.00

Culverts : Total 68 Nos.

TYPES Nos.

Bridges 13

Slab Culvert 10

Pipe Culvert 45
 DISCUSSION ON ALIGNMENT
KMZ file
HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT
The highway basically follows the alignment of SHs and MDRs upgraded from ODR over the years. Most of
the places the alignment is over curves and bends which will need improvement as per the geometric
requirement of NH Two lane/Four lane specifications. The details of sharp curves which require
improvement is shown below in the Table. In accordance with provisions of clause 2.2 of IRC SP:73-2007,
the existing alignment will be examined and realignment suggested where essential. As can be seen from
the table below, there are a large number of chainages which will require curve improvement. In certain
cases realignment may also be required.

VERTICAL ALIGNMENT
The vertical geometry is an issue of significance. Especially in the ghat section substantial improvement in
the vertical profile will be required. This issue will be clearer once the details of topographical survey are
available. It may be pointed out that the vertical profile appears to confirm to the Stopping Sight Distance
and not the Intermediate sight distances. JMSPL will design the same in accordance with the relevant code
of practise for the vertical alignment once the detailed surveyed data are available. Presently no major
vertical alignment correction reaches are observed.
 TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (60m)

2000 2000 1500 7000 1500 2000 2000

SHOULDER

SHOULDER
CARRIAGEWAY

CORRIDOR
CORRIDOR

SHOULDER

SHOULDER
EARTHEN

EARTHEN
UTILITIY

UTILITY
PAVED

PAVED
Prop.CL
GRANULAR FILL GRANULAR FILL
ROW

SELECTED FILL 2 .5% SELECTED FILL

3%
2 .5% 3%

ROW
2 2
1 1
GL GL

1M 1M
(MIN) (MIN)
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
UNLINED OPEN DRAIN DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM) UNLINED OPEN DRAIN

WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)

GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
SUBGRADE

Typical Cross Section of Flexible pavement for 2-Lane in Open area

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

2000 2000 1500 7000 5000 7000 1500 2000 2000
SHOULDER

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

SHOULDER
CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY
CORRIDOR

CORRIDOR
KERB SHYNESS

KERB SHYNESS
500 500
EARTHEN

EARTHEN
UTILITIY

UTILITIY
Prop.CL
PAVED

PAVED
RAILING
ROW

ROW
2 .5% 2 .5% 3%
3%
2 2
1 1
GL GL

1M 1M
(MIN) BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC) (MIN)
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
UNLINED OPEN DRAIN DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM) DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM) UNLINED OPEN DRAIN
WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)
WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)
GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
SUBGRADE SUBGRADE

Typical Cross Section of Flexible pavement for 4-Lane in Open area

 TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (Min. - 25m)
10000
2000 1750 VARIES (Min. 3.75m) 1500 7000 1500 VARIES (Min. 3.75m) 1750 2000

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

CUM DRAIN
CARRIAGEWAY

CUM DRAIN
PAVER FLOORING PAVER FLOORING

FOOTPATH
CORRIDOR

FOOTPATH

CORRIDOR
UTILITIY

PAVED

PAVED

UTILITY
PAVER BLOCK PAVER BLOCK

Prop.C
L
ROW

ROW
RAILING RAILING
2 .5% 2 .5% 2 .5% 2.5 %
GL. GL.

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM)
DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM)
WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)
WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)
GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
SUBGRADE
SUBGRADE

Typical Cross Section for Flexible Pavement in Built up

RIGHT OF WAY
26500
2000 1750 7000 2500 7000 1750 2000

CUM DRAIN
KERB SHYNESS

KERB SHYNESS
500 500

CORRIDOR
FOOTPATH
CUM DRAIN

PAVER BLOCK LHS CARRIAGEWAY RHS CARRIAGEWAY PAVER BLOCK

FOOTPATH
CORRIDOR

1500
UTILITIY

UTILITY
Prop.C
L
L
ROW

ROW
RAILING
RAILING RAILING
2.5 % 2.5 %
2.5 %
2.5 %
GL. GL.

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)

BITUMINOUS CONCRETE (BC)
DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM)
DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM (DBM)
WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)
WET MIX MACADAM (WMM)
GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
GRANULAR SUB BASE (GSB)
SUBGRADE
SUBGRADE
Typical Cross Section of Flexible Pavement for 4-Lane in Built up
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTIONS
STATUS OF ENGINEERING SURVEYS AND
INVESTIGATIONS
Plan of Traffic Survey
Plan of Traffic Survey
 Plan of Traffic Survey

Origin and Destination Survey (OD)

Type of
Sl. No Count No Location Duration Remarks
Surveys

1 OD-1 At CVC - 01 Manakhelli cross 24 Hours x 1 Day

2 OD-2 At CVC - 02 Chandapur 24 Hours x 1 Day

Axle Load Survey (AL)

1 AL-1 At CVC - 07 Manakhelli cross 24 Hours x 2 Days

2 AL-2 At CVC - 08 Chandapur 24 Hours x 2 Days

 DETAIL TASK SUBMISSION:

Time Period in days

Stage
Activity from date of Key Date
No.
commencement
1 Inception Report
Submitted on
(i) Draft Inception report including QAP 21
document 24th October
2017
Submitted on
(i) Final Inception Report including QAP 30
document 3rd November
2017
2 F.S. REPORT
(i) Draft Feasibility Study report 18 December
including option study report 75
including draft 3(a) report 2017

(i) Comments of client 90 2 January 2018

(i) Final Feasibility Study Report
incorporating compliance of 105 17 January 2018
comments of client
 DETAIL TASK SUBMISSION:

Time Period in
Stage
Activity days from date of Key Date
No.
commencement
3 LA & Clearance I Report
(i) Draft LA & Clearances I Report including Draft
90 2 January 2018
3(A) report
(i) Comments of Client 105 17 January 2018
(i) Final LA & Clearances I Report incorporating
120 22 January 2018
compliance of comments of Client
4 Detailed Project Report
(i) Draft DPR 165 20 March 2018
(i) Comments of Client 195 19 April 2018
(i) Final DPR incorporating compliance of
210 1 May 2018
comments of client
5 Technical Schedules
(i) Draft Technical Schedules 135 15 February 2018
(i) Comments of Client 150 2 March 2018
(i) Final Technical schedule 165 17 March 2018
Clearances II Report
Approval of Project Clearance from concerned
7 agencies e.g. from MOEF; Rly for approval of GAD 240 31 May 2018
and detail engineering drawing of ROB/RUB;
Irrigation Department;
 PROJECT OFFICE
Contact Persons: Er. Shivakumar B Yelasangimath, Deputy Team Leader
Address:
Jalavahini Management Services Pvt. Ltd
JMS (p) ltd “Lumbini plot No-187 GDA layout Opp. Ghatage,
Layout Beside Central bus stand
Kalaburgi 585102
Email:jmsplnh@gmail.com

DESIGN & HEAD OFFICE CORPORATE OFFICE

Contact Persons: Er. Jagadeesh Nandi, Team Leader Contact Persons: Er. Venkatesh Sheshappanavar
Dharwad Head Office : Address:
Jalavahini Management Services Pvt. Ltd Jalavahini Management Services Pvt. Ltd
#14, Sarala, 2nd Cross, Jayanagar, Dharwad-580001 #13/B, “Panchamukhi”,11th main, Hampionagar,
Phone : 0836-2775052,0836-2771056; Vijayanagar 2nd stage, Bengaluru-560104
Telefax:0836-2773226 Phone : 080-23142144,
Email : jalavahini@gmail.com, Email : jalavahini@gmail.com,
jmsdwd@gmail.com jalavahiniblore@gmail.com
Website : www.jmspl.in Website : www.jmspl.in
 LOA
 The Letter of Acceptance was issued by Chief Engineer, National Highway, Bengaluru on
23 August 2017 vide letter no. CNH/TA3/AE7/IP ROAD/MANAEKHALLI - CHINCHOLI
/863/LOA/2017-18/2482 for the work of “Consultancy Services for Feasibility & DPR of
Manaekhalli - Mariyan.

 Contract agreement was signed on 03rd October 2017.

MEETING:

 Kick-off meeting had been arranged at EE office, Kalaburagi along with NH sub-
divisional officers and DPR consultant team on 12th September 2017. Accordingly,
MOM had been issued through our vide letter no. 4029 dated 15.09.2017.

 Internal meetings with all discipline heads were conducted at our regional office for
the preparation and submission of Inception/Feasibility/Detailed project Report.
WORK PROGRAMME